So if someone asked why they should buy a C63 over a M3, what would you tell them?




The C63 has way more character without even trying. Its raw and unrefined without caring what anyone thinks about it. The M is fake and trys to compensate for it's lack of power with its handling. Last time i checked, we dont drive on race tracks everyday.
Don't even get me started on the exhaust note. That would be like comparing the bark of a pitbull to the bark of a yorkie.
Go with C63. It's a beast, not a poser. Enough Said.
....Damn that was sooooo good I feel like doing the dance from when the guy on stage hears, "Dwane, in little Jessy's case, you are NOT the father....."
A+

I hope your momma is close by when you discover that the BMW335 doesn't have a 3.5 liter engine (3 Liter TT) and that a 550 doesn't have a 5 liter (4.8L). GASP, THE HORROR!
My understanding of the 6.3 badge is that it harkens back to the 300 SEL 6.3. A similar experiment where they shoehorned a 6.3 liter MB limo engine into a 300 SEL. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_300SEL_6.3.
Dont get me wrong, both are great cars. But the C63 is just a monster compared to the M3.
Last edited by _AMG_; Jul 18, 2010 at 04:40 AM.
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink
You get dual-clutch transmission and electronic damping control. Cool things like CF roof, better iPod/iPhone integration, better navigation, etc.
But you are asking in a C63 forum, what kind of answers do you expect? lol
I hope your momma is close by when you discover that the BMW335 doesn't have a 3.5 liter engine (3 Liter TT) and that a 550 doesn't have a 5 liter (4.8L). GASP, THE HORROR!
My understanding of the 6.3 badge is that it harkens back to the 300 SEL 6.3. A similar experiment where they shoehorned a 6.3 liter MB limo engine into a 300 SEL. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_300SEL_6.3.
335i, does not say 3.5 anywhere in the car...so obviously they are not trying to say the car has 3.5L engine...
Whereas the C63 has 6.3 written on it.
If they had no 6.3 written on the car, and only named it C63, then I wouldn't say anything, cause a car company can name their car whatever the heck they want.
But when you put 6.3, with the "." there, it just makes most people who don't know about this car, think it has a 6.3 liter engine...You may think its obvious, but I think most car fanatic who have not done as much research as C63 owners may not know this...
335i, does not say 3.5 anywhere in the car...so obviously they are not trying to say the car has 3.5L engine...
Whereas the C63 has 6.3 written on it.
If they had no 6.3 written on the car, and only named it C63, then I wouldn't say anything, cause a car company can name their car whatever the heck they want.
But when you put 6.3, with the "." there, it just makes most people who don't know about this car, think it has a 6.3 liter engine...You may think its obvious, but I think most car fanatic who have not done as much research as C63 owners may not know this...
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Cheers!
However I find NellyRod's comment below less helpful, but perhaps I am not taking it with enough 'tongue in cheek' not knowing NellyRod well.

The C63 has way more character without even trying. Its raw and unrefined without caring what anyone thinks about it. The M is fake and trys to compensate for it's lack of power with its handling. Last time i checked, we dont drive on race tracks everyday.
Don't even get me started on the exhaust note. That would be like comparing the bark of a pitbull to the bark of a yorkie.
Go with C63. It's a beast, not a poser. Enough Said.
Thanks for the great reading everyone.

By comparison, the C63 has much more character and "drama" than the E90. It somehow feels more special. You don't have to reach "the top shelf" to access the torque, its available whenever you want it. And the sound...my god the sound. The M3 is very "tinny" and mechanical, like a Ferrari but not as good, and doesn't "sound" powerful. The C63 on the other hand, sounds the part. The M3 handles slightly better on a track, but the limit of grip is more camouflaged. I know exactly when the back is going to step out of the E46, and I know it will be easy to manage. The E90 may be as easy to manage...but in a corner you're unsure of when it will decide to break traction. The C63 communicates this limit much better in my opinion.
In summary, I got rid of the M3 due to its "blahness." I'm sure its great on a track. But 99%+ of my time is on public roads, where the C63 just feels more "fun" and "special."
Oh, and the iPod intergration in the Mercedes is MUCH BETTER than the BMW's, at least in pre-2011 models.



