C43 VS SL500 V12
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
C43 VS SL500 V12
So I raced my friends SL500 and to my surprise I was keeping up damn good
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
So I raced my friends SL500 and to my surprise I was keeping up damn good
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
If it's r230 SL500, the c43 should walk it. I ran my friend's off a 40 also, i was slowly walking the entire way through to 115mph. R129 is a different story, those might be quicker thanks to DOHC and a non-detuned engine... lol
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
So I raced my friends SL500 and to my surprise I was keeping up damn good
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
From a 40mph roll, I got the jump but he was never able to pass me. We went up to 100 id say, was pretty much dead even
From a 70mph roll he got the jump but I honestly couldn't see him pulling away that bad, maybe slightly. He had the top of coz its a convertible and also Im misfiring on three cylinders and I have a bad 02 sensor
Fast car, I wasn't expecting my car to be able to keep up.
* NOTE: This was NOT an STI, an STI would SMOKE our C43's
Stock WRX stats are pretty much the same as our C43's, here is a road and track test:
Road & Track May, 2001 issue
0-30 2.0 sec, 0-60 5.7 sec
1/4 mile-14.4 @ 95.4mph,
Braking 60-0 138ft
WRX STI stats:
Car and Driver
June 2003
STi:
0-60 4.6
0-100 12.4
0-130 24.5
1/4 mile 13.2@103mph
5mph-60mph 5.8; top speed 145
braking 70-0 166ft
Noise level (dBA) idle 45, 70mph 74
Our C43's are notorious for the stopping power, we smoke them there:
its 112 ft stopping distance from 60 mph is good enough to topple a Ferrari F355
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sounds like airplane
Funny, I just raced a tricked out WRX *(intake, exhaust, suspension, and stupid gauges everywhere) pretty much the same scenario, from a 40 MPH roll in I was actually pulling on him all the way to 110 MPH before I decided he had enough! I'm betting from a stop light start he would probably beat me but I was WHOOPING his *** when we did the roll in. By the time we were @ 110MPH I was about 2.5 car lengths ahead (thanks AMG for all the torque ) My C43 surprises me every day and its pretty much stock (haven't added just DELETED )
* NOTE: This was NOT an STI, an STI would SMOKE our C43's
Stock WRX stats are pretty much the same as our C43's, here is a road and track test:
Road & Track May, 2001 issue
0-30 2.0 sec, 0-60 5.7 sec
1/4 mile-14.4 @ 95.4mph,
Braking 60-0 138ft
WRX STI stats:
Car and Driver
June 2003
STi:
0-60 4.6
0-100 12.4
0-130 24.5
1/4 mile 13.2@103mph
5mph-60mph 5.8; top speed 145
braking 70-0 166ft
Noise level (dBA) idle 45, 70mph 74
Our C43's are notorious for the stopping power, we smoke them there:
its 112 ft stopping distance from 60 mph is good enough to topple a Ferrari F355
* NOTE: This was NOT an STI, an STI would SMOKE our C43's
Stock WRX stats are pretty much the same as our C43's, here is a road and track test:
Road & Track May, 2001 issue
0-30 2.0 sec, 0-60 5.7 sec
1/4 mile-14.4 @ 95.4mph,
Braking 60-0 138ft
WRX STI stats:
Car and Driver
June 2003
STi:
0-60 4.6
0-100 12.4
0-130 24.5
1/4 mile 13.2@103mph
5mph-60mph 5.8; top speed 145
braking 70-0 166ft
Noise level (dBA) idle 45, 70mph 74
Our C43's are notorious for the stopping power, we smoke them there:
its 112 ft stopping distance from 60 mph is good enough to topple a Ferrari F355
hmm- why make fun of the wrx? who knows what was up with that car, but most tuned wrx (sti or not will beat up on a remotely stock c43 pretty good). Maybe they weren't even racing?
My non-sti (and quite ricey looking I might add- but we bought it that way as a repo) car made 286 awhp on dyno dynamics... good enough to beat a c43 by 15+ lengths in a quarter mile.
As a past bugeye owner I cry a little bit every time I see one of the new ones (what is the world coming to that subaru has to build that crap?).
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
hmm- why make fun of the wrx? who knows what was up with that car, but most tuned wrx (sti or not will beat up on a remotely stock c43 pretty good). Maybe they weren't even racing?
My non-sti (and quite ricey looking I might add- but we bought it that way as a repo) car made 286 awhp on dyno dynamics... good enough to beat a c43 by 15+ lengths in a quarter mile.
As a past bugeye owner I cry a little bit every time I see one of the new ones (what is the world coming to that subaru has to build that crap?).
My non-sti (and quite ricey looking I might add- but we bought it that way as a repo) car made 286 awhp on dyno dynamics... good enough to beat a c43 by 15+ lengths in a quarter mile.
As a past bugeye owner I cry a little bit every time I see one of the new ones (what is the world coming to that subaru has to build that crap?).
Not making fun of a WRX... I LOVE THEM. And they were DEFINITELY racing, I do not like the RICEY gauges and such but the car is GREAT.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sounds like airplane
race cars have ricey gauges... I suppose you'd also hate my C43 (see picture). Personally, I prefer to not have my car blow up because I'm too stupid to know why I need to monitor things.
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sounds like airplane
I spent about $4k on my bugeye and it made 50hp/50tq more than a stock c43 on the same dyno throughout the powerband. I won't get into how much less it weighed or how inefficient our auto transmission is.
You are right that a stock c43 is slower than hell from 0-80 though
also, unless someone deliberately down-badged that car it's a v8
#14
MBWorld Fanatic!
By ricey gauges I mean 4"+ gauge faces, I understand the need for gauges I had plenty in my '67 cutlass supreme but they were much smaller and I had them tucked away below the dash much like yours are instead of SHOWING them off rice style. Gauges are for you to see not the guy 100ft behind you
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm sorry, but a 300 hp C43 hung with a 400 hp V12 SL??
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SL500
#22
MBWorld Fanatic!
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
I still have trouble figuring out how you could run even with him with all of the issues you had listed unless he has the same problems. I could see you winning a 0-60 battle. Could also be a 93-95 model, which apparently had the older 4 speed, which could be a disadvantage.
#24
MBWorld Fanatic!