C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63 or GTR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-29-2010 | 01:37 PM
  #51  
VCA_AMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
'15 E63S wagon
Originally Posted by Rock
Kyle!! One more time. Do not get a GTR as a DD. It is a very desirable car but very focused. Its forte is not as a commuter. If your budget is for one car that's in the 60-90K range, then get the C63. You will be sorry if you get the Nissan.

So save yourself 20K, get a C63 and enjoy numerous lap dances with the coin that you save.
+1 hopefully he'll listen to you.
Old 07-29-2010 | 01:39 PM
  #52  
HBC350's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 15
'18 C63A Cabriolet
Originally Posted by Oliverk
um, what?

The c63 has the same hard plastic everywhere that the GTR does. The GTR though, does have some leather on the dash.

The C class is not luxurious, period.
In almost every comparison I make between German and Japanese I come to the same conclusion... German. Feels more solid, looks more solid, doesn't rattle as much, it's just frieking German. Period. I can't place exactly what the Japanese feel is the result of, but it just ain't great. Tinny, hollow, cheapo. IMHO. I could be wrong.
Old 07-29-2010 | 02:49 PM
  #53  
VCA_AMG's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 2
From: So Cal
'15 E63S wagon
You're not wrong.
Old 07-29-2010 | 03:14 PM
  #54  
Quadcammer's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 38
From: Clifton, NJ
96 and 08 911 turbos
Originally Posted by HBC350
In almost every comparison I make between German and Japanese I come to the same conclusion... German. Feels more solid, looks more solid, doesn't rattle as much, it's just frieking German. Period. I can't place exactly what the Japanese feel is the result of, but it just ain't great. Tinny, hollow, cheapo. IMHO. I could be wrong.
Its hardly ever a direct comparison on price.

I also think that the difference has gotten much smaller.

Feels more solid=not in my view
looks more solid= can't say i agree. The C interior looks very cheap
doesn't rattle= haven't had a car with any noticeable rattles in 10 years
German engineering and build quality is largely a myth these days, especially at lower price points. Sure, the S65s/Audi S8/SLS etc are good, but overall, thats mostly in the past.

Tinny, hollow, and cheap may be the case in entry level econo boxes, but not in a decent car.

Every lexus I've been in felt substantial and solid.
Old 07-29-2010 | 07:31 PM
  #55  
MikeS54's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 436
Likes: 1
From: Richmond BC Canada
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Oliverk
Its hardly ever a direct comparison on price.

I also think that the difference has gotten much smaller.

Feels more solid=not in my view
looks more solid= can't say i agree. The C interior looks very cheap
doesn't rattle= haven't had a car with any noticeable rattles in 10 years
German engineering and build quality is largely a myth these days, especially at lower price points. Sure, the S65s/Audi S8/SLS etc are good, but overall, thats mostly in the past.

Tinny, hollow, and cheap may be the case in entry level econo boxes, but not in a decent car.

Every lexus I've been in felt substantial and solid.

Japanese luxury cars are well built overall now days but Japanese performance cars are not that solid compare to its german rivals.

Personaly i had a lot of seat time in my friend's GTR which he recently sold in favor of a M5. The GTR's brake squeels like a ****** *****, ride like its on harsh coilovers and has been constantly rattling ever since day one of his purchase. I mean if you look for ultimate performance for the least money Japanese cars are the way to go. Either its GTR,STI,Evo they are all exceptionally good performers but if you are looking for a better overall package German cars are the way to go.
Old 07-30-2010 | 02:53 AM
  #56  
BoostJunky's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Fl
A couple toys
You run into GTRs far less than you do C63. I love em both so this is pretty hard, but i'd probably go with the gtr
Old 07-31-2010 | 01:45 PM
  #57  
AMG Powerrr's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Werkendam, Holland, Europe.
1999 Coupé Fiat 1.8 16v
I'd like a C63! But if you want something fast, get yourself a Switzer P800 GTR!
Old 08-03-2010 | 09:42 PM
  #58  
alms21's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
From: Frederick, MD
'17 CLS550
For $80K I'd be buying a CLK63 AMG Black Series
Attached Thumbnails C63 or GTR-user34876_pic11595_1268516375.jpg   C63 or GTR-user34876_pic11536_1268183933.jpg  
Old 08-04-2010 | 08:01 AM
  #59  
lap time's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 97
Likes: 7
2017 E63S (due in May), 2013 GTR, 2013 Exige S
I am driving both.

GTR speed in both straight n turns are unbelievable!!!! crazy . with little $$ on mod. you can hav same straight line speed as Gallardo 560-4 and slightly quicker than Gallardo supperleggera (at least from 0-220km/hr).

but i have heard approx. 6-7 out of 10 of my friends experience gear box breaks down and it costs around US 10000 - 15000 to repair (depends where it breaks...) Including myself.

but i had never have a problem w my c63 no matter how hard u drive it...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63 or GTR



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 PM.