C36 AMG, C43 AMG (W202) 1995 - 2000

C36 on the track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-29-2008, 10:54 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
AMG140.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Stg3 B5S4-C55 AMG
When I was shopping for a c36, I drove one that had a H&R/Bils Sport combo and it rode the twisties very nice.

When he first pulled up I was surprised how low the car was...like barely a pinky clearance for the F&R, but after a few minutes of driving it felt great.

Body roll was minimal compared to stock height. Razor turn ins were what sold me.

I'm hoping to get Lensolo's Camber kit soon before I install my kit.

My Audi S4 pals say the same thing about the Eibach's. Good for a DD, but only a tad firmer than the OEM springs.
Old 06-02-2008, 01:45 AM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
silence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds like airplane
i need a rear spring that is firmer and lowers a bit less than the eibach...

what should i get?
Old 06-04-2008, 03:47 AM
  #28  
Super Member
 
jjay911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1991 300sl 5 speed manual
Talking

Originally Posted by speedybenz
I can get you a set of camber arms in the next week if you would like. See: www.speedybnz.com. for info and pics.

Just let me know.

Jeff
I may be interested...

I just picked up my first C36. Cant wait to start improving her...
Old 06-04-2008, 11:28 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
svt ricco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,148
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1999 C43 AMG
Originally Posted by silence
i need a rear spring that is firmer and lowers a bit less than the eibach...

what should i get?
have you seen the stance of a euro spec spring?
Old 06-04-2008, 11:57 AM
  #30  
Member
Thread Starter
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 R320 CDI, 2010 FJ Cruiser, CTS-V
Originally Posted by silence
i need a rear spring that is firmer and lowers a bit less than the eibach...

what should i get?
I am switching to H&R Sport springs and the tallest spring pads that the factory makes. I measured mine and my car has the shortest pads in there front and rear.

I am also contemplating dumping the Bilstein sports and going to adjustable Koni's front and rear.

Does anyone have the factory C36 springs still hanging around? I may give those a try since I am going to be buying the spring compressor tool anyway.
Old 06-04-2008, 11:58 AM
  #31  
Member
Thread Starter
 
fstshrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 R320 CDI, 2010 FJ Cruiser, CTS-V
I called H&R two days ago and spoke to them. They said that the H&R sports are progressive on the C36.


Originally Posted by Dr. C36
All the documentation I have seen has shows that the H&Rs are linear both sport and race, (same is true in the bmw community) and eibachs/intrax/vogtland are all progressive rate. Thats why for true performance driving the H&Rs are better, but for every day use the eibachs are better. I will note, on some cars the bilstein sports & eibach springs aren't the best combo due just not meshing well together, but on others its a good combo. If you have documentation proving otherwise please provide it.

On the E36 M3s for example, the combo 90% run who use bilstein sports is H&R springs b/c the eibachs would give the car odd quirks at times (sometimes feeling floaty at the limit & etc) so people opted for bilsteins. If they ran eibachs they'd usually run koni. But thats really only an issue on that specific model, on others people seem to run them fine.
Old 06-04-2008, 03:37 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Dr. C36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1996 C36 AMG
Originally Posted by fstshrk
I called H&R two days ago and spoke to them. They said that the H&R sports are progressive on the C36.

wow, thats the first time I've heard of H&R doing that, almost always linear. Nice find. Thx for the clearup
Old 06-27-2008, 04:58 PM
  #33  
Member
 
M104-AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
W124 E36T AMG; W124 500E
Originally Posted by ProjectC55
The 5 speed tranny is stronger than the 4 speed and has much better gearing.

My friend just chucked the 4speed auto out of his turbocharged C36 and threw in the 5 speed trany from the M113 cars with a bell housing from a 97 W210 E320 which helped it bolt right on. I'll be politically correct and say that these trannies are not bullet proof unless you give them constant fluid chgs.

By the way the 5 speed tranny in the C43 is rumored to be the same tranny in the SL 600.
Can you give us more details about the 5-speed tranny from a M113 with a 1997 W210 E320 bell housing ?

How did he integrate the electronics of that 5-speed ?

Do you have a link or contract info ?

Thanks,
:-) neil
Old 10-18-2008, 04:20 PM
  #34  
Newbie
 
AMGC36Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1995 C36 AMG
Red face C36 on the track

Don't do it. You don't have enough money for the repairs.

First, they run hot, temp wise, all the time. Second, nose heavy so handling isn't so great. Third, front brakes & rotors are so expensive you really will be shocked. Fourth, the heat generated by the engine and front brakes will ruin the finish on the AMG wheels, causing cracking in the finish (and that was with normal driving, so mine have been refinished 3 times).

Then there is just all the other stuff that occurs with a C36 that track driving will reveal - bushings will fail and are expensive to replace, etc.

Good luck though.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: C36 on the track



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.