C63 ECU Tuning!?
You are making some large assumptions. I would put our C63 up against any other C63. Just because someone does not go to the drag strip does not mean the car is not fast. Let's be realistic, like .01% of AMG owners want to or would be bothered to go to the drag strip - and you know this.
(by the way, he only had the Powerchip tune)
Anyways, regardless of the current data set, we have another Famoso event coming up soon, and maybe the outcome will be different. In fact, I'm sure it will be, as I really do believe Josh will break into the 11s The Evosport headers look great
and I'm very surprised the RennTech ones look like they do
Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 29, 2009 at 07:55 PM.
You are making some large assumptions. I would put our C63 up against any other C63. Just because someone does not go to the drag strip does not mean the car is not fast. Let's be realistic, like .01% of AMG owners want to or would be bothered to go to the drag strip - and you know this.
Leaving all other tuners out of it for the moment, the closest apples-to-apples comparison is reviewing the best (N/A) of both the full bolt-ons evo/PC CLK63BS vs. the full bolt-ons evo/PC C63. Now, we all know that jrcart's Black Series has experienced awesome amounts of testing and R&D - but so has C63 Guy's C63, which easily has $20k+ worth of performance-enhancing hardware and software from evo/PC.
To-date, for whatever reasons, that has not translated performance-wise very positively for the C63:
Vehicle: evo/PC CLK63BS......evo/PC C63
60'................1.5x................1.8x
1/4 ET...........11.2x...............12.1x
1/4 Trap........127.x...............117.x
Now, if you want to compare the evo/PC C63 to other C63s (i.e. staying with the same platform), the 60' time isn't too bad... undoubtedly assisted by those meaty rear tires, but I think anyone "in-the-know" on these vehicles would be hard-pressed to claim the ET and Trap as anything other than a bit disappointing for the given level of modifications to a vehicle allegedly making around 600 brake horsepower.
Above, jrcart makes the large assumption that because evo/PC has helped him achieve admirable, remarkable performance in his Black Series, that "no other tuner is even close" for tuning all variants of 63 AMGs. The data doesn't seem to support that assertion. To me, the question is not "if XYZ's C63 tuning is so good, why are they .250 off my best CLK63BS (N/A) ET?" - the question is "why is the evo/PC CLK63BS roughly a SECOND quicker and TEN MPH faster than the comparable evo/PC C63?"
Last edited by c32AMG-DTM; Dec 29, 2009 at 06:34 PM.

Your "DATA" is only a small sample of those that 1/4 mile race their cars. How many AMG owners do you think that is? My guess is .01% if that many.
As to compare the C and CLK with our mods, the answer lies in the variables - tires, driver, experience.
pure street tires v. drag slicks
very experienced driver v. first time
Anyone that thinks this is not a real difference is crazy!
Thanks
Brad
BTW - a 63 is a 63. Anyone that thinks that performance of one 63 chasiss does not translate to another is again fooling themselves. They are the same motors with minor differences in stock form, but modified they are all essentially the same.
Your "DATA" is only a small sample of those that 1/4 mile race their cars. How many AMG owners do you think that is? My guess is .01% if that many.
As to compare the C and CLK with our mods, the answer lies in the variables - tires, driver, experience.
pure street tires v. drag slicks
very experienced driver v. first time
Anyone that thinks this is not a real difference is crazy!
Thanks
Brad
Why is "data" in quotes? Are you stating that it's somehow not "data"? And why are you calling it mine?
I agree that drivers, experience (although, those are kind of the same thing), and tires can make a difference - as can differing tracks, weather conditions, etc. That said... driver/experience seems to make the biggest difference in 60' and ET; I've not seen a driver make a huge difference in observed trap speeds (esp. for an auto-tranny vehicle), and sticky drag slicks tend to actually lower trap speeds vs. street tires - in my limited experience.
10 MPH in the 1/4 mile trap speed is a monumental difference in performance for 63 AMGs modded to comparable levels... JMHO, others may disagree.

I for one am glad that we have a few choices and I have no problem running a Kleemann tune, *** pipes and probably some Evosport rotors in the not to distant future. While I am partial to the *** products and happen to like Andy as a person, that does not mean I have to harbor ill will to any other vendors or members using their products.
I did not think Mo's comments were "out of character" at all. He is always a voice of reason within our sometimes insane conversations and he was merely attesting to what is documented. I also believe that anyone going to the expense of putting long tubes on their car is going to make a pass or two and right now the results are somewhat biased. Moving forward, I can't wait to see the next generation of enhancements and with my daughter's wedding just a few weeks away, maybe I will be able to afford modding once again.

He would've probably destroyed all our records in our own cars
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

He likes to go fast, but he also likes "crashing" - so he is not ready for a SOLO yet! lol
BTW - this dialog does not have to get contintious! Many of us are able to disagree and discuss without losing respect or calling each other names! I wish that everyone would be like this on the site, oh well!
Any takers?
Yes, happy to race anytime, I already posted that Josh is up for it anytime (the last line in post #73).
Again, as Simon posted, I had nothing to do with the decision that was made today regarding the other vendor. It was done without my involvement.
Thanks
Brad
I would like to see you guys again whenever there's a chance.... maybe next year
Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 29, 2009 at 08:31 PM.
Any takers?

A more even race would be a car with the same mods v. another with the same mods, but oh well - it is always fun to run and see what people are doing!
Thanks
Brad
Jim..... so will you ever go forced induction?
Common, spill the beans 
Mo, BINGO! you hit the nail on the head and reitterated the point I have been trying to make on this thread all along...R&D and experience, no tuner that I am aware of has as much actual engineering R&D on a 63 than evosport and those results are clear when looking at my dyno numbers, 1/4 mile times and lap times on road courses.
Mo, you know I track my BS as much or more than just about anyone on MB World, I'm not affraid to haul my car from coast to coast and beat the snot out of it. I have run at multiple MB events which have been organized by various people right here on MB World. I've run the BS at more than 10 drag strips and a half dozen different road courses and never once has ANY 63 come close to my times, on many occasions I had the quickest over MB at an event, in fact I believe I had the quickest MB at the event you put together at Famoso last January, If my memory serves me correctly the only car to outgun me that day was a heavily modded AWD Turbo P Car.
All I am saying is if MHP stuff is so far superior why don't they have the numbers and records to back it up? Talk is cheap, you have seen me set and break records with your own two eyes. People can choose who they want as a tuner, but if I was new to the 63 game I would go with the highest performing and most proven product available and at this point in time that is evosport products. If and when something better comes along you will probably see it on my car, but until then it's evosport all the way.
As for forced induction, no, already looked into it nearly two years ago, it is not a good option for this motor. I already told you what is next for my motor, it's gonna be another game changer.
Last edited by jrcart; Dec 30, 2009 at 01:36 PM.
BTW, Houston last weekend in Feb.
Last edited by jrcart; Dec 30, 2009 at 01:32 PM.
Just my 2¢
FWIW - I do know drag racing and have been at it a long time. Don't appreciate the condescending comment which seems to be your normal mode of operation for some reason. However, my comment about MIR and ATCO is because they can have -1500 to -2000 DA and we both know that equates to record times. All I was saying is if I am going to travel that far lets set some records, not run similar times to what we already have. The last time I ran here was two weeks ago and the DA was -200 so we had great weather for Florida. I am sure we will meet sometime and you may beat me but at least I'll give it a run. Larger, heavier, C63 against a Phenom CLK63 Black Series. I always say, if you are going down, go down against the best.
Once MHP does get a Black Series customer who is willing to dedicate the time and money you did to transform his/her car, I predict they will overtake your records as well (given the driver is at least as skilled/dedicated or should I say addicted as you
).Off topic fun: that twin-turbo Porsche that ran 10.8x @ 136 mph last January at Famoso was only pushing 570 whp (no nos)..... guess what he is putting down now? He is putting down close to 1100 whp
and did the mile at 221 mph. I predict, he'll trap at least 150 mph next time out. And he's supposedly not done. I think the tuner is aiming for 1400 whp! It will be very interesting event at Famoso on the 9th.... come on over and have some fun
Last edited by MB_Forever; Dec 30, 2009 at 03:26 PM.



