Just saw Motorweek on the speed channel
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Just saw Motorweek on the speed channel
C63 AMG 0-60 in 5.0; 1/4 mile 13.2 at 113 mph. Does that sound right? I thought it was much quicker than that......Must weigh a lot. Yeah, I suppose
I should have posted this elsewhere but I'm just comparing our cars to it.
I do like the trick features on the car and the styling...
I should have posted this elsewhere but I'm just comparing our cars to it.
I do like the trick features on the car and the styling...
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: FT POLK LOUISIANA
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1992 Toyota Corolla, 1994 Chevy C1500, 2002 C32, 2012 Prius, 2013 Toyota Sienna
Yea, well check out this thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c55-amg-w203/252618-lol-video.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c55-amg-w203/252618-lol-video.html
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Yea, well check out this thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=252618
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=252618
#6
Yea, well check out this thread.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=252618
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=252618
I bet M3 fans will use that motorweek as an example and feel they will best the C63 everywhere besides the track...heck I bet now the E46 people will feel they will take it on without an issue.
Last edited by c32used; 07-19-2008 at 12:43 AM.
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Does the C63 weigh 4780 lbs....that can't be right....maybe I converted incorrectly.
Trending Topics
#9
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: sac, calif.
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 slk55
Motorweek is a crap show. They never drive aggressively. Their launches are often very weak. I recall the Gallardo doing a similar 0-60 time.
In fact, just found it. This is what they did with it... Utter garbage show
0-60 5.1sec, 13.3 @ 109.
Link:
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2426.shtml
In fact, just found it. This is what they did with it... Utter garbage show
0-60 5.1sec, 13.3 @ 109.
Link:
http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2426.shtml
#13
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
they probably didn't launch the car. They probably just did it from a dead stop and just mashed the gas.
The c63 weighs 3649 lbs. How can a car that only weigh 150lbs more then a c32 with a 100 more hp would be slower then 0-60 then a c32?
Even c32's have been known to go to 0-60 4.7-4.9seconds depending on the kind of tires you have.
Just shows you can only take magazine numbers with a gain of salt.
The c63 weighs 3649 lbs. How can a car that only weigh 150lbs more then a c32 with a 100 more hp would be slower then 0-60 then a c32?
Even c32's have been known to go to 0-60 4.7-4.9seconds depending on the kind of tires you have.
Just shows you can only take magazine numbers with a gain of salt.
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2008/merc...865/specs.html
Maybe your thinking gross weight.
#17
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
edmunds saids 3649 is the curb weight.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2008/merc...865/specs.html
Maybe your thinking gross weight.
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2008/merc...865/specs.html
Maybe your thinking gross weight.
edit: I meant 1730 kgs. not lbs. sorry.
Last edited by FrankW; 07-19-2008 at 02:50 AM.
#18
Super Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Oakland, California
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 E550, 02 C32, 91 300E
#20
Super Member
Kinda like when they thought they could take down the CLK55 no problem?