C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Got my C63 today. Holy Sh!!!t

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-03-2008, 10:09 AM
  #126  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Last Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 BMW 650ci
Originally Posted by ldangeli
Um, when you own an F car, as many of us have or do, you don't buy it for the daily driver. That is what AMG or M's or RS's are for. But to compare the ride, handling and suspension of say a 360, or 430 to that of a C63? No doubt the C63 is a beast, no doubt. So is my ML63, but, c'mon. MB quality over Ferrari or Pagani or any other F car for that matter..

Enjoy the new C, if your opinion it is better than any other Supercar or High end you've owned, god bless and good luck.
thank you.....you are one of the ppl that dosnt make me feel crazy in this thread
Old 06-03-2008, 11:58 AM
  #127  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jpohl402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PHX/PIE/OMA ---> Yes, all three
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
E55 then E63, now back to an E55
Originally Posted by Korn55
I will take better pics when it is clean. If you have ever driven a 360 you would know it's not the fastest car. It's the overall feel of the car and the look that makes it such a different machine.
360's have little torque so they are sllloowww.......
BUT he is spot-on about the feel/sound/look/rear engine characteristics that make it an enjoyable ride.....
Old 06-03-2008, 01:04 PM
  #128  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Last Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'08 BMW 650ci
Originally Posted by jpohl402
360's have little torque so they are sllloowww.......
BUT he is spot-on about the feel/sound/look/rear engine characteristics that make it an enjoyable ride.....
yea and thats a 360

the 430 is really a whole new animal compared to the 360
Old 06-03-2008, 02:54 PM
  #129  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jpohl402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PHX/PIE/OMA ---> Yes, all three
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
E55 then E63, now back to an E55
Originally Posted by Last Emperor
yea and thats a 360

the 430 is really a whole new animal compared to the 360
Yes much different!
Old 06-03-2008, 03:12 PM
  #130  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by jpohl402
360's have little torque so they are sllloowww.......
BUT he is spot-on about the feel/sound/look/rear engine characteristics that make it an enjoyable ride.....
mid engine
Old 06-03-2008, 03:35 PM
  #131  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jpohl402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: PHX/PIE/OMA ---> Yes, all three
Posts: 2,052
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
E55 then E63, now back to an E55
Originally Posted by ItalianStallion
My dad has a lot of seat time in my Corvette Z06. He also owns a Gallardo. After driving my Vette on highways and residential roads, he says it is probably one of the most amazing cars he has ever driven. He says it outperforms his Gallardo and does it in a way that makes it comfortable and easy to drive around town. Would he ever think of getting rid of his Gallardo for a Vette (ZR1 included)? Hell no! It's all about the experience, prestige, looks, and fun you have in an exotic car.

Exotics are toys. Apples to oranges guys...


C6 Z06 is great in performance BUT interior feels quite "lacking" to me.........
Old 06-03-2008, 04:19 PM
  #132  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
FThornton666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Clarita/Northridge CA
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E350
Originally Posted by Last Emperor
the scud has a way better track time than the zonda
What tracks and what dimension is a Scuderia a faster track car than a Zonda F? For raw performance and driving no car on earth matches the Zonda F, except for the clubsport zonda. RWD, Mid Engine, 6 speed manual, bare carbon fiber color option, and a Naturally aspirated V12.
Old 06-03-2008, 04:21 PM
  #133  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Carl Lassiter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: L.A., CA
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 M5, '10 Land Cruiser
Originally Posted by FThornton666
What tracks and what dimension is a Scuderia a faster track car than a Zonda F? For raw performance and driving no car on earth matches the Zonda F, except for the clubsport zonda. RWD, Mid Engine, 6 speed manual, bare carbon fiber color option, and a Naturally aspirated V12.
I would've thought the Carrera GT can handle one...
Old 06-03-2008, 04:46 PM
  #134  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,729
Received 561 Likes on 371 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by FThornton666
What tracks and what dimension is a Scuderia a faster track car than a Zonda F? For raw performance and driving no car on earth matches the Zonda F, except for the clubsport zonda. RWD, Mid Engine, 6 speed manual, bare carbon fiber color option, and a Naturally aspirated V12.
+1

Kid didn't do his homework, Zonda F decimates all comers, Pagani really did it right and continues to improve on his original, Scud doesn't come anywhere near it.
Old 06-03-2008, 05:34 PM
  #135  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
FThornton666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Clarita/Northridge CA
Posts: 2,992
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E350
Originally Posted by Carl Lassiter
I would've thought the Carrera GT can handle one...
That is true the CGT did own the ring time a few seconds faster than the Zonda, but i dont think the Clubsport has been run there.
Old 06-04-2008, 12:28 AM
  #136  
Super Member
 
Mr.PS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tee_tz
WOOOOW. I'm sorry, I just had to respond to this post after reading that. The F430 is NOTHING compared to an CL65, maybe you drove the F430 but clearly you haven't driven the CL65. You can kill the Ferrari while getting a massage in the cooled seats and playing a track off of your iPod (or music from your 60GB built in hard drive).

Don't get me wrong, Ferrari are good cars; but Ferrari's only sell because we live in a vain world -- Porsche is a REAL sports car. Because the F430 would be put to shame by the GT2.

But the one credit I will give Ferrari is the 575 Maranello. That was a true sports car!! The 360, F430... those are not the greatest Ferrari's, they are more flashy than anything.

That's just my 2cents.


Tee_Tz.
You have just revealed to us that you have obviously never driven an F430 or 360, or any Ferrari for that matter. Comparing a GT2 to an F430 or Cl65 is no comparison. Each car is vastly different from one another. Different in driving feel, utility, comfort, and performance.

Go out and drive all of the cars you just uselessly rambled about and come back with a real drivers opinion.
Old 06-04-2008, 09:13 AM
  #137  
Super Member
 
Glock Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Steel Gray 09' C63 AMG
Old 06-06-2008, 02:57 PM
  #138  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
tee_tz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML63 AMG
Originally Posted by Fr0zen
You have just revealed to us that you have obviously never driven an F430 or 360, or any Ferrari for that matter. Comparing a GT2 to an F430 or Cl65 is no comparison. Each car is vastly different from one another. Different in driving feel, utility, comfort, and performance.

Go out and drive all of the cars you just uselessly rambled about and come back with a real drivers opinion.
Actually I haven't driven the F430; I was just given a thrill ride in it (not the same). However, I have seen this car get beat on the track quite often, even by some modded E55's.

The GT2, to ME, is better in every aspect than an F430; from optional equipment (i.e. Nav, Bose system, etc.) to performance numbers (not just manufacture claims/road test data, but at real track lap times).

So, I'm not claiming to be an expert, but I'm just saying it's hard to argue the facts and in almost every performance factor, the Porsche GT2 has come out ahead. And where the Ferrari wins seems to be price, exclusivity and design (debatable to all). I'm not saying the Ferrari is crap, I'm just saying an F430 is not the best sports car in the world; it's actually Ferrari's lowest product - so Ferrari is capable of much better.

As for the CL65, it isn't in their category - I was commenting because those were the cars being compared. There's a member on here called "Xecution" who had a Ferrari and got the S65 - he said the S65 felt, drove and was much more powerful and faster (funny, in that thread I was arguing for the Ferrari).

Anyway, I guess you own a Ferrari, you seem like you are defending your purchase

Tee_Tz.
Old 06-06-2008, 03:48 PM
  #139  
Member
 
Familycar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG
Furthermore: GT3RSR kicks F430GT booty

Go Flying Lizards!

btw, speed TV looks like the've got Le Mans coverage Sat 6/14 0830-1200ET, 9pET, then again Sun 6/15 0600-0930ET for those of you interested

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Got my C63 today. Holy Sh!!!t



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:11 AM.