C43 Sedan Tested by C&D
#1
C43 Sedan Tested by C&D
Just as expected, it's a bit faster than the C43 Coupe (weight difference). But I am surprised that it's almost one and half second faster than C450 from 0-130mph, seems like the 9g-tronic has a much better gearing.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
#3
Just as expected, it's a bit faster than the C43 Coupe (weight difference). But I am surprised that it's almost one and half second faster than C450 from 0-130mph, seems like the 9g-tronic has a much better gearing.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
I would be very surprised if the numbers were incorrect.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3coupe2017.pdf
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3sedan2017.pdf
#9
The C&D test sheets for both the sedan and coupe have curb weights including corner weights. The particular sedan that was tested has the panoramic roof option which is probably why it weighs the same as the coupe.
I would be very surprised if the numbers were incorrect.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3coupe2017.pdf
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3sedan2017.pdf
I would be very surprised if the numbers were incorrect.
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3coupe2017.pdf
http://media.caranddriver.com/files/...3sedan2017.pdf
The 3727 lbs car must be without the Pano roof and 18" base wheels. Although it does not state that on the MB website.