2017 C43 results are in! - Page 2

Jun 14, 2017 | 01:00 PM

#26

ShazV6

Super Member

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 571

Likes: 71

17' C43 Coupe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gungaslow

Local guy here at track in newhamshire hit 11.88 on his c43 with just AMR tune and it was about 63 deg.. I saw it with my own eyes.. that's why I'm gonna go with AMR!!

SWEET!! What was his trap?

Jun 14, 2017 | 01:17 PM

#27

SoCalC43

Thread Starter

Junior Member

Joined: Jun 2017

Posts: 34

Likes: 6

From: Delray Beach, FL

2020 AMG C43 Sedan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gungaslow

Local guy here at track in newhamshire hit 11.88 on his c43 with just AMR tune and it was about 63 deg.. I saw it with my own eyes.. that's why I'm gonna go with AMR!!

Can anyone explain why the dyno graphs vary so much between AMR, OE and Eurocharged? They all advertise similar gains, I thought the numbers would be much closer.

Stock rating:
OE - 264whp, 276wtq
AMR - 310whp, 340wtq
Eurocharged - 344whp, 369wtq

Tuned rating:
OE - 313whp/374wtq
AMR - 390whp/440wtq
Eurocharged - 390whp/448wtq

Jun 14, 2017 | 01:50 PM

#28

getmercd

Member

Joined: Oct 2016

Posts: 178

Likes: 41

Mercedes Benz C43 AMG

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCalC43

Every dyno reads differently and is set up to read power differently. That is why you focus more on the delta (gain) that the overall number because the final number means nothing if you do not know where you started.

Also, as far as I know OE and Eurocharged are calculating crank hp while AMR's gains are at the ground. Here is a link to another dyno sheet for reference:

http://shop.amrperformance.com/2017/...mance-reviews/