C63 gets picked by R&T over M3/ISF/RS-4
they got 12.5 @ 114.4, the M3 was way behind, not even in the 12's, at 13.0 @ 110.4.... A chipped 335i will smoke the new M3 sedan acceleration wise, a friend of mine ran 12.3 @ 114 in his 335i will just a ecu upgrade...
But keep in mind that the M3's number seems too high. I guess they had some problems launching it.
I just wanna see how M-DCT could bring up the M3's number as in Europe they have tested it from 0-200km/h and it was a full second quikcer than manual!
they got 12.5 @ 114.4, the M3 was way behind, not even in the 12's, at 13.0 @ 110.4.... A chipped 335i will smoke the new M3 sedan acceleration wise, a friend of mine ran 12.3 @ 114 in his 335i will just a ecu upgrade...The C63 may not have turbos to increase boost, but it has left many horses on the table for future use.
Love the N54 motor.. but there in the last 2 weeks "hell broke loose" with BWM N.A. coming hard on the Piggy Back tunes.
I'm not sure it I want to take that risk with a JBX, SSTT, Procede, Helix ect.
Maybe only the Dinan ECU tune with FMIC and Oil Cooler.
Its not going to stop the N54 tuners, but many are thinking twice about the V8 M3.
is it the biggest advantage for the M cars.. they have LSD's?
Bottom line.. it was a head to head comparison and they must of done multiple runs and comes down to the driver.
I would say Car Mag editors have way more experience most of the potential drivers of the superb M3.
my point: Don't expect the manul M3 to be faster.
M-DCT Yes!. 1 extra gear, super fast shifts.. I will be very close to the C63 and IS-F.
Last edited by lauer87; May 5, 2008 at 12:41 AM.



