RENNtech ECU Dyno numbers!
05-24-2008, 06:47 PM
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
The faster time slip is at work and its a 13.88. So I guess I better clarify, We'll say 8/10's faster than a whole second. Remember I still have 19's on the front with these runs. As far as it running better when its hot is a mystery to me as well, Maybe its the IK20's I dont know?? The picture with the 3 timeslips is all in the same day. Far left-6.35 pm, Middle 2.06 am, Right 1.00 am. My car numbers are different because I was at the midnight drags for the later runs.
Let me know if you have a 60 ft reading for the 13.88 slip.
Sorry guys for the hijack!
05-24-2008, 08:27 PM
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 c32 99 superduty
Car is running consistant #s how much hotter was it on the 13.88 run and what was your 60 ft time . I bet that 13.88 actually has a superior 60 ft time than the later slower runs. Overall nice consistant numbers and good r/t's.
Let me know if you have a 60 ft reading for the 13.88 slip.
Sorry guys for the hijack!
Let me know if you have a 60 ft reading for the 13.88 slip.
Sorry guys for the hijack!
05-24-2008, 10:09 PM
#28
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
Been doing some thinking and Im now dead set on getting headers. Leaning towards the Renntech ones since it will work well with my tune. Im not sure what other headers will do the Renntech tune, So at this point there my first choice. I know other companies make headers for my car and i'm open to those if the performance and quality is good. should have the cash up in a few weeks and then i will post more dyno results when that time comes this time there will be video! I just dont think you can go wrong with RENNtech headers.
05-24-2008, 10:28 PM
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Been doing some thinking and Im now dead set on getting headers. Leaning towards the Renntech ones since it will work well with my tune. Im not sure what other headers will do the Renntech tune, So at this point there my first choice. I know other companies make headers for my car and i'm open to those if the performance and quality is good. should have the cash up in a few weeks and then i will post more dyno results when that time comes this time there will be video! I just dont think you can go wrong with RENNtech headers.
I'm sure you can't go wrong but I think the Renntech headers are even more $$$ than the Kleemann ones...
05-24-2008, 10:29 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 c32 99 superduty
Been doing some thinking and Im now dead set on getting headers. Leaning towards the Renntech ones since it will work well with my tune. Im not sure what other headers will do the Renntech tune, So at this point there my first choice. I know other companies make headers for my car and i'm open to those if the performance and quality is good. should have the cash up in a few weeks and then i will post more dyno results when that time comes this time there will be video! I just dont think you can go wrong with RENNtech headers.
05-24-2008, 10:51 PM
#31
Former Vendor of MBWorld
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
Dont worry about that this thread belongs to all. Renntech headers are like 4k or maybe a bit more, There is a set on ebay right now that $2999 Buy it now. guy at renntech said they should fit. I will be looking and waiting for a bit of a deal. Dyno-comp in AZ will install them for about $500 and run a dyno. I've save for the "Best" I got all the stupid toys i need except a real monster of a car.
06-08-2008, 12:19 PM
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
02 c32 99 superduty
Car is running consistant #s how much hotter was it on the 13.88 run and what was your 60 ft time . I bet that 13.88 actually has a superior 60 ft time than the later slower runs. Overall nice consistant numbers and good r/t's.
Let me know if you have a 60 ft reading for the 13.88 slip.
Sorry guys for the hijack!
Let me know if you have a 60 ft reading for the 13.88 slip.
Sorry guys for the hijack!
