C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AMS Test C63

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #1  
Bones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 354
Likes: 45
From: Chicago
e55
AMS Test C63

From another board

In the latest issue german AMS test C63 AMG:


0-100km/h 4.7 sec
0-160km/h 10,3 sec
0-200km/h 15,6 sec

Slalom: 63,7 km/h
Lane change: 130,7 km/h

Brake distance 100-0km/h 36 meter
Brake distance 190-0km/h 130 meter

Tires: Pirelli P Zero

Total rating: 4 stars out of 5

-------------------

Two issues ago they test drove M3 V8:


0-100km/h 4.9 sec
0-160km/h 10,6 sec
0-200km/h 16,7 sec

Slalom: 66,7 km/h
Lane change: 138 km/h

Brake distance 100-0km/h 37 meter
Brake distance 190-0km/h 127 meter

Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport

Total rating: 5 stars out of 5

C63 is heavy 1803KG, almost 4000lbs!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #2  
BoBcanada's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,793
Likes: 0
From: Toronto,ON
AMG
C63 is as heavy as an M5.... Booooooooooo! I was also expecting a better time 0-120 mph ( 200kmh) Its kinda on a slow side. Well lets see if tuners can do their magic.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:00 PM
  #3  
7 speed SMG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
06 E60 M5
AMS usually get slow #'s... relax, the C63 is going to kick ***. I'm disapointed by the Slalom and Lane change speeds compared to the M3...
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #4  
Sunny55's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Taipei
2005 SL55 AMG
Originally Posted by 7 speed SMG
AMS usually get slow #'s... relax, the C63 is going to kick ***. I'm disapointed by the Slalom and Lane change speeds compared to the M3...
The C63 is def going to kicka$$, no one will argue with that. It's true that AMS numbers are usually a bit slower, but it's more realistic for real world driving. I think those numbers are actually pretty good considering if the C63 is really close to 4000lbs. In the straight, i'm very impressed.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #5  
Zod's Avatar
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
any one else not notice the tires!
i have p zero and i ma not happy with them
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 08:23 PM
  #6  
jtc55's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: chicagoland
08 E63
Originally Posted by Zod
any one else not notice the tires!
i have p zero and i ma not happy with them
i agree, i wish AMG would put Michelin PS2 on their wheels
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #7  
user 76208202's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
CLK550
Holy moly...how heavy is the C63? If it's anywhere past 3850 then GT-R here i come!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #8  
Hakk403's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Calgary/Helsinki
1994 E320
Talking

Originally Posted by Zod
any one else not notice the tires!
i have p zero and i ma not happy with them
On friday I had my second flat p zero in 4 months.

I'm dissapointed in the numbers as well, I thought it would surpass the M3 in handling this year.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #9  
TopGun32's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 10
From: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Originally Posted by Sunny55
The C63 is def going to kicka$$, no one will argue with that. It's true that AMS numbers are usually a bit slower, but it's more realistic for real world driving. I think those numbers are actually pretty good considering if the C63 is really close to 4000lbs. In the straight, i'm very impressed.
guys we don't know how they tested the weight..

let's not consider that source the final one.

Once I see on it several published mags and official specs.. than we can compare.

also.. keep in mind they different days they tested the vehicles..

it clearly makes a reference that the M3 and C63 were tested on 2 different occasions..

not making excuses.. lets wait for a head to head comparison on the same day, track, conditiions, weather
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #10  
spr's Avatar
spr
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
I have the new p zero's and am very happy with them. Bear in mind these are the NEW p zero's not rossos or any other type
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #11  
Harsany's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta , Canada
2006 E55 Black on Black
The C63 is nice, but too heavy. Straight line it's great, but it's weight will be a problem when trying to out perform the M3. I'll have to drive both, but I'm afriad the M3 sedan is going to be a better overhaul performance sedan.

Last edited by Harsany; Oct 27, 2007 at 08:33 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 04:07 AM
  #12  
user 76208202's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
CLK550
Originally Posted by Harsany
The C63 is nice, but too heavy. Straight line it's great, but it's weight will be a problem when trying to out perform the M3. I'll have to drive both, but I'm afriad the M3 sedan is going to be a better overhaul performance sedan.

For a sedan it's not that bad....plus with it's power it's A ok for me. The M3 is to water'd down and no fun. BMW M basically busted out a high-revving HONDA!!!!!!!!!!


BTW how much does the C63 weigh? 40xx?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 05:21 AM
  #13  
Zod's Avatar
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Originally Posted by spr
I have the new p zero's and am very happy with them. Bear in mind these are the NEW p zero's not rossos or any other type
I have the rosso which do you have?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #14  
spr's Avatar
spr
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
the new pirelli p zero's that's what they're called. Rossos suck. They're so new there're no specs on tire rack yet.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #15  
R_Rated's Avatar
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Volvo S60R
It's interesting that the volvo S60R's come with these same tires and have the same complaints on a totally different car.

Last edited by R_Rated; Oct 28, 2007 at 12:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007 | 11:24 PM
  #16  
ndabunka's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
No longer car shopping...
Originally Posted by Bones
From another board

In the latest issue german AMS test C63 AMG:


0-100km/h 4.7 sec
0-160km/h 10,3 sec
0-200km/h 15,6 sec

Slalom: 63,7 km/h
Lane change: 130,7 km/h

Brake distance 100-0km/h 36 meter
Brake distance 190-0km/h 130 meter

Tires: Pirelli P Zero

Total rating: 4 stars out of 5

-------------------

Two issues ago they test drove M3 V8:


0-100km/h 4.9 sec
0-160km/h 10,6 sec
0-200km/h 16,7 sec

Slalom: 66,7 km/h
Lane change: 138 km/h

Brake distance 100-0km/h 37 meter
Brake distance 190-0km/h 127 meter

Tires: Michelin Pilot Sport

Total rating: 5 stars out of 5

C63 is heavy 1803KG, almost 4000lbs!!!!
OK, I don't get it. The C63 is faster (straight line), quicker (slalom) and EVEN stops faster than the M. Why does the M get 5 stars and the C only gets 4? Biased reporting?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #17  
j7own's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
TBD
Originally Posted by ndabunka
OK, I don't get it. The C63 is faster (straight line), quicker (slalom) and EVEN stops faster than the M. Why does the M get 5 stars and the C only gets 4? Biased reporting?
Slalom isn't quicker. It's in km/h.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.