Need advice: buying a 75K miles C55 which has $16K insurance claims?
-There are two insurance claims in the car's history report, one at $8K (rear ended) and the other claim at $2.7K (right front).
-The car had three owners and the last one has been driving it since 2007.
-Both of the accidents occurred between 50K and 60K miles.
-The dealer was asking $9.5K, said won't go lower than $9K and I'm sure I can put some additional pressure to get it at $8.5K
I'm wondering if these claims are scary enough to walkaway, I thought that a $8K claim on a C55 isn't a big deal, and since it's rear damages then I shouldn't really worry. There isn't any salvage or rebuilt title in the car's history report and the dealer confirmed that there is no frame damage, only trunk, suspension, bumper and tailight were damaged.
What do you think? Is this a good deal?
Considering the price these cars go for nowadays, I wouldn't even bother with something like that.
Between all the accidents ad repairs and three owners with low miles....the car probably never got proper service. Plus you are at the 75k mark which is right before most of the major services are due on most mercedes cars.
Whats your budget for a c55?
Last edited by PJmak; Apr 13, 2017 at 01:31 PM.
First off is to understand what you plan on doing with the car, if you plan on spending moderate amounts of money to upgrade the power on the car, the C32 is the way to get the best HP/$, but if you're willing to spend big $$, then the C55 is the way to go. If you want a car that you're not going to be doing much modding (power-wise), I'd go for the C55 just because it's simpler for maintenance (being a NA and all).
I personally find the C55 plenty fast enough in stock form, and don't plan on doing any power upgrades. The interior feels more refined than the C32 and the look is much more modern (but that's also highly subjective). The shocks/springs and suspension overall is a lot better in the C55 than the C32 (stock vs stock, but that can be remedied with an aftermarket coil-over setup). I also prefer the exterior styling of the C55 over the C32.
So overall, aside from the general hassles of R&M on a supercharged engine vs NA engine, there isn't much difference from the 32 to the 55 (aside from the subjective personal preferences). The both cars are well documented in problems:
C32 - leaky intercooler & faulty radiator (valeo ones were bad, but Behr ones in late '03 and in '04 were okay), pulleys/belts need to be checked every now and then to make sure they're not about to fall off/shatter
C55 - leaking valve gasket covers
EDIT: The seats in the 55 are also a lot nicer than in the 32, they 'hug' you a lot more
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

The C230 I had that had been wrecked seemed like it wasn't bad as the paint looked as good as factory (which is the only reason I went through with buying it because I thought if the paint looked that good it couldn't have been that bad) but underneath the right strut tower was bent and the frame rail had been pulled using heat (a big no no). I paid to have the strut tower pulled into alignment and they me the frame rail and all the parts that had been replaced (even the whole right front door had been replaced). The car should have had the frame rail replaced which would have totaled the car even though it was wrecked when it was only 2 years old. I traded the car after having it for 6 months and took a bath. There will be other cars come up for sale.
Nonetheless, I have been able to get one from an AMG fanatic with extensive service history. I'm extremely excited!!! I will create a separate thread on Sunday to present my new baby as it's one of a kind, not your typical C32. To be continued...









