C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Show me some wheels

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-02-2010, 09:43 PM
  #51  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
obsidian05e55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Livingston NJ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63, Grigio Medio E46 M3
I'm assuming your running 245/35, and 275/30? Any rubbing issue front, or back?
Old 03-02-2010, 09:50 PM
  #52  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by callmiro
That's why it looks so good...stock offset is way to conservative and way too tucked in....wheels need to be pushed out and that Black Car has done it perfectly

(i have ET30 fronts and ET33 rears on my winters and the fronts are perfectly flush at ET30)

Cheers to "qship5"...definitely my favourite for stance and wheels!

Are your winter wheel widths 8.5"/10"? I imagine your winter tires are also smaller. Width and offset determine the "stance".

Anyhow, I still don't think that front offset is right. That would be like adding a 19mm front spacer to the stock wheels. It would stick out way past the fender. I just measured myself with calipers.

The rear is doable, but I'd still expect rubbing with a 275-width tire.
Old 03-02-2010, 09:54 PM
  #53  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Are your winter wheel widths 8.5"/10"? Width and offset determine the "stance".

Anyhow, I still don't think that front offset is right. That would be like adding a 19mm front spacer to the stock wheels. It would stick out way past the fender. I just measured myself with calipers.

The rear is doable, but I'd still expect rubbing with a 275-width tire.

They are 8.5 and 9.5.....the fronts dont stick out past the fender...they are flush....
Old 03-02-2010, 10:01 PM
  #54  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by callmiro
They are 8.5 and 9.5.....the fronts don't stick out past the fender...they are flush....
OK, that doesn't make any sense. That's like running a 21mm spacer on a stock wheel. It's certainly not the offset this car was designed for.

Perhaps your definition of "flush" is equitable to my definition of "sticking out too far."

You should post some photos of your winter setup in a separate thread. I'd like to see some pics.
Old 03-02-2010, 10:02 PM
  #55  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
Originally Posted by obsidian05e55
I'm assuming your running 245/35, and 275/30? Any rubbing issue front, or back?
I am running those tire sizes and have a slight rubbing on the rears. Fenders are being rolled on Thursday to fix that.
Old 03-02-2010, 10:08 PM
  #56  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
qship5, can you take some additional pics. I'd love to see a shot "front-to-back" to get a better feel for the stance.

This post is a good comparison -> https://mbworld.org/forums/3865127-post1.html

He's running the same wheels. 19x8.5 ET48 with 245/35-19 Front and 19x10.0 ET50 with 275/30-19 Rear. (Yoko AD-08)
Old 03-02-2010, 10:14 PM
  #57  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
obsidian05e55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Livingston NJ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C63, Grigio Medio E46 M3
The fronts on the black and gold car don't look as good as qships, but the front gold wheel does look pretty flush with the edge of the fender. Definately would love to see more pics of qships car
Old 03-02-2010, 10:55 PM
  #58  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S
Originally Posted by superlubricity
OK, that doesn't make any sense. That's like running a 21mm spacer on a stock wheel. It's certainly not the offset this car was designed for.

Perhaps your definition of "flush" is equitable to my definition of "sticking out too far."

You should post some photos of your winter setup in a separate thread. I'd like to see some pics.

I have pics posted all over the place...do a search....

You are basing your statements on "what you think it might look like in your mind"...my statements are based on fact with the wheels on the car....

As you can even see even in qship5's pics.....his fronts are not sticking out past the fender

21mm is only .89 on an inch...you can easily push the front wheel out that far and not have it go past the fender


Last edited by callmiro; 03-02-2010 at 10:58 PM.
Old 03-02-2010, 11:02 PM
  #59  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by callmiro
As you can even see even in qship5's pics.....his fronts are not sticking out past the fender
Exactly. This is why I do not think the offset is actually ET32.
Old 03-02-2010, 11:47 PM
  #60  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
Some of these are a little dark, but they are the only other pics I've got right now of the wheels on the car.





Old 03-02-2010, 11:52 PM
  #61  
Junior Member
 
calgaryc63amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Exactly. This is why I do not think the offset is actually ET32.
I agree with superlubricity. There's no way that one is running a front offset of ET48 and qship running an ET32. The gold ET48 rims are pretty close to the fenders. One of those has to be wrong.

The only reason I want to know so bad is that I think qship's car looks fantastic.
Old 03-03-2010, 12:42 AM
  #62  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Based on those pics, it's safe to say each car is running a similar front offset. When I ordered mine, James@ACGSD mentioned the recommendation from Forgestar for the C63 front was 8.5"/ET45. (+6mm).

qship5, where did you get the ET32 number for the front? If it was a number on the box it was probably the starting offset of the wheel before they shaved off material to reach the proper offset for your car.

BTW, your car looks great! I can't wait to get my F14s.
Old 03-03-2010, 10:43 AM
  #63  
Super Member
 
benyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
'10 F150 FX4 SCrew. '14 S212S
Pretty sure Forgestar said to ignore the ET on the box.
Old 03-03-2010, 09:14 PM
  #64  
Junior Member
 
calgaryc63amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Does anyone know the weight of these Forgestar F14 wheels? I'm thinking about doing 19x8.5 fronts and 19x10 rears and want to know the different between those and the stock wheels.
Old 03-03-2010, 09:19 PM
  #65  
Super Member
 
benyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
'10 F150 FX4 SCrew. '14 S212S
From this thread:

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-sessanta.html

Originally Posted by chief63
Here is the weight of my F14 wheels:

Front 19X8.5: 23 pounds
Back 19X10: 25 pounds

This was done using a human scale, not an high end electronic one so I can't guarantee the accuracy. The wheels do feel very light.

Here is the official weight from modbargains.com:

19x8.5 Approx weight 22.5 lbs
19x10. Approx weight 24.7 lbs (site says 24.1 but I think they mixed up some numbers)

Both wheels are still lighter than the stock 18" (at 23.5/front and 25.0/back).

For 19" that's pretty impressive.

As a comparison the HRE P43 19x10 are 24.6 pounds and 6000$ per set!
Old 03-03-2010, 10:12 PM
  #66  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Just for accuracy, the front OEM wheel is not 23.5lbs. That was a guess from chief63.

Later in the post the OEM wheel weights are clarified @ ~26lbs front/back -> https://mbworld.org/forums/3932559-post36.html


From this thread:

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief63
Here is the weight of my F14 wheels:

Front 19X8.5: 23 pounds
Back 19X10: 25 pounds

This was done using a human scale, not an high end electronic one so I can't guarantee the accuracy. The wheels do feel very light.

Here is the official weight from modbargains.com:

19x8.5 Approx weight 22.5 lbs
19x10. Approx weight 24.7 lbs (site says 24.1 but I think they mixed up some numbers)

Both wheels are still lighter than the stock 18" (at 23.5/front and 25.0/back).

For 19" that's pretty impressive.

As a comparison the HRE P43 19x10 are 24.6 pounds and 6000$ per set!
Old 03-03-2010, 10:44 PM
  #67  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
According to Forgestar, the front 8.5" wheels are ET45, not ET32 as my supplier had indicated in one of his emails.
Old 03-04-2010, 07:05 PM
  #68  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by qship5
According to Forgestar, the front 8.5" wheels are ET45, not ET32 as my supplier had indicated in one of his emails.
Thanks for clearing that up qship5.

BTW, I love how they look on your car. It really makes me want to get a set of coil-overs.
Old 03-04-2010, 10:48 PM
  #69  
Member
 
chino1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 Mercedes Benz C63 AMG Arctic White PP
Originally Posted by qship5
According to Forgestar, the front 8.5" wheels are ET45, not ET32 as my supplier had indicated in one of his emails.
Do you get any rubbing in the rear ?
Old 03-04-2010, 11:00 PM
  #70  
Super Member
 
nrgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 869
Received 35 Likes on 15 Posts
AMG GT-R
Your car looks AWESOME qship5! I really love those wheels, and the stance. Looks perfect on a black car.

BTW, when I weighed the AMG 19" multispokes, they were right around 29 lbs for front and rear. Too bad they are not lighter
Old 03-04-2010, 11:53 PM
  #71  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HIRO63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by qship5
KW V3s
The drop is just perfect! Love your car.

So what is the set up with KW V3?
Old 03-05-2010, 07:52 AM
  #72  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
Originally Posted by HIRO63
The drop is just perfect! Love your car.

So what is the set up with KW V3?
Not sure I understand your question? Are you asking where they are set heightwise or what rebound/compression settings I'm running?
Old 03-05-2010, 05:28 PM
  #73  
Super Member
 
chief63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
Originally Posted by qship5
Not sure I understand your question? Are you asking where they are set heightwise or what rebound/compression settings I'm running?
I don't know if that's what he meant but I would surely like to know if the installers used the suggested setup from KW (possibly if they did not mention it).

I've also read the manual, how easy is it to change the rebound, damping and height? Do some of these changes require you remove the wheel or lifting the car is fine? It didn't seem that easy!

thanks

Last edited by chief63; 03-05-2010 at 05:32 PM.
Old 03-05-2010, 07:05 PM
  #74  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
1st amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
SLS Irridium silver,2014 GL350 BT Irridium, 2015 White Dodge RAM Hemi Quad
your car is one of the best looking with aftermrket wheels.
Old 03-05-2010, 08:43 PM
  #75  
Super Member
 
qship5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas TX area
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
M5, C63, 335Ci
Originally Posted by chief63
I don't know if that's what he meant but I would surely like to know if the installers used the suggested setup from KW (possibly if they did not mention it).

I've also read the manual, how easy is it to change the rebound, damping and height? Do some of these changes require you remove the wheel or lifting the car is fine? It didn't seem that easy!

thanks

The Installer set the KWs to my requested settings. I have played around with them and determined a "street" setting and a "track" setting. You do not need to remove the wheels to adjust them, but doing so does provide a little more room to reach the bump adjustment. Setting the rebound on the fronts is simple as you can insert the allen wrench into the top of the strut from under the hood at the top of the strut tower. The rears however are impossible to adjust on the car unless you do what I did and drill a small hole in the center of the rear shock tower. There is no hole there from the factory and without one, you would need to remove the rear shock to adjust it. With the hole drilled, I can adjust the rears as easliy as the fronts.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Show me some wheels



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.