Installing Iridium IX plugs in 02' C32 tomorrow..What plugs & gap r you guys running?
Last edited by benzluvr1; Sep 6, 2009 at 03:48 PM.
and plugs and gap depend on your mods. if you're running more boost, you might want to go a step colder and change the gap. if stock, there is no need......and really, there is no need to change your spark plugs unless you're over 80K or so without a change or live in a rough climate
I'm running a heat range colder NGX IX Iridiums at a .034 gap. I'm running a range colder, again, because i'm running more boost than stock
The ones you are installing should be gapped at .034, especially considering you are not running any after market pulley.

stock plugs are gaped at .039. if he doesn't have any mods why would .034 help?
I was reading what Splinter wrote on plugs gaping and reading some more.
here's from what I read
* narrow-gap risk: spark might be too weak/small to ignite fuel;
* narrow-gap benefit: plug always fires on each cycle;
* wide-gap risk: plug might not fire, or miss at high speeds;
* wide-gap benefit: spark is strong for a clean burn.
and from reading narrow-gap has worse mpg? also read that the reason for narrower gap is for those that are running 185 pulley which more boost = higher chance of spark getting blew out?
anyway, I've been running these NGK Iridium IX .039 plugs. I've gotten on avg less mpg then when I'm running Denso IK20 .040 plugs. BUT the iridium IX seems to be responding better/quicker?...OR it's just my imagination. I just did 228miles on 13gallon with majority highway miles. That avg only 17.5mpg. That's about 1mpg worse then what I was able to achieve before. I'm gonna put the IK20 (pulled then when I was diagnosing idle issue and they were all good still, so I saved'em) back and see what happens.
btw, don't know if the IK20 is colder plug then the iridium IX or if they have the same rating. wonder if that makes a difference in mpg.
Last edited by FrankW; Sep 6, 2009 at 04:48 PM.
btw, don't know if the IK20 is colder plug then the iridium IX or if they have the same rating. wonder if that makes a difference in mpg.
Frank, what speed were you going on the highway? which it does matter obviously........with my heat range colder and .034 gap, i get about 25-26 when going 65 and 21-22 when going 75+......so your 17.5 if mostly highway sounds low to me......and i'm only running on 91 octane
as far as the Densos vs NGKs, the NGKs that i have are equivalent to the heat range colder - IK22s. IK20 is the stock heat range for the C32 and is not the same heat range that i'm running (despite all the NGK IXs being called thus, they have different part numbers denoting the different heat ranges).
Frank, what speed were you going on the highway? which it does matter obviously........with my heat range colder and .034 gap, i get about 25-26 when going 65 and 21-22 when going 75+......so your 17.5 if mostly highway sounds low to me......and i'm only running on 91 octane
as far as the Densos vs NGKs, the NGKs that i have are equivalent to the heat range colder - IK22s. IK20 is the stock heat range for the C32 and is not the same heat range that i'm running (despite all the NGK IXs being called thus, they have different part numbers denoting the different heat ranges).
about 50 of the rest 100miles were highway and 50 was local.
17.5 is the avg of 13 gallon covering 228miles.







