DYNOJET vs DYNOLOG this is more than interesting

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Rate Thread

Oct 5, 2010 | 10:29 PM

sultanC36

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 129

Likes: 0

DYNOJET vs DYNOLOG this is more than interesting

Hello ladies and gents

some times i ask my self why do i do this kind of stuff , i wish i knew will here goes

stock tune,2.5 dual exhaust with X-pipe ,

these first batch of dyno runs were preformed on a DYNOJET

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfhR1UqbNXg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CO-zusBJdnA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHu2nKZ-8Lo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p90DNCmmDD4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdCcwRbyUr0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRp-LrPYCZ0

best number 297whp STD and 307whp SAE
now for the surprise

same stock tune,2.5 dual exhaust with X-pipe
here are my DYNO LOG runs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0HM5uGoTLg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdaAczD1tyM

best number 285WHP

same time of day same weather condition same car same every freaking thing

i am going nuts over here i thought the dynolog should be 10% or more lower than the dynojet i can only see 12WHP almost 4.5% is that rite

??? or have we been

Oct 5, 2010 | 11:09 PM

loudandheard

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 1,948

Likes: 3

From: Houston, TX

C32/C55 AMG

I have heard that a dyno could vary as much as +/-15hp on the same day and especially on different dynos. Maybe try doing some thing more drastic such as headers, you already have various baseline dynos. I'm surprised your exhaust did not yield more HP.

Oct 6, 2010 | 03:31 AM

LawRens

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Oct 2008

Posts: 1,102

Likes: 1

From: Norcal

dynolog is VERY conservative on their numbers. Be proud, 285 is excellent. my c43 on dynolog got bad numbers... so bad i'm not even going to post it... LOL.

Oct 6, 2010 | 05:27 AM

sultanC36

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 129

Likes: 0

the headers are in the pipeline just waiting to confirm the tune and who is doing it also i will change the X-pipe i have to one that is better flowing

Oct 9, 2010 | 09:18 PM

sultanC36

Thread Starter

Member

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 129

Likes: 0

helo gents after my PM conversation with Mr.Sonny that i need to recaliberate the dyno speed on a mainline dyno or should i say DYNOLOG dyno this is what i came up with and got me even more puzzeld

here was our conversation

Originally Posted by sultanC36
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny@Marranos
Quote:
Originally Posted by sultanC36
hi sonny

u said your car was ramped up at 10km/persec,A c55 being a v8 should be at least ramped up at 12km/persec minimum

which i don't understand can you please explain what dose that mean and also what difference would it have been if they ramped it at 12km/persec

thanks for your help

and here are the rusults and videos

276WHP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33xcW7wYlhg

&
281.9WHP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BrxYYoQAi0

Oct 11, 2010 | 04:09 PM

Newzchspy

MBWorld Fanatic!

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 4,165

Likes: 4

PLAID

Quote:

Originally Posted by sultanC36

** FWIW, this is about what a stock C55 does/should do on a Dynojet!! *** I've seen it before at Chicago Performance and this is pretty typical. I've seen from RWP 280-295 from a stock C55 with no mods.

Reply Subscribe