Recommend shocks for my C32 - HR Lowered
Bilstein if the ones you got right now are the sports and not the oem replacement. they should have shorter internal travel which when you install the lowering springs they do not affect the overall travel of the shocks.

Seems like nobody really bothers with upgraded shocks when going with lowering springs. Majority of people here seem to be running them with stock dampers. Most will say the setup is "fine". I assume that just means the suspension hasn't collapsed on itself. Not really my idea of "fine".
Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 6, 2011 at 07:01 PM.
Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 6, 2011 at 10:41 PM.
New cost from the dealer on c32 struts is $230/each. I imagine c55 will be similarly priced.

FrankW’s experience with fitting shorter aftermarket springs to original dampers closely parallels those of other members. I initially did the H&Rs on ~45,000-mile OE struts. Looked pretty good, but it was immediately evident that the mismatched load height/spring rate/flaccid damping combination would require prompt attention and another approach. Thus began my suspension experimentation travails.
Didn’t want to come across as aloof and arrogant vis-à-vis that xenon thread. If you can swing it, concurrently upgrading the dampers is clearly preferable. Have read of several who’re pleased with their off-the-shelf Bilstein 35-053453/F4-VE3-5345-H strut & H&R setup.
It would have been considerably less expensive and easier to simply source coilovers on a whim. Steadfastly refused to do so. Where is the challenge in that? There is something appealing about being asked “What have you done to yours?” while unwinding in the paddock after a rewarding track day session.
Trust you’ll let us know how yours go.
Based upon my research here, it seems that new OE C55 struts would be the best combo with lowering springs.
I plan to run those struts with Vogtland springs shortly, along with refreshed bearings and bushings.
I was considering going to a Bilstein PSS9 coilover kit, but if the C55 front struts and springs along with C55 rear shocks (C32 C55 rear springs are identical I believe) will give me better handling for half the cost, I will go that route.
Can someone confirm that these are the correct C55 part numbers for the struts/shocks
Can't access EPC Net outside of the USA)Struts: 203 320 78 30
Shocks: 170 011 46 00
Thanks,
Wayne
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Regards,
Wayne
I can say that changing from just C32 Struts/Shocks to C55 Struts/Shocks made the car probably twice as stiff.
Prices for part numbers Splinter provided.
203-320-83-30 - $276 cdn each (C55 front strut)
203-326-43-00 - $199 cdn each (C55 rear shock)
203-321-70-04 - $327 cdn each pair (C55 front springs)
Guy at parts counter said 203-320-80-30 doesn't show up in the computer. The prices are pretty good. I want to just go for the front struts and install them with my h&r springs. Just one question, what is the difference between the RoW and US front strut? Does RoW mean wagon specific? Should I be going for the US strut?
I'm also assuming there is no difference between left and right strut correct?
Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 10, 2011 at 09:48 PM.
Prices for part numbers Splinter provided.
203-320-83-30 - $276 cdn each (C55 front strut)
203-326-43-00 - $199 cdn each (C55 rear shock)
203-321-70-04 - $327 cdn each pair (C55 front springs)
Guy at parts counter said 203-320-80-30 doesn't show up in the computer. The prices are pretty good. I want to just go for the front struts and install them with my h&r springs. Just one question, what is the difference between the RoW and US front strut? Does RoW mean wagon specific? Should I be going for the US strut?
I'm also assuming there is no difference between left and right strut correct?
RoW means rest of the world. I would assume the U.S. valving would be the same for Canada. The 203-320-80-30 part I check at parts.com and it shows up as "strut convertible back". No indication of the model or year. A mystery.
Wayne
The EPC is typically more accurate than my recurring dyslexia. This thread certainly won’t be the last time I’ll have posted faulty intel!
Note code 494 denotes "U.S.-specification" in this instance:
Wayne, let me know what you decide to do. I'm still not 100% on the setup I want.
Bry
Wayne, let me know what you decide to do. I'm still not 100% on the setup I want.
Bry
The pricing you were quoted for the struts is reasonable, however the springs are a bit pricey as the US price through parts.com is about $80 each.
Wayne

Last edited by SYZYGY; Feb 12, 2011 at 11:54 PM.
A comfy ride and acceptable behavior while approaching the limit of adhesion are still mutually exclusive in my experience. Note Zeppelin’s “probably twice as stiff” post. Ridden in a 997 with PSM recently?;) I’ve unabashedly strayed toward the performance end of the compromise. Your experience may differ significantly, although having piloted an M3 I suspect it wouldn’t. A sound strategy has typically been to improve that end which consistently contributes less than its fair share to the cornering equation.
Perhaps you can catch up with stalwart Canadian member PC Valkyrie during one of his track days. He’s given a solid go against many a ‘faster’ machine with his PS2- and Renntech airbox-equipped (but otherwise stock) C55.
There’s certainly nothing wrong with exploiting OE parts for retrofitting purposes if they’ll help to serve your objectives. Respectfully suggest you needn’t be too concerned with rear spring rate during the initial phase of upgrading since, as you’ve already noted, they’re easily swapped. Not to belabor the point, Affalterbach had occasion to fit a curious selection of 202, 203 and 210 springs to the rear of the C32 and C55.










