C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

Manual shifting on the C63 AMG truly sucks!

Old 08-19-2010, 07:49 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by AlexCim
This is what pisses me off about my 63, it's so all over the place. One day its good, one day its not.

I'll go on a hard drive, and at the end of the drive the car feels so responsive, and tight and everything is the way that I want it. But then I turn it off and the next day its back to granpa spec. I got WOT every single day several times, so I am sure my car is tighter than most, but I want RAW.

I just wish there was a button that just made everything the best it can be. Best throttle response, best gearbox setting, best suspension settings, best ESP setting etc. Not like, pre-set as per my needs, but just everything at 100%.

Unfortunately, the more I live with it, the more I realize that my C63 just doesn't excite me. I know it could, but something is just holding it back....
That's what I've been calling for in the past 5 years. We need an AMG button that would allow the car to output maximum performance. This would include fastest shift times, fastest throttle response, best suspension/differential settings, etc....
Old 08-19-2010, 08:02 PM
  #27  
Member
 
nickia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'10 C63 AMG | '10 Lexus RX350 | '10 E550C |'98 Lexus ES300 (Love this car)
no wonder I used to hit the limiter a lot because I press the pedal at almost redline
Old 08-19-2010, 10:53 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
AlexCim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 Ultima GTR
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
There's one small problem with that hypothesis, Alex. Even if you pressed all those buttons, it doesn't mean the car will feel the same way every time you use it. Imagine if you had no buttons to change any settings on your car (and in fact, most cars are like that), you could drive the car on separate occasions, separated by mere hours, and the car could feel completely different simply owing to how hot the engine is, what altitude you're driving at, whether the brakes have begun to show signs of fade, or even because of how much fuel is left in the tank.

There are so many factors that affect a car's performance (or the way it feels) at any given moment in time that it's next to impossible to expect it to always be consistent in giving its driver the same feeling it did the last time he/she drove it, even if you pushed all the right buttons.

Probably better just to learn to live with it.
I completely understand the concept of a car being different every time. I know air temp/pressure, humidity etc all play a role, BUT, i'm happy to accept differences in performance based on natural factors.

I am not happy to accept performance differences based on electronics "thinking" they know better than me. I mean, adaptive gearbox settings? WHY? Just because I drive like a ***** for a week, doesn't mean I want a laggy *** gearbox when I pull up next to that special something and want to give it a squirt. I think adjustable things should be like suspension. Super soft, soft, medium, hard, rock hard. Not "S" which can mean that depending on your driving over a week, it goes anywhere between soft and rock hard...

Look, I am living with it, don't misunderstand me, I am keeping the car, it's just sad that this car could be SO much more fun. Like sure, its comfy, its fast, but it just doesn't wow me....and it definitely could! I have more fun driving a 70's Ford Escort with a 5 speed on the floor and a 2L turbo motor. At least in that I know that the car is always putting in 100%.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:11 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
If you want a crisp paddle shifting car, buy a true manual dual clutch like those that come in the GTR or the 997TT PDK if you have the money.

Mercedes makes the best automatic transmission around, buying one and expecting good performance in manual mode is simply foolish.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:39 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
FBTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63
I have to say my ISF shifted way better than my C63. BTW, has anyone driven the 2010 E63 with the MCT? how does that shift??
Old 08-20-2010, 02:22 AM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
bli8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 Seal Gray
I have the same issue with the Tiptronic transmission of my Porsche Turbo (the same 5 speed auto transmission as in the SL), most of the time it shifts lazy and would only hold the gear when I'm hammering the car. The C63 is similar to the Turbo's but actually still shifts more aggressive than the Turbo. These transmission are too smart for their own good. I had an Mitsu EvO X that had just three very simple and non adaptive shift modes - normal, sport, and sport+ which I found to be all the intelligence I need. Sport is perfect for spirited driving while sport+ would not go below 4500 RPM in any gear (track only).
In the Porsche world there are tuners out there that would charge $1000 to reprogram the TCU but I just can't justify spending that much dough. Now I do have an idea, what if someone can simply disable the less aggressive shift logic maps in S??? Let's say the TCU has 10 maps in S, just give me the more aggressive 3 or 4 maps and I'll be happy. So is anyone out there that can do this for say $500?
Old 08-20-2010, 10:19 AM
  #32  
Member
 
jafores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Philippines
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
08 C63, 07 ML63, 92 500E, 70 300SEL 6.3, 63 220 SEB Conv. Sold 02 G500, 97 E50,92 C280,71 280SE 4.5
I drove a SL63 yesterday and Man I would give almost anything to have this tranny put in my C63

Shifts feel more sure footed and faster but its not as jolting as the M5's
Old 08-20-2010, 01:53 PM
  #33  
Member
 
Exacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
E46 M3, '09 C63
Originally Posted by bli8
I have the same issue with the Tiptronic transmission of my Porsche Turbo (the same 5 speed auto transmission as in the SL), most of the time it shifts lazy and would only hold the gear when I'm hammering the car. The C63 is similar to the Turbo's but actually still shifts more aggressive than the Turbo. These transmission are too smart for their own good. I had an Mitsu EvO X that had just three very simple and non adaptive shift modes - normal, sport, and sport+ which I found to be all the intelligence I need. Sport is perfect for spirited driving while sport+ would not go below 4500 RPM in any gear (track only).
In the Porsche world there are tuners out there that would charge $1000 to reprogram the TCU but I just can't justify spending that much dough. Now I do have an idea, what if someone can simply disable the less aggressive shift logic maps in S??? Let's say the TCU has 10 maps in S, just give me the more aggressive 3 or 4 maps and I'll be happy. So is anyone out there that can do this for say $500?

The eve x is a true double clutch system though, so it's not comparable to the auto tranny of the C63, but yeah I can't see why they can't just make an auto tranny operate the same way.
Old 08-20-2010, 03:33 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MB_Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: California, USA
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by SebringSilver
There's one small problem with that hypothesis, Alex. Even if you pressed all those buttons, it doesn't mean the car will feel the same way every time you use it. Imagine if you had no buttons to change any settings on your car (and in fact, most cars are like that), you could drive the car on separate occasions, separated by mere hours, and the car could feel completely different simply owing to how hot the engine is, what altitude you're driving at, whether the brakes have begun to show signs of fade, or even because of how much fuel is left in the tank.

There are so many factors that affect a car's performance (or the way it feels) at any given moment in time that it's next to impossible to expect it to always be consistent in giving its driver the same feeling it did the last time he/she drove it, even if you pushed all the right buttons.

Probably better just to learn to live with it.
We're not saying get rid of the adaptations and automatic adjustments the car is trying to make. In fact, most people actually love the adaptations especially in comfort mode or in more relaxed driving conditions. However, all we are asking for is a button that would temporarily provide settings for maximum performance. And when that button is not selected, everything goes back to normal. It's like having the best of both worlds.

Last edited by MB_Forever; 08-20-2010 at 07:48 PM.
Old 08-20-2010, 06:38 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Originally Posted by AlexCim
I completely understand the concept of a car being different every time. I know air temp/pressure, humidity etc all play a role, BUT, i'm happy to accept differences in performance based on natural factors.

I am not happy to accept performance differences based on electronics "thinking" they know better than me. I mean, adaptive gearbox settings? WHY? Just because I drive like a ***** for a week, doesn't mean I want a laggy *** gearbox when I pull up next to that special something and want to give it a squirt. I think adjustable things should be like suspension. Super soft, soft, medium, hard, rock hard. Not "S" which can mean that depending on your driving over a week, it goes anywhere between soft and rock hard...

Look, I am living with it, don't misunderstand me, I am keeping the car, it's just sad that this car could be SO much more fun. Like sure, its comfy, its fast, but it just doesn't wow me....and it definitely could! I have more fun driving a 70's Ford Escort with a 5 speed on the floor and a 2L turbo motor. At least in that I know that the car is always putting in 100%.
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
We're not saying get rid of the adaptations and automatic adjustments the car is trying to make. In fact, most people actually love the adaptations especially in comfort mode or in more relaxed driving environments. However, all we are asking for is for a button that would temporarily provide settings for maximum performance. And when that button is not selected, everything goes back to normal. It's like having the best of both worlds.
I hear ya.
Old 08-21-2010, 02:00 PM
  #36  
Super Member
 
NickZag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no more AMG
I hate how everyone gripes about this. It's an automatic with a torque converter, not a manual with dual clutches and yet it's still faster a lot of them. I've never had any problems with the speed of the shifts on the tracks I've gone to, and to be honest the only time I even use M is to put down rubber or listen to the exhaust note. There are only a very small handful of people that are going to get a faster lap time switching they're car from Sport to Manual and believe me, even with the decent amount of track experience that I have, I'm not one of those people.
Old 08-21-2010, 07:37 PM
  #37  
Member
 
DutchC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 AMG 2009
i was on the fence for a long time before choosing the C63 over the new M3 and drove them back to back several times. coming from an 02 M3 6sp manual i had my reservations but i dont regret the move. the MB transmission is not perfect. the smarts that are included in this transmission which supposedly adapts to and learns your driving habits, well , not sure how this works because call me multi personality but i have moments i get in the car and want to relax and put it C and suddenly my MAD personality kicks in and i put it in S and a floor it and it is rather lazy to shift down and other moments it holds its gears long . no computer can try to follow my brain so indeed the only solution is buttons. so i stop the car , put it in M, turn off the the ESP and let me tell you, in my car with the Eurocharge tune it shifts very fast, not as fast as the DSC's of the world but pretty darn close, the only part that i dont understand is that it only shifts very fast while accelerating or down shifting, as soon I you decide that I am not in a rush anymore , despite the M mode, the shifting continues at a slower pace. this latter unintended move from Jekyl crazy by choice fast to Hyde lazy again i could definitely do away with. when i choose M it needs to shift fast, no matter my driving style slow or fast.
my 2C
Old 09-03-2010, 12:29 AM
  #38  
Junior Member
 
bli8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63 Seal Gray
Originally Posted by Exacc
The eve x is a true double clutch system though, so it's not comparable to the auto tranny of the C63, but yeah I can't see why they can't just make an auto tranny operate the same way.
Exactly, I wanted the shift logic of the EVO X to be in our C63. And it's okay to me if the C shifts slower than the EVO X's twin clutch, and in exchange the transition from D to R and roll out is still smoother and faster (yes sometimes I had to wait a second or two before the car would go into reverse in the EVO) with the C's torque converter auto trans.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Manual shifting on the C63 AMG truly sucks!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM.