C280 vs. C36/43?
08-24-2005, 09:06 PM
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NorCal - SF
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Originally Posted by E55Power
How do they compare? Do they compare? Is the AMG worth the price, when the budget is tight?
08-24-2005, 09:21 PM
#3
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 227
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1998 C43, White over two tone
You could probably get a C280 in good shape, and pay for a set of monoblocks that most people would fall for it being a C43. But the last poster is right, they are completely different cars and the performance of the AMG is completely off the charts better. I think it is one of the cool things about the car that 90% of people out there don't realize what they are being passed by. They just assume it is a clean benz, but the car people realize you have something rare and special.
All that being said, a nice C280 would be one hell of a nice car for your first car, a far cry from my Altima.
Jeff
All that being said, a nice C280 would be one hell of a nice car for your first car, a far cry from my Altima.
Jeff
08-24-2005, 09:30 PM
#4
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NorCal - SF
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
honestly, if you are on a tight budget, pass on the AMGs. the maintenance alone can kill your pocketbook. not to mention the cost of insurance is higher as well. ANY MB is a helluva first car. 
08-24-2005, 10:21 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2002 C32 Black/Charcoal
Originally Posted by aintME
honestly, if you are on a tight budget, pass on the AMGs. the maintenance alone can kill your pocketbook. not to mention the cost of insurance is higher as well. ANY MB is a helluva first car.
Unless you are a Geritol motorist, find the bux and go for the AMG. Having extensively driven the 280, it is a dog compared to the 36 or 43.
08-24-2005, 10:40 PM
#6
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NorCal - SF
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Originally Posted by Vomit
Actually, Geico (and most other insurance companies) do not consider the C-Class AMGs to be "high risk."
08-24-2005, 11:05 PM
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,469
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
C55AMG W203; 330i E90
Here in HK, AMG C-Class dealer maintenance package is doubled than non AMG C-Class. AMG owners also tend to drive hard , thus, potentially increase frequency of parts replacement -> high maint costs. Guess AMGs drinking more fuel is not an issue if you were in USA. And, then, it is more excited when you start to mod your car.
Trending Topics
08-24-2005, 11:07 PM
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mid West
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 C36 AMG
Originally Posted by aintME
i guess i need to switch insurance companies (AAA). my C36/C43 was probably the 2nd most expensive car(s) to insure.
yupe,
AlltState, Progressive, NationWide, and some other company always charge premium for AMG car over non-AMG.
Regardz,
08-24-2005, 11:09 PM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Mid West
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1997 C36 AMG
Originally Posted by E55Power
How do they compare? Do they compare? Is the AMG worth the price, when the budget is tight?
Try to find one with good service history and more importantly try to find one with warranty remaining.
Whichever you decide, do some research, then test drive and decide.
But let me warn you, driving AMG is very addictive :P
Regardz,
