C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

C32 vs C55...who is faster????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-05-2008, 06:06 PM
  #26  
Super Member
 
SeeKlasse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
haha ... the fact that you made a personal attack on me is evidence to me that i struck a softspot when noting your V6's lameness.... its two inline 3's for cryin out loud.... i could have bought a C32 or a C55 (cash) but since theyre both really fast cars i figured id get in alot more trouble. theres a reason why the C32 is the most wrecked mercedes-amg of all time, large production numbers (comparatively) and alot of power.

one interesting peice of info.... the c32 gets by the c55 on the ring... according to my searches, the c32 is 8:37 and the c55 is 8:22 ouch...

also according to my search, i found an old post on MBworld stating that the c43 beats the c32 around hockenheim...

Last edited by SeeKlasse; 09-05-2008 at 06:16 PM.
Old 09-05-2008, 06:35 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by SeeKlasse
the car with the biggest motor will more than often end up being the winner. people get into sc and tc battles but ultimately the 55 motor sc will SPANK the 32 motor (whatever mod you want to put). there would be room to debate if the motors werent built on the same technology. 3 valve sohc twinspark v config.... who cares about money the fact remains that the C55 is the winner

game over
this is true when comparing apples to apples, but your comparing a stock FI c32 to a NA C55 and converting it to FI.

The cost of converting NA engines for FI usually outweighs the returns in performance.

Looking back at amgsc twin charging thread he basically spend $20k to 20K+ on making him hit 500+ tq and i believe 434whp.

Once the LEt turbo kit is done, you can spend $7k on the kit and have 500whp.

If i wanted to drop $20k, i would rather just buy a used e55. There comes a point where the cost to mod isn't worth it and its just better to buy another car just as fast stock.
Old 09-05-2008, 06:37 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by AMGSC
That is a false statement. I've got 579rwtq at 2000rpm.
looking back at your other thread i will revise my statment.

stock vs stock c55 is faster


modded vs modded $10k and below in mods the c32 is faster.

$20k + in modds the c55 is faster because i'm trading in my c32 for a e55
Old 09-05-2008, 06:40 PM
  #29  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
hooleyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
looking back at your other thread i will revise my statment.

stock vs stock c55 is faster


modded vs modded $10k and below in mods the c32 is faster.

$20k + in modds the c55 is faster because i'm trading in my c32 for a e55
Kleemann SC is only 8K software 1k =9k uninstalled
This thread is dead
Old 09-05-2008, 06:54 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by SeeKlasse
also, V8's seem to be the best performance option for most car sports. dtm, nascar.... i wonder why they dont use SC'ed v6's... they must be scared of the potential and leave the v6's for lemans.... lol you v6 guys crack me up
There's no real reason why they use v8's other then the fact they just chose to use them. If you look at F1, there 4 cyclinder turbos were making more power then there v8's.

Then FIA changed there mind and went to v8's then changed there mind and went to v10's then changed there mind again and went back to v8's with a hybrid electric motor speed boost option.

Using those racing leagues as examples isn't really proof that v8's are the best performance option.

Nascar isn't really a racing series to show performance, there more for entertainment. How much performance are you going to see when the technology in those car's haven't changed in 20yrs and all the cars are exactly the same?

At least FI forces there teams to use new technology to improve performance.

V8's are dead, $5 gas killed it, unless you live in saudia arabia.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:05 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by SeeKlasse
haha ... the fact that you made a personal attack on me is evidence to me that i struck a softspot when noting your V6's lameness.... its two inline 3's for cryin out loud.... i could have bought a C32 or a C55 (cash) but since theyre both really fast cars i figured id get in alot more trouble. theres a reason why the C32 is the most wrecked mercedes-amg of all time, large production numbers (comparatively) and alot of power.

one interesting peice of info.... the c32 gets by the c55 on the ring... according to my searches, the c32 is 8:37 and the c55 is 8:22 ouch...

also according to my search, i found an old post on MBworld stating that the c43 beats the c32 around hockenheim...

Do you have links to prove your production and wrecked statements? i never heard of this, but i would like to see some facts.

As for the ring time, i think it makes sense that a manufacturer when they produce a new model, would try to make it faster then the previous model.

The ring time is irrelevant for your argument about the v6 being lame since much of the improved time came from the improved suspension on the c55 vs the c32, the added 20 crank hp from the v8 only had a small impact on the actual ring time.

Last edited by TemjinX2; 09-05-2008 at 07:09 PM.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:07 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by hooleyboy
Kleemann SC is only 8K software 1k =9k uninstalled
This thread is dead
Yeah, but how reliable will it be without FI internals?

I'll stick by revised statement for now.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:31 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
how much did you spend to hit that 579 tq number? what was the hp? from the sig it looks like 434whp?
The dyno listed is from Vadim running at 6psi with 450rwtq. I dyno'd it myself at JBA Racing in SD, CA and it pulled 579rwtq before we shut it down at 2000rpm due to lean condition, running 14.5-1 AFR with 8psi with smaller pulley.

I'm not doing another dyno since I'm replacing the motor with a 7.3litre with a Quad Turbo setup soon after I pickup up my bonus at year-end.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:33 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by SeeKlasse
haha ... the fact that you made a personal attack on me is evidence to me that i struck a softspot when noting your V6's lameness.... its two inline 3's for cryin out loud.... i could have bought a C32 or a C55 (cash) but since theyre both really fast cars i figured id get in alot more trouble. theres a reason why the C32 is the most wrecked mercedes-amg of all time, large production numbers (comparatively) and alot of power.

one interesting peice of info.... the c32 gets by the c55 on the ring... according to my searches, the c32 is 8:37 and the c55 is 8:22 ouch...

also according to my search, i found an old post on MBworld stating that the c43 beats the c32 around hockenheim...
Now funny cause it should be better at the ring since its newer but you can't come on our side and diss the C32 either rather its too fast to keep you staying legal or the C55...C32 and C55 owners are both proud of the models they selected as should you...it completely understandable that you attack a post directed at you but keep in mind its the C32 your attacking not just the member who posted against you.....its bickering by a third party member thats get the ball rolling but under normal circumstances all C32 and C55 owner roam here without issues so if someone attacks your post then be the bigger man and PM him and don't post negative thing things about the C32 here which creates a worse situation. Keep in mind we live in the USA so places like Hockenheim don't exist here but I say if you need to prove anything just ask a member here that lives in your town to do a friendly challenge with you in an American circuit and test the abilities of your car with that of the C32 and while you are at it ask a C55 to join so we all can read about it but at the end its matters less to most or all us C32/55 owners so it'll die in the archive of MBWorld
Old 09-05-2008, 07:35 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by AMGSC
The dyno listed is from Vadim running at 6psi with 450rwtq. I dyno'd it myself at JBA Racing in SD, CA and it pulled 579rwtq before we shut it down at 2000rpm due to lean condition, running 14.5-1 AFR with 8psi with smaller pulley.

I'm not doing another dyno since I'm replacing the motor with a 7.3litre with a Quad Turbo setup soon after I pickup up my bonus at year-end.
Why are you letting this or any other member get to you? Let it die...before we get a bunch of members going.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:37 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
Yeah, but how reliable will it be without FI internals?

I'll stick by revised statement for now.
Let it go.... the only one laughing is seeklasse
Old 09-05-2008, 07:39 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by PC Valkyrie
I've said this before, and I''ll say it again.......the C32 and C55 are similar in straight line acceleration in stock form (maybe the C55 is SLIGHTY faster).

The biggest change MB/AMG did was significantly improve the handling/steering and added the electronic pseudo LSD when they developed the C55 to make it more competitive with the E46 M3 on a track.
Don't waste your breath...Seeklasse is getting the laugh here.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:40 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by c55asleep?

Btw you don't always need to go with a s/c on n/a
Let it go Rolly...why give seeklasse a good show?
Old 09-05-2008, 07:41 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by TemjinX2
this is true when comparing apples to apples, but your comparing a stock FI c32 to a NA C55 and converting it to FI.

The cost of converting NA engines for FI usually outweighs the returns in performance.

Looking back at amgsc twin charging thread he basically spend $20k to 20K+ on making him hit 500+ tq and i believe 434whp.

Once the LEt turbo kit is done, you can spend $7k on the kit and have 500whp.

If i wanted to drop $20k, i would rather just buy a used e55. There comes a point where the cost to mod isn't worth it and its just better to buy another car just as fast stock.
I only spent $7.5K plus $1.5K for Vadim's installation (including missing parts) so $9K total. My car makes over well over 434whp after the 8psi pulley was installed which only cost me another $250 installed. Besides, I happen to like a smaller car to go around a ring/track vs. a straight ahead family sedan. The money I wasted was on that POS HPS kit.
Old 09-05-2008, 07:45 PM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Talking

Originally Posted by jalberto
Anybody tested this out?
Yo espero que tu sepas espanol tambien...ay threads con esta informacion si asses un search....si necessitas ayuda pofavor de mandal un PM a mi y con gusto te ayudarre...(sorry guys but decided to use spanish in this post)
Old 09-05-2008, 07:48 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Originally Posted by ScottW911
I understand that statement. But, first of all, the OP lists a CLK430 as his ride. Second, new to C32 or C55, they should still be able to search the forum first.

This is just more of the same old bickering. Who needs it all over again?
+1,000,000
Old 09-05-2008, 07:54 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by boohooramblers
Cooling????
I'd be more worried about the 2 cylinders that are FUBAR.
(not said snidely either)
If it's FUBAR, then when do you want to meet up for a friendly haul down the drag strip? I guess it's 6 cylinders vs. 6 cylinders
Old 09-05-2008, 07:57 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 Weistec 3.0L SC'd C55, 2006 MaxPsi PT6466 Turbo'd M3, 2019 Maserati GTS , 2020Alfa Quadrifoglio
Originally Posted by FrankW
too much after his HPS supercharger fiasco and missing parts from kleemann kit issue. glad if it's finally running tho. did the cooling issue fixed itself?
There never were any cooling issues with the Kleemann. Are you kidding. Kleemann TWIN-SCREW 2.6liter Autorotor IS THE BOMB of all aftermarket and even OEM superchargers. That's why I'm going to get my full $7.5K back when I sell it for my Quad-Turbo 7.3 upgrade to full race car.
Old 09-05-2008, 08:03 PM
  #44  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
hooleyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
food for thought... I got a C55 with mods. I would say there are way more faster C32's on this forum then C55's. now that this tread is finished we should move on to the 400th sprintbooter thread
Old 09-05-2008, 08:07 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32used's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,209
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
LET C32 2002
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by hooleyboy
food for thought... I got a C55 with mods. I would say there are way more faster C32's on this forum then C55's. now that this tread is finished we should move on to the 400th sprintbooter thread
Thats getting the ball rolling the other way...
Old 09-05-2008, 08:52 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
mb_c55amg_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 c55amg, 2000 clk430, 2002 clk55amg, 2008 clk63amg black series
Money is the answer to that question...

It is my belief that it is he who has the most money and the desire...has the fastest car. it will work either way...a c32 with an unlimited budget will stomp a c55...and vice versa...my father always told me....son...remember...it doesnt matter if you think you are the best or the baddest guy on the block...there is always someone else out there who is better than you or more bad than you on another block. I assume it holds true in the automotive world...no matter how fast or how badass your car is...there is always someone out there who has a faster and more badass car.

ssg walker
us army
Old 09-05-2008, 09:11 PM
  #47  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
hooleyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Glendale Arizona
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C55,SL55,C63
I'm officially banning myself from posting in this thread advise others to do so to for the sanity on this forum
Old 09-05-2008, 09:21 PM
  #48  
Super Member
 
SeeKlasse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
well put!

for the record, i love both cars, the c32 and c55. ive only seen 3 c55's on the street compared to dozens of c32's. i live in the northern atlanta suburbs. ive seen two different bugatti veyrons here, so its not as if people cant afford a c55. i remember driving a c32 when they came out, i was thoroughly impressed and still am.

i like the w209 nose on the c55, i think it looks very sleek!


sorry for impeding on your thread but we go through the same thing over in the c36/43 forum all the time. i was interested in putting the fire out, but it ended up being a flame war!
Old 09-05-2008, 09:25 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
wawy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
Attention Mr Vanos - please lock this thread
Old 09-05-2008, 10:25 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TemjinX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
Originally Posted by AMGSC
I only spent $7.5K plus $1.5K for Vadim's installation (including missing parts) so $9K total. My car makes over well over 434whp after the 8psi pulley was installed which only cost me another $250 installed. Besides, I happen to like a smaller car to go around a ring/track vs. a straight ahead family sedan. The money I wasted was on that POS HPS kit.
i thought you were going to do internals to though right? oh well good luck on the 7.3L.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C32 vs C55...who is faster????



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM.