C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Recommend shocks for my C32 - HR Lowered

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 06:33 PM
  #26  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
Now you have me worried. I wonder how the Bilstein's will fair against the H&R springs. Are the springs too short or is dampening the problem?

thanks.
stock damper is too long. when the lowering springs are installed the damper itself is already compressed which decrease the designed rebound/bound travel range.

Bilstein if the ones you got right now are the sports and not the oem replacement. they should have shorter internal travel which when you install the lowering springs they do not affect the overall travel of the shocks.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 06:55 PM
  #27  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
Gotcha. However, I remember Splinter mentioning that even the Koni's which are designed for lowering springs had problems and he still bottomed out. I have found KONI's to be a bit softer than Bilstein's. I'm conflicted on what to do. I don't want to waste money on the Bilstein's if they still aren't good enough for the springs. At the same time, I don't want to waste time/money installing them with the stock dampers if that doesn't work either. Before purchasing the H&R springs, I was considering a set of the H&R street performance coilovers. The price would have been similar to the Bilstein/H&R shock/spring combo. I also wouldn't have to worry about spring pads and the front being too low. Looking at the pic splinter posted of his front end with H&R springs is worrying. I think I'll have to remove the front lip now too

Seems like nobody really bothers with upgraded shocks when going with lowering springs. Majority of people here seem to be running them with stock dampers. Most will say the setup is "fine". I assume that just means the suspension hasn't collapsed on itself. Not really my idea of "fine".

Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 6, 2011 at 07:01 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #28  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
run the c55 dampers. They are designed for the c55 springs, which, from my understanding, are approximately 1" lower than the c32 springs
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #29  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by SYZYGY
run the c55 dampers. They are designed for the c55 springs, which, from my understanding, are approximately 1" lower than the c32 springs
Since I've never seen any used C55 dampers for sale, I think that would mean buying them new from the dealer? I'm guessing the dealer price for stock C55 dampers would probably cost more than a new set of coilovers. I don't think it's a cost effective option. Any idea who the C55 dampers are made by? If they're simply some sort of SACHS turbo gas shocks or something, it might be plausible since I get SACHS stuff pretty cheap. I still think the C55's front strut would be too long for the H&R springs. The front is absolutely slammed.

Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 6, 2011 at 10:41 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 08:28 PM
  #30  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
Yeah, they are Sachs. The PN is floating around on here somewhere, although when I did a google search for it, nothing came up.

New cost from the dealer on c32 struts is $230/each. I imagine c55 will be similarly priced.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 08:38 PM
  #31  
splinter's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 12
From: Orange County, CA
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Zeppelin swapped in C55 dampers and springs; his runs quite well.




Originally Posted by FrankW
if you use the stock dampers they will bottom (hitting the bump stops) out fairly easy...
+1

FrankW’s experience with fitting shorter aftermarket springs to original dampers closely parallels those of other members. I initially did the H&Rs on ~45,000-mile OE struts. Looked pretty good, but it was immediately evident that the mismatched load height/spring rate/flaccid damping combination would require prompt attention and another approach. Thus began my suspension experimentation travails.

Didn’t want to come across as aloof and arrogant vis-à-vis that xenon thread. If you can swing it, concurrently upgrading the dampers is clearly preferable. Have read of several who’re pleased with their off-the-shelf Bilstein 35-053453/F4-VE3-5345-H strut & H&R setup.

It would have been considerably less expensive and easier to simply source coilovers on a whim. Steadfastly refused to do so. Where is the challenge in that? There is something appealing about being asked “What have you done to yours?” while unwinding in the paddock after a rewarding track day session.

Trust you’ll let us know how yours go.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #32  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
From what I've read, the Bilstein 35-053453/F4-VE3-5345-H strut & H&R setup is actually pairing softer-than-factory dampers with shorter springs. I don't see how that could be an improvement, unless the factory struts were worn to begin with.

Based upon my research here, it seems that new OE C55 struts would be the best combo with lowering springs.

I plan to run those struts with Vogtland springs shortly, along with refreshed bearings and bushings.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 10:23 PM
  #33  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
I'm delighted to see this thread revived as Splinter has enlightened me on the Powergrid front sway bar links.

I was considering going to a Bilstein PSS9 coilover kit, but if the C55 front struts and springs along with C55 rear shocks (C32 C55 rear springs are identical I believe) will give me better handling for half the cost, I will go that route.

Can someone confirm that these are the correct C55 part numbers for the struts/shocksCan't access EPC Net outside of the USA)

Struts: 203 320 78 30
Shocks: 170 011 46 00

Thanks,
Wayne
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 8, 2011 | 11:33 PM
  #34  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
I called a Sachs dealer and I'm waiting to hear back to see if we can get OE stuff directly from Sachs for a (hopefully) cheaper price. The MBZ dealer quoted me $230-$300 for C55 struts, depending on VIN number. He was unable to tell me the difference between the three part numbers that came up, other than the part numbers themselves being different.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 02:05 AM
  #35  
splinter's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 12
From: Orange County, CA
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
C55 dampers:

front-
203 320 83 30 (U.S. valving)
203 320 80 30 (CLK55 and RoW valving)

rear-
203 326 43 00 (U.S. and RoW valving)


C55 springs:

front-
203 321 70 04 (U.S. and RoW)

rear-
The C32 and C55 have similar fitment, contingent upon options’ weight.


Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 08:34 AM
  #36  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
Originally Posted by splinter
C55 dampers:

front-
203 320 83 30 (U.S. valving)
203 320 80 30 (CLK55 and RoW valving)

rear-
203 326 43 00 (U.S. and RoW valving)


C55 springs:

front-
203 321 70 04 (U.S. and RoW)

rear-
The C32 and C55 have similar fitment, contingent upon options’ weight.


Thank you Splinter. Your weath of knowledge and experience are invaluable to the forum.

Regards,
Wayne
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 02:00 PM
  #37  
Zeppelin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 3
From: OC
C32
Just a slight correction to Splinters description of my car. I run the C55 Struts/Shocks on H&R springs. I never had the chance to try the car on C55 Springs so not sure if it would handle better with those or the H&R springs.

I can say that changing from just C32 Struts/Shocks to C55 Struts/Shocks made the car probably twice as stiff.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 10:41 PM
  #38  
reflex92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: CO
02 C32 AMG, 2012 S550
Thats interesting....
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 12:05 PM
  #39  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
I ordered a pair of c55 struts from the dealer. They run 290 a piece. Never heard back from the Sachs dealer.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 12:49 PM
  #40  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
I went to the merc dealer in maple, ontario today. Here's what I found.

Prices for part numbers Splinter provided.

203-320-83-30 - $276 cdn each (C55 front strut)
203-326-43-00 - $199 cdn each (C55 rear shock)
203-321-70-04 - $327 cdn each pair (C55 front springs)

Guy at parts counter said 203-320-80-30 doesn't show up in the computer. The prices are pretty good. I want to just go for the front struts and install them with my h&r springs. Just one question, what is the difference between the RoW and US front strut? Does RoW mean wagon specific? Should I be going for the US strut?

I'm also assuming there is no difference between left and right strut correct?

Last edited by Autotechnica; Feb 10, 2011 at 09:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #41  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
I went to the merc dealer in maple, ontario today. Here's what I found.

Prices for part numbers Splinter provided.

203-320-83-30 - $276 cdn each (C55 front strut)
203-326-43-00 - $199 cdn each (C55 rear shock)
203-321-70-04 - $327 cdn each pair (C55 front springs)

Guy at parts counter said 203-320-80-30 doesn't show up in the computer. The prices are pretty good. I want to just go for the front struts and install them with my h&r springs. Just one question, what is the difference between the RoW and US front strut? Does RoW mean wagon specific? Should I be going for the US strut?

I'm also assuming there is no difference between left and right strut correct?
Hi Bryan,

RoW means rest of the world. I would assume the U.S. valving would be the same for Canada. The 203-320-80-30 part I check at parts.com and it shows up as "strut convertible back". No indication of the model or year. A mystery.

Wayne
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 12:46 AM
  #42  
splinter's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 12
From: Orange County, CA
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Autotechnica, left and right are indeed interchangeable. MB simply reverses the upper anti-roll bar link attachment.

The EPC is typically more accurate than my recurring dyslexia. This thread certainly won’t be the last time I’ll have posted faulty intel!

Note code 494 denotes "U.S.-specification" in this instance:

Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 10:10 AM
  #43  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
Hmm.. guy at the parts counter could not confirm what the parts were. He said I would need a VIN number of the specific car the parts were meant for. Ahh what a pain.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2011 | 07:59 PM
  #44  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
Hmm.. guy at the parts counter could not confirm what the parts were. He said I would need a VIN number of the specific car the parts were meant for. Ahh what a pain.
I know how you feel. In the past I've been to 3 dealers for parts. They all require a VIN for even a simple bolt.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #45  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
Looks like I'll most likely be going with the H&R springs w/ C55 front struts. Are the stock C32 rear shocks underdamped as well? Replacing those at a later time won't be much of a problem if it's required. If I hadn't already purchased the H&R springs I probably would have gone for the C55 front springs. They do seem a bit pricey for just a front pair, especially compared to the front struts that are somewhat resonably priced.

Wayne, let me know what you decide to do. I'm still not 100% on the setup I want.

Bry
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #46  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
Looks like I'll most likely be going with the H&R springs w/ C55 front struts. Are the stock C32 rear shocks underdamped as well? Replacing those at a later time won't be much of a problem if it's required. If I hadn't already purchased the H&R springs I probably would have gone for the C55 front springs. They do seem a bit pricey for just a front pair, especially compared to the front struts that are somewhat resonably priced.

Wayne, let me know what you decide to do. I'm still not 100% on the setup I want.

Bry
I'm planning to go with the C55 strut/springs along with C55 Shocks. I'll get about an inch of drop in the front. The c55 shocks have firmer valving from the information I have researched. Our rear springs are similar to C55's as Splinter has stated. I'll save about $1K compared to the Bilstein pss9 coilovers.

The pricing you were quoted for the struts is reasonable, however the springs are a bit pricey as the US price through parts.com is about $80 each.

Wayne
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 04:56 PM
  #47  
Autotechnica's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
2002 C32 AMG
Hmmm odd. The shocks and struts from MB are actually pretty much the same price as parts.com once you factor in shipping/taxes. However, there's quite a big gap for the springs. For that price I'm considering selling my H&R's and getting the C55 front springs. I'm just wondering how similar are the rears on the C32/C55 springs. I don't like mis-matching parts unless I really know what I'm doing. I'm very conflicted
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 10:18 PM
  #48  
03MBC32's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
2003 C32
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
Hmmm odd. The shocks and struts from MB are actually pretty much the same price as parts.com once you factor in shipping/taxes. However, there's quite a big gap for the springs. For that price I'm considering selling my H&R's and getting the C55 front springs. I'm just wondering how similar are the rears on the C32/C55 springs. I don't like mis-matching parts unless I really know what I'm doing. I'm very conflicted
Agree with you on mismatched parts. I'm looking for the information that states the rear c32/c55 springs are the same. Will post when located.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011 | 11:52 PM
  #49  
SYZYGY's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
C32, E93 M3
If The c55 rear springs are the same as the c32 rear springs then it would seem likely that the c32 rear shocks are the same as the c55 rear shocks. I am simply replacing my front c32 struts with c55 hardware, and installing h&r springs on all four corners while keeping the c32 rear shocks.

Last edited by SYZYGY; Feb 12, 2011 at 11:54 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 04:42 AM
  #50  
splinter's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 12
From: Orange County, CA
GMC - Miata - Trek - P-Car
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
..I want better handling, less understeer and less body roll…it feels like it's geared more towards comfort than performance.
Originally Posted by Autotechnica
..I don't like mis-matching parts unless I really know what I'm doing.
Given its decent thrust, my C32’s original chassis was dreadfully mismatched as delivered. AMG substantially improved the W203’s capabilities in its later iterations. Its documented Nürburgring Nordschleife performance and reputable periodicals during the C’s heyday have repeatedly proven same.

A comfy ride and acceptable behavior while approaching the limit of adhesion are still mutually exclusive in my experience. Note Zeppelin’s “probably twice as stiff” post. Ridden in a 997 with PSM recently?;) I’ve unabashedly strayed toward the performance end of the compromise. Your experience may differ significantly, although having piloted an M3 I suspect it wouldn’t. A sound strategy has typically been to improve that end which consistently contributes less than its fair share to the cornering equation.

Perhaps you can catch up with stalwart Canadian member PC Valkyrie during one of his track days. He’s given a solid go against many a ‘faster’ machine with his PS2- and Renntech airbox-equipped (but otherwise stock) C55.

There’s certainly nothing wrong with exploiting OE parts for retrofitting purposes if they’ll help to serve your objectives. Respectfully suggest you needn’t be too concerned with rear spring rate during the initial phase of upgrading since, as you’ve already noted, they’re easily swapped. Not to belabor the point, Affalterbach had occasion to fit a curious selection of 202, 203 and 210 springs to the rear of the C32 and C55.

Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE