C32 AMG, C55 AMG (W203) 2001 - 2007

Will stock front C55 wheel/tire fit on rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #1  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Will stock front C55 wheel/tire fit on rear?

C55 stock wheels/tires

Front = 7.5x18 (ET:30mm) and 225/40-18 tire
Rear = 8.5x18 (ET:34mm) and 245/35-18 tire

Can anyone confirm? As a spare, will front fit on rear given:

a. Offset difference (30mm front vs. 34mm rear).

b. Rolling circumference difference = 26.7mm between left and right if front is used as spare on rear (see calc below).

Note:
Diameter calculation:
d1 = (225)(0.40)(2) + (18)(25.4) = 637.2mm
d2 = (245)(0.35)(2) + (18)(25.4) = 628.7mm
Circumference difference = (pi)(d1-d2) = (3.14)(8.5) = 26.7mm

Rgds,
Norm

Last edited by noka; Jan 18, 2005 at 06:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 02:22 AM
  #2  
rbaker's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Redondo Beach
Z06, M3, Mini Cooper S. Sold: C55
Can't confirm that, but don't see why the fronts wouldn't fit on the rear, as the front's have much larger brakes. The rear's are just 20mm wider on the outside & 5mm on the inside than the front. I imagine you're considering this for a spare, so it'll probably work. I'd just try swapping to check.

FYI, I think you have the offset wrong unless your C55 came with optional wheels, as my C55's stock wheels are:
ET 37 front
ET 30 rear

Last edited by rbaker; Jan 18, 2005 at 02:27 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 05:00 AM
  #3  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
yes they will.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 05:10 AM
  #4  
BlackC230Coupe's Avatar
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,403
Likes: 21
From: South Florida
Fast Cars!
of course it will.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 06:50 AM
  #5  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Miscalculated rolling circumference (just edited in my initial post). Difference between stock front and rear setup appears to be 26.7mm (a little over an inch). Will this make make a difference or hurt anything given that the difference will be on the same (rear) axle between left and right?

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
smgC32's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
I believe your formula is incorrect. Yes you can run the front in the rear as the offset is eaten up by difference in wheel width. Problems can be had by running the rear in the front. Why don't you just take off the front wheel and install it on the rear??? to check fitment yourself?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #7  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by smgC32
I believe your formula is incorrect. Yes you can run the front in the rear as the offset is eaten up by difference in wheel width. Problems can be had by running the rear in the front. Why don't you just take off the front wheel and install it on the rear??? to check fitment yourself?
- What do you think is wrong with the formula?
- I am more concerned with circumference than with offset.

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #8  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by rbaker
Can't confirm that, but don't see why the fronts wouldn't fit on the rear, as the front's have much larger brakes. The rear's are just 20mm wider on the outside & 5mm on the inside than the front. I imagine you're considering this for a spare, so it'll probably work. I'd just try swapping to check.

FYI, I think you have the offset wrong unless your C55 came with optional wheels, as my C55's stock wheels are:
ET 37 front
ET 30 rear
My wheels are stock Double Spoke AMG wheels for the C55 and are:
ET 30 front
ET 34 rear
These offsets are stamped on my wheels and listed in the Owner's Manual.
Did you buy your C55 used, or any possibility the dealer swapped wheels w/o your knowledge? I suggest you check again.

Rgds,
Norm

Last edited by noka; Jan 18, 2005 at 01:23 PM.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #9  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 18
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
go check the Mercedes-Benz.com/amg they have the ET listed for each rims.

these are the one's listed for the C55 standard rims


AMG light-alloy wheel (Style IV)
7,5 x 18 ET 37 B6 603 1310 tyre size 225/40 (for FA and RA)
8,5 x 18 ET 34 B6 603 1342 tyre size 245/35 (RA only)
8,5 x 18 ET 30 B6 603 1305 tyre size 245/35 (RA only)
Optional:** tyre size 255/35 (RA only)

Last edited by FrankW; Jan 18, 2005 at 03:17 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #10  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by FrankW
go check the Mercedes-Benz.com/amg they have the ET listed for each rims.

these are the one's listed for the C55 standard rims


AMG light-alloy wheel (Style IV)
7,5 x 18 ET 37 B6 603 1310 tyre size 225/40 (for FA and RA)
8,5 x 18 ET 34 B6 603 1342 tyre size 245/35 (RA only)
8,5 x 18 ET 30 B6 603 1305 tyre size 245/35 (RA only)
Optional:** tyre size 255/35 (RA only)
Thanks for the web-site and I have already seen it. I (and others whose posts I can find on this site) physically removed the stock C55 staggered wheels and confirmed the offsets match what is in the Owner's Manual and what I posted. I choose to believe my Owner's Manual and what I physically see stamped on the wheels over the web-site you posted. YMMV.

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:06 PM
  #11  
rbaker's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Redondo Beach
Z06, M3, Mini Cooper S. Sold: C55
Originally Posted by noka
My wheels are stock Double Spoke AMG wheels for the C55 and are:
ET 30 front
ET 34 rear
These offsets are stamped on my wheels and listed in the Owner's Manual.
Did you buy your C55 used, or any possibility the dealer swapped wheels w/o your knowledge? I suggest you check again.

Rgds,
Norm
No, my car & wheels are original factory AMG. The wheels are made in Austria and have all the factory p/n's & info on the wheel interior. I personally verified these offsets are listed on the inside of the wheel casting. I wouldn't be surprised if the manual is wrong, as it shows the car coming with 245/35/18 rears and every C55 I've seen has 255's.

If your car has 30mm offset front wheels, want to trade!?!?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #12  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by rbaker
No, my car & wheels are original factory AMG. The wheels are made in Austria and have all the factory p/n's & info on the wheel interior. I personally verified these offsets are listed on the inside of the wheel casting. I wouldn't be surprised if the manual is wrong, as it shows the car coming with 245/35/18 rears and every C55 I've seen has 255's.

If your car has 30mm offset front wheels, want to trade!?!?
Just for kicks, I will verify offset, wheel and tire size tonight and post here. I'm starting to think maybe there was some running production change.

By the way (if you choose to believe it), amgpower.com lists for C55:
Front Rims 7.5J x 18 in
Rear Rims 8.5J x 18 in
Front Tires 225/40 ZR 18
Rear Tires 245/35 ZR 18 (CLK55 has 255/35 ZR 18 rears).

Rgds,
Norm

Last edited by noka; Jan 19, 2005 at 12:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #13  
05C55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Well since the wheels are sitting in my garage I decided to actually measure the rolling circumference, the front wheel is 1/4 inch greater than the rear. The wheels are likewise stamped ET 30 front, ET 34 rear and came with 245's in the rear.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 05:39 PM
  #14  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by 05C55
Well since the wheels are sitting in my garage I decided to actually measure the rolling circumference, the front wheel is 1/4 inch greater than the rear. The wheels are likewise stamped ET 30 front, ET 34 rear and came with 245's in the rear.
My calc was 4x your actual measurement. Let's say 0.5" and split the difference. So the question is whether that would cause any problems if rear left and right differed by that much. I am inclined to think not. Your measurement did agree with my calc in the sense that the front circumference is greater than the rear. Thanks for checking your wheel offset and tire size. They agree with my stock sizes. Either the other posters were wrong or there was some running production change.

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 06:05 PM
  #15  
05C55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
I agree that it would probably not affect the car at all. It may wear differently, but my guess is you would have to be using it an awful lot to make any difference at all. As a spare I wouldn't think you wouldn't have any issues.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #16  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by rbaker
No, my car & wheels are original factory AMG. The wheels are made in Austria and have all the factory p/n's & info on the wheel interior. I personally verified these offsets are listed on the inside of the wheel casting. I wouldn't be surprised if the manual is wrong, as it shows the car coming with 245/35/18 rears and every C55 I've seen has 255's.

If your car has 30mm offset front wheels, want to trade!?!?
I just confirmed the following for my C55 (09/04 build date):

Front:
Tire: 225/40 ZR18 92Y P-Zero Rosso
Wheel: 7.5J x 18 H2, ET30
MB p/n A 203 401 4102
Made in Austria

Rear:
Tire: 245/35 ZR18 92Y P-Zero Rosso
Wheel: 8.5J x 18 H2, ET34
MB p/n A 203 401 3902
Made in Austria

Rgds,
Norm

Last edited by noka; Jan 19, 2005 at 12:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 01:04 AM
  #17  
rbaker's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Redondo Beach
Z06, M3, Mini Cooper S. Sold: C55
Originally Posted by noka
I just confirmed the following for my 09/04 build C55:

Front:
Tire: 225/40 ZR18 92Y P-Zero Rosso
Wheel: 7.5J x 18 H2, ET30
MB p/n A 203 401 4102
Made in Austria

Rear:
Tire: 245/35 ZR18 92Y P-Zero Rosso
Wheel: 8.5J x 18 H2, ET34
MB p/n A 203 401 3902
Made in Austria

Rgds,
Norm
OK, so it sounds like AMG did a running change (my build is 05/04), so your offset probably is the new design. That would make sense, as a 30mm offset would widen the track 14mm total & help reduce understeer (a problem I sorely hate in mine). Also the rear tires occasionally rub on a hard bump, so that may be why they changed the rear. When I scan the old AMG catalogs i have, it looks like most all the old 7.5" fronts have 37mm offset, so it seems the 30mm is new.

Mine was only the 2cd C55 that South Bay Mercedes rec'd here in SoCal, and it came with Continental Sport Contact 2's. I don't have a photo of the front rim handy, but the rear shows:
P/N: A 209 401 1502 (normal double spoke you see on C55's)
8.5J x 18 EH2 ET30

Weight wasn't too bad at 26.5 lbs (with a few oz of wheel weights on).
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 10:29 AM
  #18  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by rbaker
OK, so it sounds like AMG did a running change (my build is 05/04), so your offset probably is the new design. That would make sense, as a 30mm offset would widen the track 14mm total & help reduce understeer (a problem I sorely hate in mine). Also the rear tires occasionally rub on a hard bump, so that may be why they changed the rear. When I scan the old AMG catalogs i have, it looks like most all the old 7.5" fronts have 37mm offset, so it seems the 30mm is new.

Mine was only the 2cd C55 that South Bay Mercedes rec'd here in SoCal, and it came with Continental Sport Contact 2's. I don't have a photo of the front rim handy, but the rear shows:
P/N: A 209 401 1502 (normal double spoke you see on C55's)
8.5J x 18 EH2 ET30

Weight wasn't too bad at 26.5 lbs (with a few oz of wheel weights on).
Thanks for confirming that. I suspected something like a running production change. We both can't be crazy!

All the brochures I have (two hard-copy color for "C-Class" and "AMG" and online E-brochure on MBUSA) show "245" rear for C55 (but "255" for CLK55). If there were no rub problem, I would prefer the 255, for aesthetics really. Perhaps if it causes a problem for you, you could convince them to swap your wheels and tires, if you even care about it.

The funny thing is that the 255x35-18 is closer in rolling circumference to the front 225x40-18 than the 245x35-18 is. That's why I was asking the question about using a front as a spare, because if used on the rear there would be a greater difference between left and right rolling circumference with e.g. my setup vs. your setup. So, I am still not quite sure if it will hurt anything.

Rgds,
Norm

Last edited by noka; Jan 19, 2005 at 10:33 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #19  
smgC32's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
Have you ever measured the difference in RC on a donut spare?! If it is used for the purpose a spare tire was made for, don't worry about it. If you plan on driving the car hard, ESP will surely be affected as both rear tires are rolling at different rates.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #20  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by smgC32
Have you ever measured the difference in RC on a donut spare?! If it is used for the purpose a spare tire was made for, don't worry about it. If you plan on driving the car hard, ESP will surely be affected as both rear tires are rolling at different rates.
Yes, I did think about it but that would require inflating it (to some specified pressure) and it's too damn cold where I live right now to play with that!

However, I could always use one of my snows because the 'RC' of those is also quite close to the stock setup. There is a different tread pattern of course, but I think that is not really signficant for temporary spare use.

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #21  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by rbaker
OK, so it sounds like AMG did a running change (my build is 05/04), so your offset probably is the new design. ...
Just curious if the plackard inside your driver's door jamb says 255 for rear tire size (mine does say 245 to match what I have).

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #22  
smgC32's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
Is it possible that the dearler swapped the wheels with a CLK55? Maybe they needed to chrome a set of C55 wheels and when you bought the car, they gave you CLK55 wheels as they look the same, but have a larger rear tire. Someone should check the stock offset of a set of CLK wheels in the CLK forum.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:24 AM
  #23  
noka's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 3
From: MA
'24 Porsche Macan
Originally Posted by smgC32
Is it possible that the dearler swapped the wheels with a CLK55? Maybe they needed to chrome a set of C55 wheels and when you bought the car, they gave you CLK55 wheels as they look the same, but have a larger rear tire. Someone should check the stock offset of a set of CLK wheels in the CLK forum.
If you are asking "RBAKER", I doubt it, ... but he could confirm. I asked him to check plackard on door jamb.

Rgds,
Norm
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:47 AM
  #24  
rbaker's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 1
From: Redondo Beach
Z06, M3, Mini Cooper S. Sold: C55
The door jamb on mine lists 245's for the rear also, so no help there. On the other hand, all the other C55's I've seen at my dealer here had 255's on the rear just like mine. Maybe it was as simple as tire availability or the need for more traction? This thing still lights up the 255's like nobody's business, so it could use 265 or 275's if they could fit with a little fender rolling. Of course it would probably need 245 or 255's on the front then to be balanced in corners.

I've actually thought about asking the dealer to check or swap the wheels (mostly to get the new offset, not narrower tire), but I'm probably going to wind up just buying another set of wider, lightweight wheels soon with slightly different offset. It's just difficult finding wheels to fit this thing that are light & have correct brake clearance.

Back to your questions about a spare... our cars don't have a limited slip diff, so really no issue about different diameter tires on the rear for temporary use. The slight suspension height change is not an issue. I also got to verify this the hard way after a flat right rear.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2005 | 01:55 AM
  #25  
smgC32's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 815
Likes: 2
All in 7.5" front and 8.5" rear, the C32's offset is ET37 front and ET34 rear in a 17" wheel. The AMG double spoke 209's in 17" are ET37 front and ET30 rear. It seams that the generic AMG double spoke new design is made for the aftermarket to fit a variety of Mercedes vehicles in the ET37/30 fitment. The C55's ET30 front and ET34 rear is rather unusual and maybe they make a special wheel just for this application in order to widen the track in front, and narrow the track in the rear compared to the ET37/30 for more neutral handling. Go to the dealer and look up the part in the computer system that should list offsets for all the vehicles in question as stock offerings.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE