C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My dyno results have me happy but confused

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-30-2009, 02:19 PM
  #26  
Member
 
SRTpowa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Shreveport/BAFB
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Srt-6 Crossfire
Nice #'s. Your car might be a factory freak. If you can get ahold of some sunocco 104 or VP MS109, it is oxygented and will add some power even without a tune. They are also unleaded so no worries. The sunocco goes for $6 a gallon if I buy a 55 gallon drum, and will last over a year if you keep it sealed. You can also buy 5 gallon drums for about $40 if you just want to test it out. I pick mine up in TX, you'll have to find a dealer in your area.
Old 03-30-2009, 03:03 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
taylorcoleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Yeah, I got a 389 max hp on the same brand dyno with my Kleemann K2 tune, so your numbers sound very high. What weight did you use in the config?

However, I was not in dyno mode, and I hear that not being in dyno mode can rob up to 60-70 rwhp. Also, I was in manual mode and perhaps I should have been in S mode. I've done all my engine break-in after the tune in S mode, and rarely drive in M mode. So I'll be on the dyno again in a a couple of weeks.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:40 PM
  #28  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by 6.3CAMG
What do you guys think here in saudi we use 95 octan gas but on the cars gas cap it is written that i should use 98 octan do u think i should add octan booster??
Your 95 is our 91, your 98 is our 93.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:41 PM
  #29  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by taylorcoleman
Yeah, I got a 389 max hp on the same brand dyno with my Kleemann K2 tune, so your numbers sound very high. What weight did you use in the config?

However, I was not in dyno mode, and I hear that not being in dyno mode can rob up to 60-70 rwhp. Also, I was in manual mode and perhaps I should have been in S mode. I've done all my engine break-in after the tune in S mode, and rarely drive in M mode. So I'll be on the dyno again in a a couple of weeks.
The most I've ever seen dyno mode gain vs manual is 10rwhp.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:43 PM
  #30  
MHP
Banned
 
MHP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'09 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
Thanks, Andy.

So in other words, if Jeffield wasn't as good looking as he is, his car would have posted even lower numbers! Wow!

Oh, wait a sec, you mean the octane difference. Okay, so if he had put in 94 octane like I did, his numbers would have been closer if not identical to mine. But what would account for the fact that other stock C63s that have dynoed on that machine (at Miller Performance in Abbotsford, BC) also show numbers closer to Jeffield's rather than mine?

Jeffield's car is a few months older than mine, or perhaps I should say that he has more clicks on his odometer than I do on mine. I'm at about 7,200 kilometres right now.

Oh well, I'm not interested in having the most powerful C63 around. I just thought it would be good to get some insight from folks who are more experienced than I am about these things.
Correct, the numbers would have been closer to yours; though I can't say they would've been as high. Every car is different to an extent, maybe you have a Wednesday ride.

Jeffield's numbers sound about right for a C63 on 91 octane on a Mustang Dyno. I wouldn't worry if I was him.
Old 03-30-2009, 06:14 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Originally Posted by SRTpowa
Nice #'s. Your car might be a factory freak. If you can get ahold of some sunocco 104 or VP MS109, it is oxygented and will add some power even without a tune. They are also unleaded so no worries. The sunocco goes for $6 a gallon if I buy a 55 gallon drum, and will last over a year if you keep it sealed. You can also buy 5 gallon drums for about $40 if you just want to test it out. I pick mine up in TX, you'll have to find a dealer in your area.
Originally Posted by MHP
Correct, the numbers would have been closer to yours; though I can't say they would've been as high. Every car is different to an extent, maybe you have a Wednesday ride.

Jeffield's numbers sound about right for a C63 on 91 octane on a Mustang Dyno. I wouldn't worry if I was him.
Thanks, gentlemen!

Gosh, I've got this warm fuzzy feeling inside right now. LOL
Old 03-31-2009, 01:22 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Finally got around to scanning the dyno sheet. Here it is!

402 whp (although the screen readout did say 403.5) on a stock C63.

Old 03-31-2009, 01:55 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Maybe this had something to do with it?

Originally Posted by Jeffield
didnt care

raped the break in rules

and BAM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My dyno results have me happy but confused



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.