Never ending saga with world's slowest C55 AMG.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Never ending saga with world's slowest C55 AMG.
Today I went again with my buddies C55 to the dyno with his new mods and it's still weak as hell.
When I went last time, his car put down 289whp with 305wtrq stock with just a Renntech airbox. It felt like a dog down low though which is weird cause it put down a nice amount of torque but it would barely spin it's tires. His A/F ratio was also in the mid 14's....yikes!
I installed a new MAF and fixed a few vacuum leaks and BOOM...now the car spins it's tires with ease off the live. I installed Kleeman headers with no cats, made a true dual exhaust and Eurocharged reprogrammed his ECU.
Took the car today to the dyno and to my surprise, the first run was 289whp. WTF!!!
The best run was 297whp with 299wtrq ( 8whp gain with 6wtrq loss ). A/F ratio was even LEANER this time...touching 15.0. This is crazy!
What could be wrong with this car? The only CEL codes it has are due to the primary cat deletes and that's it. The LTFT's are fine and the car drives fantastic. It's driving me crazy.
When I went last time, his car put down 289whp with 305wtrq stock with just a Renntech airbox. It felt like a dog down low though which is weird cause it put down a nice amount of torque but it would barely spin it's tires. His A/F ratio was also in the mid 14's....yikes!
I installed a new MAF and fixed a few vacuum leaks and BOOM...now the car spins it's tires with ease off the live. I installed Kleeman headers with no cats, made a true dual exhaust and Eurocharged reprogrammed his ECU.
Took the car today to the dyno and to my surprise, the first run was 289whp. WTF!!!
The best run was 297whp with 299wtrq ( 8whp gain with 6wtrq loss ). A/F ratio was even LEANER this time...touching 15.0. This is crazy!
What could be wrong with this car? The only CEL codes it has are due to the primary cat deletes and that's it. The LTFT's are fine and the car drives fantastic. It's driving me crazy.
Last edited by GT-ER; Dec 27, 2011 at 09:13 PM.
Super Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Delran, NJ
05 C55
How is it the worlds slowest, if you arent racing it? Dynos are meant for tuning, and unless you have back to back runs, on identical days...you could just be wasting your time. People get way too caught up in dyno numbers, especially when they can be manipulated so easily.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
How is it the worlds slowest, if you arent racing it? Dynos are meant for tuning, and unless you have back to back runs, on identical days...you could just be wasting your time. People get way too caught up in dyno numbers, especially when they can be manipulated so easily.
Plus, it's a dynojet that tends to read high and most people on these forums with the mods I have installed get over 350whp or so...yet this one has 297. That's a HUGE amount. He also was dead even when he raced a bone stock Trans Am LS1 that ran 13.8@101mph.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
02 996 Turbo, 05 CLK55 AMG
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
His A/F is fubar because their is something wrong with the car, not the tune. The car was lean as hell even before the tune. There is something wrong and I can't figure out what it is.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,073
Likes: 27
From: North NJ
2002 C32 AMG, 2013 GLK 350/4, 2015 E63S AMG Wagon
When was the fuel filter changed? Was that OEM? Any way you can check the fuel pressure at the rail?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
I though about checking fuel pressure...but it doesn't SEEM like it's fuel pressure since even in low rpms it's lean and it doesn't get leaner the higher it revs...it just stays the same. But it's a good thing to test.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
I did before and after runs of the mods...Headers, no cats, dual exhaust and EC ECU only gained 8whp and lost 10wtrq?
Plus, it's a dynojet that tends to read high and most people on these forums with the mods I have installed get over 350whp or so...yet this one has 297. That's a HUGE amount. He also was dead even when he raced a bone stock Trans Am LS1 that ran 13.8@101mph.
Plus, it's a dynojet that tends to read high and most people on these forums with the mods I have installed get over 350whp or so...yet this one has 297. That's a HUGE amount. He also was dead even when he raced a bone stock Trans Am LS1 that ran 13.8@101mph.
and my 02 TA with a lid ran 13.5@107. 2.35 60'
(Leaving at idle) My CLK55 ran 13.0@108.xx with headers and tune. Granted when I ran the CLK55 the conditions were not nearly as good but an LS1 and a M113 AMG car are actually fair game when stockish. Sounds right to me. Maybe NA cars just don't like your air.I would check fuel pressure just to be sure though.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 8
From: Seattle, WA
C55
That does look low. On a dynojet with k&n's, kleeman tune and headers with primary cats removed I pulled 337.8 whp/345.4lbs-ft. I ran a 13.1 with bigger 19" rims and just a LET tune when I put down around 305whp so I would guestimate that it should be around 12.8 or so now, esp if I put on my semi-slicks.
Dirty maf? I hear it can lead to sluggish performance too.
Dirty maf? I hear it can lead to sluggish performance too.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
The maf has already been replaced with an oem one. The weird thing is that the car feels fantastic driving around slowly. It purrs like a kitten at part throttle and feels great. At WOT it pulls pretty decent ( like a 300whp car does )...but it's just not nearly as quick as I expected it to be. Especially after putting over $2K in aftermarket parts only to get 7whp more out of it. Yikes!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
From: Chicago
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
The maf has already been replaced with an oem one. The weird thing is that the car feels fantastic driving around slowly. It purrs like a kitten at part throttle and feels great. At WOT it pulls pretty decent ( like a 300whp car does )...but it's just not nearly as quick as I expected it to be. Especially after putting over $2K in aftermarket parts only to get 7whp more out of it. Yikes!
ANother thing to keep in mid is the altitude, this directly affects D/A which will hurt an NA car more than a FI car. Not sure where in PR you are, but I know its pretty mountainous.
Last edited by Nachtsturm; Dec 28, 2011 at 01:56 PM.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
My CLK is trapping 108-109 prior to the renntech cf airbox, the C55 in question should be the same. Dyno's don't are a tuning tool, take it to a 1320, if it is trapping close to 110, then 290whp doesn't really matter. Keep in mind its no E55.
ANother thing to keep in mid is the altitude, this directly affects D/A which will hurt an NA car more than a FI car. Not sure where in PR you are, but I know its pretty mountainous.
ANother thing to keep in mid is the altitude, this directly affects D/A which will hurt an NA car more than a FI car. Not sure where in PR you are, but I know its pretty mountainous.
Again, bone stock it put down almost the same power than it did with all the mods I put installed on it. Some people here gain 50-70whp with all the mods I did...and I gained 7whp? No way. I'm not even expecting 40whp...but maybe at least 25-30whp.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
...but do these engines tend to fail? I mean, has anyone ever had one go bad naturally aspirated?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Senior Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Warshington
2005 C55, 2006 Ram 2500 MegaCab diesel, sold 2001 Dodge 2500 Cummins, sold 87 190e-16v, sold 97 e420
I'd check the easy stuff first:
Spark plugs, then wires and coils. Usually higher mileage cars suffer from injector clogging too, doesn't hurt idle much but definite loss of top end power. The problem with the C55 is no inline filter, just one in the tank.
Spark plugs, then wires and coils. Usually higher mileage cars suffer from injector clogging too, doesn't hurt idle much but definite loss of top end power. The problem with the C55 is no inline filter, just one in the tank.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 7
From: Puerto Rico
2005 E55 AMG
Eurocharged reprogrammed the ECU yesterday again with some tweaks and the car feels pretty good. It's not staining the tips so I guess it's not so lean anymore. I also ordered a brand new maf ( the previous one I put in was used ) to make sure all is good since they apparently seem to give a lot of trouble.
Stay tuned for the next dyno, hopefully I can get at least 320whp out of this dog...lol.
