C32 vs B6 S4
#1
C32 vs B6 S4
Hi, i m a nubbie. i currently own a 01 M3 and in the market of trading in my IS300 for another 4 dr sport sedan. i know this is the "c32 forum" and also know that the s4 just came out, so no one actually knows the true performance of the car yet.please post some pros and cons of both awesome machine.
thanks,
Jack
thanks,
Jack
#2
Super Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you want performance you might want to look at the new cadillac CTS-V it has 400 HP its a V8 corvet Z06 engine. i think 0-60 it was 4.7 sec and it handles better than an M5 the price of the car sould be $47K http://www.imakenews.com/autospies/e...e000144018.cfm
#3
You have to be joking about suggesting the man should buy the Caddy, right? While the numbers look impressive, it's STILL a caddy with all of the wonderful inherent GM reliability issues.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003 C32
Originally posted by Marko
You have to be joking about suggesting the man should buy the Caddy, right? While the numbers look impressive, it's STILL a caddy with all of the wonderful inherent GM reliability issues.
You have to be joking about suggesting the man should buy the Caddy, right? While the numbers look impressive, it's STILL a caddy with all of the wonderful inherent GM reliability issues.
But again, we're talking about a paper car. And where does that article mention the M5?
I don't see this doing very well for Cadillac. Their demographic are AARP members and rappers...neither of which buy fast cars.
First the SL "killer" and now this...best of luck to Cadillac. More competition benefits the customer.
#5
Super Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Marko
You have to be joking about suggesting the man should buy the Caddy, right? While the numbers look impressive, it's STILL a caddy with all of the wonderful inherent GM reliability issues.
You have to be joking about suggesting the man should buy the Caddy, right? While the numbers look impressive, it's STILL a caddy with all of the wonderful inherent GM reliability issues.
#6
Super Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AlpharettaC32
Their demographic are AARP members and rappers...neither of which buy fast cars.
Their demographic are AARP members and rappers...neither of which buy fast cars.
#7
both the s4 and c32 would be a great car overall. there was one motor mag ..motortrend? that did a comparison of the 2 already the c32 was faster in the 1/4 but out of the hole the s4 was ahead. testdrive ofcourse
Trending Topics
#8
Super Moderator
Comin from an a6 2.7T I have no choice to be a lil bias. I loved that car and still do. I have been reading nothing but good things about the S4 but coming from the audiworld forums it's a given. I haven't driven the S4 so can't say anything but on paper I have read that the C32 is a little better. All I can say is test drive jus my 2 cents
#9
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by ro0zy
both the s4 and c32 would be a great car overall. there was one motor mag ..motortrend? that did a comparison of the 2 already the c32 was faster in the 1/4 but out of the hole the s4 was ahead. testdrive ofcourse
both the s4 and c32 would be a great car overall. there was one motor mag ..motortrend? that did a comparison of the 2 already the c32 was faster in the 1/4 but out of the hole the s4 was ahead. testdrive ofcourse
C32 v S4
4.77 v 4.99 0-60mph
13.24@106 v 13.44@105
The S4 does handle better in the slalom with 68mph. C32 ran the slalom with 67.3mph