C32 AMG or CLK500!?
The CLK has a newer body.. I'd buy that given the choice. The CLK500 is no slouch either..
Eric...
-Brad-
Trending Topics
CLK500 is 60+K new and even a C55 is only low 50's.
If youg get the CLK500 with the 7 speed then YES, you can hand with a C32 stock, but in the C32 will eventually pull away. I doubt you can get a 7sp CLK500 for under 45k, since they just came out.
C32 easier & cheaper to mod and lighter.
CLK500 good looks, but ugly Butt and easy to mod but you need $$$$
AMG all the way...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
CLK500 is 60+K new and even a C55 is only low 50's.
If youg get the CLK500 with the 7 speed then YES, you can hand with a C32 stock, but in the C32 will eventually pull away. I doubt you can get a 7sp CLK500 for under 45k, since they just came out.
C32 easier & cheaper to mod and lighter.
CLK500 good looks, but ugly Butt and easy to mod but you need $$$$
AMG all the way...
If the clk500 is cheaper then thats another plus. I definitely go for the clk500.
I am not crazy about the front end of the c-class, i think the headlights just look awekward. Although the C55 headlights look nice, since its the same as the clk.
So hands down I get the clk!
just make sure the clk has xenon lights because the regular halogen lamp is plain ugly.
IMO, if you are considering a coupe, try to spring for the CL. Now THAT is a nice-looking coupe.
haha, he said ****...heheheheh
edit: i agree with vomit on the styling
Last edited by Bux; Oct 18, 2005 at 01:28 PM.
IMO, if you are considering a coupe, try to spring for the CL. Now THAT is a nice-looking coupe.
IMO, if you are considering a coupe, try to spring for the CL. Now THAT is a nice-looking coupe.
civic w/ steriods? oh come now, u are exaggerating. now thats the first time i heard that one. think ur way off.
The clk looks closer to the CL than a civic.
This is a no brainer, really... CLK500 all the way. A lot of the C32 owners are obviously biased... Post this in the CLK forum and see what happens...
Eric...
Think about this please.





