Air Intake




1) The MST intake is not an enclosure. I would call it more of a two-stepped heat shield and would say that the BMS intake heat shields cover better and would be more effective than the MST ones.
2) The MST filters are much smaller than the BMS filters.
3) The sensor extensions are much neater and more secure on the BMS intake.
4) The BMS turbo inlet pipes should flow much better than the stock ones. The MST does not come with turbo inlet pipes.
5) It would seem that the "ram air" effect from the stock intake plenums into the MST "enclosure" would be more restrictive than the open air BMS design (which uses no parts, but in fact deletes parts). Cool air gets rammed into the engine bay through the same source/place anyway.
6) BMS needs you to cut the engine cover, that bothers me.
If I were to do this again I would buy the BMS system and a spare engine cover to keep at home knowing I can revert, or leave the cover off entirely.
Hope this helps others make an educated decision of their own.
Last edited by TModelle; Jul 25, 2019 at 08:48 AM.
The BMS inlet pipes are longer/higher and you can't use the original pre-box ducting anymore. If you don't use the ducting, then you don't need the "box" of the MST. If you don't use the "box" of the MST, you might as well use the BMS filters. So in the end you are left with - BMS.
I just had to buy the MST to find this out first hand.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The BMS inlet pipes are longer/higher and you can't use the original pre-box ducting anymore. If you don't use the ducting, then you don't need the "box" of the MST. If you don't use the "box" of the MST, you might as well use the BMS filters. So in the end you are left with - BMS.
I just had to buy the MST to find this out first hand.
that would be the ideal set-up.
what a proper product release thread is: https://www.audizine.com/forum/showt...-Available-now
forum advertisers here get away with murder
Last edited by alexasa; Jul 29, 2019 at 03:31 PM.




"
"
