Track results K&N, GREENS, STOCK FILTERS!
Here are the results on the track that tells differences if any with the more popular choices compared to stock air filters. Basically I see no major difference with the aftermarket filters but definitely see a difference with the stock filters. All runs were by the same guys with time inbetween for cooling while replacing filters. Conditions were near perfect for the SC cars. Its all preference guys between the two aftermarket filters. My preference is the Greens but the K&N seem better built. By the way if you haven't read my thread on this the K&N cleaner does a better job at cleaning the Green filters.
The 1st pic shows the best run with the K&N filters,(13.4360@104.58)
The 2nd pic shows best time with Green filters,(13.4602@103.93)
The 3rd shows best with stock filters.(13.9038@101.60)
The 4th run well its my car besting a stock E55 who's non-owner driver made a huge burnout but almost caught me
but I will take the momentary win 
C32used 13.5780@103.93 ChicagoX 14.9370@104.89
Last edited by c32used; Oct 17, 2007 at 10:40 AM.
Here are the results on the track that tells differences if any with the more popular choices compared to stock air filters. Basically I see no major difference with the aftermarket filters but definitely see a difference with the stock filters. All runs were by the same guys with time inbetween for cooling while replacing filters. Conditions were near perfect for the SC cars. Its all preference guys between the two aftermarket filters. My preference is the Greens but the K&N seem better built. By the way if you haven't read my thread on this the K&N cleaner does a better job at cleaning the Green filters.
The 1st scan shows the best run with the K&N filters,(13.4360@104.58)
The 2nd scan shows best time with Green filters,(13.4602@103.93)
The 3rd shows best with stock filters.(13.9038@101.60)
The 4th run well its my car besting a stock E55 who's non-owner driver made a huge burnout but almost caught me
but I will take the momentary win 
C32used 13.5780@103.93 ChicagoX 14.9370@104.89
Edit" it did not let me upload the scans so will upload the pictures from my cellphone in the morning"


Your results confirmed my G-tech results which showed K/N's had a .19 average second drop in my 0-60 times over the stockers
THANKS FOR THE GREAT WORK
See yeah
It really don't matter the time difference between the aftermarket filters in my opinion cause the driver could of had a better reaction time and less spin so its all whatever one likes as long as they are not stock filters
if anyone cares to borrow me a set of other filters to test(I will pay for return shipping)It looks like there will be another track day in mid-November.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Don't forget, a LITTLE oil goes a LONG way. I have about four cans of left over oil, but yet they NEVER give you enough cleaner

See yeah
also found out on the track that the previous owner must have installed a LSD
Last edited by c32used; Oct 19, 2007 at 12:34 AM.
It was mentioned while we were there will try it on our next track day.....as I mentioned before if anyone wants to send me other filters to test I will put them to the test also. As for foam filters I never heard of them so if you could post a weblink about it I will appreciate it.
also found out on the track that the previous owner must have installed a LSD
also found out on the track that the previous owner must have installed a LSD







