2017 C43 results are in!
I'm a new member and just took delivery of a 2017 C43 Sedan. I've done a bunch of research on this site for reviews and tuning options so I'm glad to finally be a member and I'm looking forward to getting to know some of you guys!
Car and Driver just posted results from their instrument testing and I'm impressed! The car is much quicker than I expected, here's the link:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
0-60 in 4.1 and 1/4 mile in 12.7 @ 110
A lot of people say the C450 is the same as the C43 but that is definitely not true as I've never seen a stock C450 do better than 4.5 0-60 from any reliable source. The new 9 speed transmission and the other changes must make a huge difference. I knew the C43 would be quicker than the C450 but I was surprised that it beat it by so much. For reference, here is a link for the C450 test results:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mg-test-review
Please let me know your thoughts...
Here is a bit better of a result for the c450. Gearing makes up for a few tenths, this is true.
Launch control would be really nice. Do you notice in manual mode it seems like 1st gear fuel cutoff is way before redline? I just got my car a couple weeks ago so I'm still trying to find the best launching technique.
done.
Launch technique plays little in acceleration results.
Last edited by alexasa; Jun 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM.
I'm a new member and just took delivery of a 2017 C43 Sedan. I've done a bunch of research on this site for reviews and tuning options so I'm glad to finally be a member and I'm looking forward to getting to know some of you guys!
Car and Driver just posted results from their instrument testing and I'm impressed! The car is much quicker than I expected, here's the link:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
0-60 in 4.1 and 1/4 mile in 12.7 @ 110
A lot of people say the C450 is the same as the C43 but that is definitely not true as I've never seen a stock C450 do better than 4.5 0-60 from any reliable source. The new 9 speed transmission and the other changes must make a huge difference. I knew the C43 would be quicker than the C450 but I was surprised that it beat it by so much. For reference, here is a link for the C450 test results:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mg-test-review
Please let me know your thoughts...
Really isn't that much difference between the cars besides the optional performance exhaust and the much better transmission.
The car definitely needs launch control though.
Trending Topics
I'm a new member and just took delivery of a 2017 C43 Sedan. I've done a bunch of research on this site for reviews and tuning options so I'm glad to finally be a member and I'm looking forward to getting to know some of you guys!
Car and Driver just posted results from their instrument testing and I'm impressed! The car is much quicker than I expected, here's the link:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...an-test-review
0-60 in 4.1 and 1/4 mile in 12.7 @ 110
A lot of people say the C450 is the same as the C43 but that is definitely not true as I've never seen a stock C450 do better than 4.5 0-60 from any reliable source. The new 9 speed transmission and the other changes must make a huge difference. I knew the C43 would be quicker than the C450 but I was surprised that it beat it by so much. For reference, here is a link for the C450 test results:
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...mg-test-review
Please let me know your thoughts...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

A company puts down gains, proves it with videos at the track as well as numerous customers putting down the same track times including one guy on instagram going 11.9 but something seems fishy?
https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...ttached-4.html
Granted not all customers have the ability to go to the track with other companies tunes... but yea you get the idea.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...ttached-4.html
Granted not all customers have the ability to go to the track with other companies tunes... but yea you get the idea.
as well as they show different dates, times, etc.... not to mention no video of these passes whatsoever. I would rather see a company post a video with a slip then just a random slip with no other proof 
Also if you read on in that link you posted, I would agree with this guy who commented on that same post, as he is 100% right, see below comment:
This comment definitely has me laughing

A company puts down gains, proves it with videos at the track as well as numerous customers putting down the same track times including one guy on instagram going 11.9 but something seems fishy?

I'm not advocating for eurocharged either.
The only comparison I give a company validity for is hitting the 1/4 stock. Tuning - hitting it again the same day (if not similar conditioned day) and showing the numbers.
Dynos show how a specific car increased it's power. You cannot compare it to another dyno or other cars unless they used the exact same dyno.
Anyways, AMR should be putting down better numbers with their claimed figures, IMO. It's still an impressive gain - I just think their claimed improvements might be a bit idealized.
as well as they show different dates, times, etc.... not to mention no video of these passes whatsoever. I would rather see a company post a video with a slip then just a random slip with no other proof 
Also if you read on in that link you posted, I would agree with this guy who commented on that same post, as he is 100% right, see below comment:
https://mbworld.org/forums/c450-c43-...upe-track.html
And for the power ill stick with Eurocharge, once again nothing against AMR customers and their tune or OE. I guess personal preference. But if we are talking factual track numbers, Eurocharge has got it.
Last edited by ShazV6; Jun 14, 2017 at 12:00 PM.







