2017 C43 results are in!
#26
#27
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Can anyone explain why the dyno graphs vary so much between AMR, OE and Eurocharged? They all advertise similar gains, I thought the numbers would be much closer.
Stock rating:
OE - 264whp, 276wtq
AMR - 310whp, 340wtq
Eurocharged - 344whp, 369wtq
Tuned rating:
OE - 313whp/374wtq
AMR - 390whp/440wtq
Eurocharged - 390whp/448wtq
#28
Can anyone explain why the dyno graphs vary so much between AMR, OE and Eurocharged? They all advertise similar gains, I thought the numbers would be much closer.
Stock rating:
OE - 264whp, 276wtq
AMR - 310whp, 340wtq
Eurocharged - 344whp, 369wtq
Tuned rating:
OE - 313whp/374wtq
AMR - 390whp/440wtq
Eurocharged - 390whp/448wtq
Stock rating:
OE - 264whp, 276wtq
AMR - 310whp, 340wtq
Eurocharged - 344whp, 369wtq
Tuned rating:
OE - 313whp/374wtq
AMR - 390whp/440wtq
Eurocharged - 390whp/448wtq
Every dyno reads differently and is set up to read power differently. That is why you focus more on the delta (gain) that the overall number because the final number means nothing if you do not know where you started.
Also, as far as I know OE and Eurocharged are calculating crank hp while AMR's gains are at the ground. Here is a link to another dyno sheet for reference:
http://shop.amrperformance.com/2017/...mance-reviews/