C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63 ECU Tuning!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 05:43 PM
  #76  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by otoupalik
Mo,

You are making some large assumptions. I would put our C63 up against any other C63. Just because someone does not go to the drag strip does not mean the car is not fast. Let's be realistic, like .01% of AMG owners want to or would be bothered to go to the drag strip - and you know this.
Brad, I was only stating observations based on what we have witnessed at the track to date. Josh was indeed new to drag racing but so was Keith, mthis, and others who were running M.H.P parts. Also, Phil was at the same Famoso event (he is a relatively experienced driver) yet was only running ETs between 12.4 to 12.7 all day long (by the way, he only had the Powerchip tune)

Originally Posted by otoupalik
You cannot make a statement like you are without making some huge assumptions and leaps in logic, and to be honest, I am surprised that you are doing that as it is out of our character. To state that a car with *** headers and tune would walk from another tuner is just a HUGE assumption not based on real facts.
Again, I was only gathering information based on what we have seen at the track so far. I assume Powerchip has sold far more tunes than M.H.P due to lower price point, yet not one single Powerchip-tuned car had posted success at the track while the very few M.H.P. cars seem to continue to push extremely hard. Personally, I would've thought that the very few AMG owners who do go through all the trouble of modding their cars to extract so much more power out of them to, at the very least, take it to the track even just once. Moreover, the M.H.P. car was driven by Andy himself and was witnessed by other respected members on the boards and nobody questioned his runs, mods, setup, etc.... nor did they question Keith's runs or mthis runs Anyways, regardless of the current data set, we have another Famoso event coming up soon, and maybe the outcome will be different. In fact, I'm sure it will be, as I really do believe Josh will break into the 11s

Originally Posted by otoupalik
So some x63's are fast from other tuners - that is not a surprise. Shops like ours, Renntech and Kleemann have been in business for a long time for a reason. No tuner has ALL the fastest cars, that is just reality.
I wasn't even talking about quickest/fastest cars, I was only referring to tune only or tune + headers.

Originally Posted by otoupalik
As to JRCart's car, he has BOLT ON MODS - there is nothing custom on the car. Yes, it has a dyno tune, but so do some other 63's out there. It has light wheels, but so do others, etc. Is his car "tuned" - YES. It has a well balanced list of modifications that work together to successfully reach the goal.
I'm not sure any of the other 63s were custom dyno tuned let alone as much as Jrcart's. Also, his wheels are not just light, they were the lightest and best wheels on the market at the time. But I'm not even comparing the CLK63 black to the C63. I was trying to compare similarly modded C63s.

The Evosport headers look great and I'm very surprised the RennTech ones look like they do

Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 29, 2009 at 07:55 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #77  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by jrcart
...at the end of the day and the end of all of my R & D I have concluded that the evosprort/PC tune and mods worked best in my car. Anyone with half a brain should be able to conclude the same since none of you ... have touched any of my times at the strip. The proof is in the pudding...evosport knows these 63 motors better than any tuner out there, nobody else if even very close at this point.
Originally Posted by jrcart
Trust me, my times are much quicker than what is posted on Juicees list ... I am trapping close to 128 N/A and over 134 on the bottle
Originally Posted by jrcart
...To acheive the 11.22 in June I raised the car up about .400" dialed in less compression and slowed the rebound, this translated to a 1.55 60ft time .05 quicker than my previous best 60ft.
Originally Posted by jrcart
... I'm not too up to speed on C63 stuff, but what I do know is the CLK 63 BS and C63 have the same powerplant and a nearly identicle computer so if the *** stuff is that much better somebody should be knockin on my N/A times but they are nearly .250 seconds off the pace
Originally Posted by jrcart
Mo, like I said before, I don't know enough about the C63's or their recent performance benchmarks to comment on this, I believe what you are saying, you are a straight shooter. The only question I pose is why is my evo/PC tuned car so much quicker? The cars are within a couple hundred pounds, the C63 has a chassis and suspension better suited for drag racing (longer wheel base and softer suspension), and the C has a better drag coefficient. Based on what you are saying and on paper these *** C63's should be quicker but they are nearly a quarter second off the pace which, as we all know is night and day when talking about 11 second cars.
Originally Posted by otoupalik
Mo,

You are making some large assumptions. I would put our C63 up against any other C63. Just because someone does not go to the drag strip does not mean the car is not fast. Let's be realistic, like .01% of AMG owners want to or would be bothered to go to the drag strip - and you know this.
My two-cents'-worth:

Leaving all other tuners out of it for the moment, the closest apples-to-apples comparison is reviewing the best (N/A) of both the full bolt-ons evo/PC CLK63BS vs. the full bolt-ons evo/PC C63. Now, we all know that jrcart's Black Series has experienced awesome amounts of testing and R&D - but so has C63 Guy's C63, which easily has $20k+ worth of performance-enhancing hardware and software from evo/PC.

To-date, for whatever reasons, that has not translated performance-wise very positively for the C63:

Vehicle: evo/PC CLK63BS......evo/PC C63
60'................1.5x................1.8x
1/4 ET...........11.2x...............12.1x
1/4 Trap........127.x...............117.x

Now, if you want to compare the evo/PC C63 to other C63s (i.e. staying with the same platform), the 60' time isn't too bad... undoubtedly assisted by those meaty rear tires, but I think anyone "in-the-know" on these vehicles would be hard-pressed to claim the ET and Trap as anything other than a bit disappointing for the given level of modifications to a vehicle allegedly making around 600 brake horsepower.

Above, jrcart makes the large assumption that because evo/PC has helped him achieve admirable, remarkable performance in his Black Series, that "no other tuner is even close" for tuning all variants of 63 AMGs. The data doesn't seem to support that assertion. To me, the question is not "if XYZ's C63 tuning is so good, why are they .250 off my best CLK63BS (N/A) ET?" - the question is "why is the evo/PC CLK63BS roughly a SECOND quicker and TEN MPH faster than the comparable evo/PC C63?"

Last edited by c32AMG-DTM; Dec 29, 2009 at 06:34 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #78  
otoupalik's Avatar
MBWorld Founder
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 7
From: Scottsdale (aka The Surface of the Sun)
Again, you HAVE to standardize drivers, experience and tires in order for it to be a fair comaprison, if you don't you are fooling yourself and those that read it.

Your "DATA" is only a small sample of those that 1/4 mile race their cars. How many AMG owners do you think that is? My guess is .01% if that many.

As to compare the C and CLK with our mods, the answer lies in the variables - tires, driver, experience.

pure street tires v. drag slicks
very experienced driver v. first time

Anyone that thinks this is not a real difference is crazy!

Thanks
Brad

BTW - a 63 is a 63. Anyone that thinks that performance of one 63 chasiss does not translate to another is again fooling themselves. They are the same motors with minor differences in stock form, but modified they are all essentially the same.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #79  
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by otoupalik
Again, you HAVE to standardize drivers, experience and tires in order for it to be a fair comaprison, if you don't you are fooling yourself and those that read it.

Your "DATA" is only a small sample of those that 1/4 mile race their cars. How many AMG owners do you think that is? My guess is .01% if that many.

As to compare the C and CLK with our mods, the answer lies in the variables - tires, driver, experience.

pure street tires v. drag slicks
very experienced driver v. first time

Anyone that thinks this is not a real difference is crazy!

Thanks
Brad
Brad,

Why is "data" in quotes? Are you stating that it's somehow not "data"? And why are you calling it mine?

I agree that drivers, experience (although, those are kind of the same thing), and tires can make a difference - as can differing tracks, weather conditions, etc. That said... driver/experience seems to make the biggest difference in 60' and ET; I've not seen a driver make a huge difference in observed trap speeds (esp. for an auto-tranny vehicle), and sticky drag slicks tend to actually lower trap speeds vs. street tires - in my limited experience.

10 MPH in the 1/4 mile trap speed is a monumental difference in performance for 63 AMGs modded to comparable levels... JMHO, others may disagree.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:33 PM
  #80  
hhughes1's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 3
From: Central Florida
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
This is getting worse than the party lines in Congress

I for one am glad that we have a few choices and I have no problem running a Kleemann tune, *** pipes and probably some Evosport rotors in the not to distant future. While I am partial to the *** products and happen to like Andy as a person, that does not mean I have to harbor ill will to any other vendors or members using their products.

I did not think Mo's comments were "out of character" at all. He is always a voice of reason within our sometimes insane conversations and he was merely attesting to what is documented. I also believe that anyone going to the expense of putting long tubes on their car is going to make a pass or two and right now the results are somewhat biased. Moving forward, I can't wait to see the next generation of enhancements and with my daughter's wedding just a few weeks away, maybe I will be able to afford modding once again.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #81  
otoupalik's Avatar
MBWorld Founder
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 7
From: Scottsdale (aka The Surface of the Sun)
LOL - congrats on the wedding! My son is only 5 and I am already ready for him to support himself! =)

Thanks
brad
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #82  
otoupalik's Avatar
MBWorld Founder
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 7
From: Scottsdale (aka The Surface of the Sun)
I believe that JRCart has offered to do just that MANY times. I don't bet money on racing or anything else. If you see post #81, I have a 5 year old, and with his birth my gambling days ended. =)
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #83  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by otoupalik
LOL - congrats on the wedding! My son is only 5 and I am already ready for him to support himself! =)

Thanks
brad
Is he ready to drive yet? I almost had him drive my E63 last January for some serious weight reduction He would've probably destroyed all our records in our own cars
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #84  
otoupalik's Avatar
MBWorld Founder
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 7
From: Scottsdale (aka The Surface of the Sun)
He has been driving the golf cart and sitting in my lap since 2. 3 months ago, he drove our x5 steering wheel and pedals for the first time! Time for a kart!

He likes to go fast, but he also likes "crashing" - so he is not ready for a SOLO yet! lol

BTW - this dialog does not have to get contintious! Many of us are able to disagree and discuss without losing respect or calling each other names! I wish that everyone would be like this on the site, oh well!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #85  
nielsll's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 106
Likes: 1
From: Green Oaks, La Quinta
76 220D
These "which ECU tune is best" pissing matches are really counterproductive. I suggest that we pool resources and commission the development of an intake /fuel management system that can produce significant gains. I suggest a Kinsler manifold / injection setup ala the C6R unit and a dedicated engine management system from Pi Research or MOTEC. Gains over the best ECU reflash should approximate a well tuned carbureted engine or about 5HP/L and retain all the benefits of EFI.

Any takers?
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #86  
brad @ evosport's Avatar
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
None fast enough!
Keith,

Yes, happy to race anytime, I already posted that Josh is up for it anytime (the last line in post #73).

Again, as Simon posted, I had nothing to do with the decision that was made today regarding the other vendor. It was done without my involvement.

Thanks
Brad
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #87  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by otoupalik
He has been driving the golf cart and sitting in my lap since 2. 3 months ago, he drove our x5 steering wheel and pedals for the first time! Time for a kart!

He likes to go fast, but he also likes "crashing" - so he is not ready for a SOLO yet! lol
LOL.... he would still do better than my friend who almost hit the wall at Famoso I would like to see you guys again whenever there's a chance.... maybe next year

Originally Posted by otoupalik
BTW - this dialog does not have to get contintious! Many of us are able to disagree and discuss without losing respect or calling each other names! I wish that everyone would be like this on the site, oh well!
I agree with you on this 100%..... I personally don't lose respect for someone because I disagree with him or her regardless of the topic. And I don't lose my temper easily either despite the too many hostile arguments that's been taking place on the boards lately, so I understand exactly what you are trying to say. I really respect you for that comment and hope I did not lose your respect either I am always up for a healthy discussion

Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 29, 2009 at 08:31 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #88  
brad @ evosport's Avatar
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
None fast enough!
Originally Posted by nielsll
These "which ECU tune is best" pissing matches are really counterproductive. I suggest that we pool resources and commission the development of an intake /fuel management system that can produce significant gains. I suggest a Kinsler manifold / injection setup ala the C6R unit and a dedicated engine management from Pi Research or MOTEC. Gains over the best ECU reflash should approximate a well tuned carbureted engine or about 5HP/L and retain all the benefits of EFI.

Any takers?
Hey Lou! As we spoke about, I am working this now! =)

Originally Posted by MB_Forever
I agree with you on this 100%..... I personally don't lose respect for someone because I disagree with him or her regardless of the situation. And I don't lose my temper easily either, so I understand exactly what you are trying to say. I really respect you for that comment and hope I did not lose your respect either I am always up for a healthy discussion
Back at ya! Far too many take things here WAY too far!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #89  
brad @ evosport's Avatar
PREMIER SPONSOR
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,922
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach, CA
None fast enough!
I am always down for fun competition. We should arrange a tuner shoot out with a magazine - dyno, road track and 1/4 mile (like the EuroTuner shoot out we have done many times). That will give more even results!

A more even race would be a car with the same mods v. another with the same mods, but oh well - it is always fun to run and see what people are doing!

Thanks
Brad
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:43 PM
  #90  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by Dads C63
Brad,
Its NOT my car he's talking about. Its Andy's C63. I'll let him know Josh is ready. I might have to fly to where ever this takes place just to watch. Should be a good race.
We have a Famoso event coming up on January 9th.... DA will be between 0 and 200 ft with high temps of 58 F. I would like this race to go down without any money involved.... a race for just the title in order to keep things more friendly.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:47 PM
  #91  
Dads C63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 14
From: Central Florida
2014 Audi RS7
Brad,
I would be glad to run an Evosport C63 for fun. Lets set up a track rental soon and meet and race.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 09:05 PM
  #92  
Dads C63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 14
From: Central Florida
2014 Audi RS7
Thank you for the invite. However, I have a managers meeting that week so I can't make that weekend. However, I am sure we can make it another time.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #93  
RNS-11Z's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 101
From: Australia
09 C63
What happened to the term "fun" in all of this. All tunes are within minimal hp of each other. So 1 car is .2 tenths quicker, wow. Do you build your car for other peoples applauses or for you own enjoyment? i think thats were the line is crossed. I love my c63, and i find it appreciating to see faster c63's then mine, as it gives me encouragement and to know that those times are possible.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #94  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by MB_Forever
The only answer to that question that I can think of is that your car is much more heavily modded than the other C63s.... and not only heavily modded, it's modded correctly. The amount of research and development you and Evosport put into your car is probably one of the most extensive for the 63 series.

Jim..... so will you ever go forced induction? Common, spill the beans

Mo, BINGO! you hit the nail on the head and reitterated the point I have been trying to make on this thread all along...R&D and experience, no tuner that I am aware of has as much actual engineering R&D on a 63 than evosport and those results are clear when looking at my dyno numbers, 1/4 mile times and lap times on road courses.

Mo, you know I track my BS as much or more than just about anyone on MB World, I'm not affraid to haul my car from coast to coast and beat the snot out of it. I have run at multiple MB events which have been organized by various people right here on MB World. I've run the BS at more than 10 drag strips and a half dozen different road courses and never once has ANY 63 come close to my times, on many occasions I had the quickest over MB at an event, in fact I believe I had the quickest MB at the event you put together at Famoso last January, If my memory serves me correctly the only car to outgun me that day was a heavily modded AWD Turbo P Car.

All I am saying is if MHP stuff is so far superior why don't they have the numbers and records to back it up? Talk is cheap, you have seen me set and break records with your own two eyes. People can choose who they want as a tuner, but if I was new to the 63 game I would go with the highest performing and most proven product available and at this point in time that is evosport products. If and when something better comes along you will probably see it on my car, but until then it's evosport all the way.

As for forced induction, no, already looked into it nearly two years ago, it is not a good option for this motor. I already told you what is next for my motor, it's gonna be another game changer.

Last edited by jrcart; Dec 30, 2009 at 01:36 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #95  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by Dads C63
Brad/Evosport,
You gonna race a M H P car for $10,000?? I heard there is a challenge on the table. YIKES!!
I'll run you for bragging rights, but I think large cash wagers tend to make things a little more exciting for everyone, don't you? I invited you to a private track day in Houston in late February but you had some lame excuse about wanting to run "at a fast track like Atco". That just goes to show you how little you know about drag racing because HRP in Feb is about as fast as you are going to find in North America, track elevation of 38ft and negative DA is almost a given...furthermore, the track location should not matter since it will be a head-to-head race both cars subjected to the same conditions, I'll even give you lane choice in a best of three or single race, you decide.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #96  
alqamzi's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: denver,CO
2009 c63, 2011 GT500
Exclamation

Originally Posted by jrcart
I'll run you for bragging rights, but I think large cash wagers tend to make things a little more exciting for everyone, don't you? I invited you to a private track day in Houston in late February but you had some lame excuse about wanting to run "at a fast track like Atco". That just goes to show you how little you know about drag racing because HRP in Feb is about as fast as you are going to find in North America, track elevation of 38ft and negative DA is almost a given...furthermore, the track location should not matter since it will be a head-to-head race both cars subjected to the same conditions, I'll even give you lane choice in a best of three or single race, you decide.
am sorry in advance for what i will say i've been reading alot of your posts you think that u r god and u have the fastest 63 i am willing to rACE u in feb any place u want say it and i will be there am new in this website and from the posts i read dadsc63 is the man and all of us know...i want to race you but without NOS and shall we see who wons.as i said am sorry in advance...
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #97  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by alqamzi
am sorry in advance for what i will say i've been reading alot of your posts you think that u r god and u have the fastest 63 i am willing to rACE u in feb any place u want say it and i will be there am new in this website and from the posts i read dadsc63 is the man and all of us know...i want to race you but without NOS and shall we see who wons.as i said am sorry in advance...
...Name your price big man, you are attempting to call out the wrong person. Just to be straight, you are talking about running your C63 against my CLK Black Series, neither of us are allowed to run nitrous, right? I'll personally let you disconnect the bottle and solenoids if you wish, I don't need any claims or accusations that I cheated after I beat you. LOL, I don't even know what mods you have, nor do I care, I am that confident.

BTW, Houston last weekend in Feb.

Last edited by jrcart; Dec 30, 2009 at 01:32 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #98  
chief63's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 690
Likes: 1
From: Montreal, Canada
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
Originally Posted by RNS-11Z
What happened to the term "fun" in all of this. All tunes are within minimal hp of each other. So 1 car is .2 tenths quicker, wow. Do you build your car for other peoples applauses or for you own enjoyment? i think thats were the line is crossed. I love my c63, and i find it appreciating to see faster c63's then mine, as it gives me encouragement and to know that those times are possible.
I totally agree with you. Anyways drag racing is still a little bit dull and it would be much more fun to see all you guys on a track somewhere race it out (with a camera in each car). This way we can see who has the best driver/car combo. Building a powerful car only requires money, not skill, unless you do everything in house =) A track will seperate the boys from the men!

Just my 2¢
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #99  
Dads C63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,177
Likes: 14
From: Central Florida
2014 Audi RS7
Jim,
FWIW - I do know drag racing and have been at it a long time. Don't appreciate the condescending comment which seems to be your normal mode of operation for some reason. However, my comment about MIR and ATCO is because they can have -1500 to -2000 DA and we both know that equates to record times. All I was saying is if I am going to travel that far lets set some records, not run similar times to what we already have. The last time I ran here was two weeks ago and the DA was -200 so we had great weather for Florida. I am sure we will meet sometime and you may beat me but at least I'll give it a run. Larger, heavier, C63 against a Phenom CLK63 Black Series. I always say, if you are going down, go down against the best.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #100  
MB_Forever's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,137
Likes: 4
From: California, USA
E63 P30, CL500 Sport
Originally Posted by jrcart
All I am saying is if MHP stuff is so far superior why don't they have the numbers and records to back it up? Talk is cheap, you have seen me set and break records with your own two eyes. People can choose who they want as a tuner, but if I was new to the 63 game I would go with the highest performing and most proven product available and at this point in time that is evosport products.
Jim, what I'm trying to say is that the MHP stuff is indeed showing the better numbers and records on the track for the C63 (at least for now). And they have shown those record numbers not only one car as in the case with your car, but they actually showed it on several different customers' cars throughout different parts of the country who in turn showed an immense success with track numbers, dyno numbers, 60 to 130 numbers, high speed runs, texas mile, countless videos, etc....

Once MHP does get a Black Series customer who is willing to dedicate the time and money you did to transform his/her car, I predict they will overtake your records as well (given the driver is at least as skilled/dedicated or should I say addicted as you ).

Off topic fun: that twin-turbo Porsche that ran 10.8x @ 136 mph last January at Famoso was only pushing 570 whp (no nos)..... guess what he is putting down now? He is putting down close to 1100 whp and did the mile at 221 mph. I predict, he'll trap at least 150 mph next time out. And he's supposedly not done. I think the tuner is aiming for 1400 whp! It will be very interesting event at Famoso on the 9th.... come on over and have some fun

Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 30, 2009 at 03:26 PM.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE