C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Review And C63 Finishes Last

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-12-2010, 08:49 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
The C63 came in last, but that's like saying Cindy Crawford came in last in a 4 group super model contest. There are no losers.
Old 08-12-2010, 08:50 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
soldier2304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
I really dont see what people see in that RS5, it looks exactly the same as the current S5 in the states IMHO, what's so different apart from the engine?

Also every review they do with the C63 is perfect most of the time it comes out on top. Now you have ONE review where it comes out last and everybody is tense lol... Our car is just awesome and both AUDI and BMW owners can't touch it
Old 08-12-2010, 08:50 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
dremorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
2015 Jaguar F-Type R Coupe' '99' Audi A4 Avant Quattro 2.8 DD
They should wait until the C63AMG coupe' comes out next year. If it does, I'll be trading mine in.
Old 08-12-2010, 09:29 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
ATL_MB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hong Kong/Charlotte
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63
I wonder what difference having ESP "on" has. I haven't driven the other cars, but the C63's ESP is very intrusive at the limit, and would significantly slow the car in the slalom and track events.

Not sure if the other cars' ESP would have as much of an impact.
Old 08-12-2010, 09:41 PM
  #30  
Administrator

Thread Starter
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,064
Received 514 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Originally Posted by soldier2304
I really dont see what people see in that RS5, it looks exactly the same as the current S5 in the states IMHO, what's so different apart from the engine?
While I appreciate your passion for Mercedes you need to stop drinking their Kool-Aid. It's okay to admire other cars besides the one you own.

The differences between the RS5 and S5 are just as pronounced as the differences between a C63 and a base C-class.

RS5 Offerings:
Engine (BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!)
• High-revving, normally aspirated V8 displacing 4,163 cc
• The crankcase is a bedplate construction. The lower bearing bridges for the crankshaft are integrated into a common frame for maximum rigidity and optimal vibration behavior. The cast iron bearing bridges reduce the thermal expansion of the crankcase and thus keep the play at the main bearings of the crankshaft within tight limits.
• Recuperation system and additional efficiency technologies standard


Drivetrain
• Seven-speed S tronic dual-clutch transmission
• New quattro technology with (self-locking) crown-gear center differential and torque vectoring
• Sport differential for variable power distribution between rear wheels

Chassis
• Audi drive select driving dynamics system, optional dynamic steering
• High-performance brakes, with carbon fiber-ceramic discs available
• ESP stabilization program with Sport mode, can be deactivated
• Sport suspension plus, with Dynamic Ride Control variable damping

Body
• Coupe design with distinctive sporty accents
• Xenon plus headlights with LED daytime running lights and LED taillights
• Flared wheel wells front and rear, side extensions. The underbody of the RS 5 Coupé is largely lined with plastic cladding. It integrates NACA air vents and airfoils for the brakes, the seven-speed S tronic and center differential. At highway speeds, the aerodynamic characteristics of the high-performance coupe generate downforce to further enhance stability. The Audi RS 5 Coupé is 4,649 millimeters long, 1,860 millimeters wide and 1,366 millimeters high (15.25 x 6.1 x 4.48 ft), making it 24 millimeters (0.94 in) longer and 6 millimeters (0.24 in) wider than the A5. It is 6 millimeters (0.24 in) lower in height. Its body boasts high rigidity at low weight; the front fenders are made of aluminum. A strut brace further reinforces the front end.Interior and controls

Interior
• Exclusive interior with carbon inlays
• Power-adjustable sport seats; bucket seats with folding backrests and climate-controlled comfort seats
• Specially designed instruments with lap timer and oil temperature gauge
• Optional hard drive navigation system with Bang & Olufsen sound system
• Advanced driver assistance systems available

Last edited by Rock; 08-13-2010 at 05:59 AM.
Old 08-12-2010, 10:09 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
The RS5 is going to be gorgeous, but as with all Audis, will be pretty expensive, I'm sure. Any pricing out yet?
Old 08-12-2010, 10:15 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
This is what I want:

M3 chassis, suspension and weight
RS5 drivetrain and stunning good looks
C63 motor tuned with long tube headers from the factory
Old 08-13-2010, 12:58 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by harrower
OMG...guess Yokohama are now OEM for C63. Run for the hills. See here
http://www2.yokohama-online.com/gb/t...ucts.php?g=404

C63 (W204)
235/35ZR19 XL Advan Sport (V103S MO) F
255/30ZR19 XL Advan Sport (V103S MO) R


Wow, as much as I hated the P-zeros, I am glad I am on my last OEM pair before moving to PS2. Bet we will see a whole lot of new threads in the C63 board complaining about the Yokos they got OEM
I'm not so sure that means they are going to be the only C63 OEM tires and in all markets. That Yoko website also says they also come on the 997 C4, but I haven't seen a new 997 C4 with them here in the US. They usually come in the US with Potenzas or PS2s. Maybe Yokos are available in other markets.
Old 08-13-2010, 03:00 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
harrower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2009 C63, 2007 GL 450
Originally Posted by norb
The RS5 is going to be gorgeous, but as with all Audis, will be pretty expensive, I'm sure. Any pricing out yet?
Cheapest one I have seen here in Europe is here.
http://suchen.mobile.de/fahrzeuge/sh...mber=1&lang=en

70k Euro = $89,600 but that included 19% VAT. If you exported car from EU the car would be VAT exempt = $71,600
Old 08-13-2010, 03:02 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
harrower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2009 C63, 2007 GL 450
Originally Posted by 220S
I'm not so sure that means they are going to be the only C63 OEM tires and in all markets. That Yoko website also says they also come on the 997 C4, but I haven't seen a new 997 C4 with them here in the US. They usually come in the US with Potenzas or PS2s. Maybe Yokos are available in other markets.
Probably true. But this was German mag and you would think MBZ would stick with Conti or P-zero since are both European and familiar to most customers here.
Old 08-13-2010, 06:29 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
olszowa12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gdynia, Poland
Posts: 4,645
Received 66 Likes on 49 Posts
'08 C63 Estate
WTF? Why do they keep comparing a 4-door performance car like the C63 to coupes? They should take an M3 limo.

I know the C63 was my first choice, it still is, and would be my first choice in a year's time. The RS5 is 2secs slower to 200km/h although it's a quattro.

I would rank it this way:
1) C63
2) M3
3) Rs5
4) Alpina

Last edited by olszowa12; 08-13-2010 at 06:34 AM.
Old 08-13-2010, 06:37 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
olszowa12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gdynia, Poland
Posts: 4,645
Received 66 Likes on 49 Posts
'08 C63 Estate
Originally Posted by Rock
I don't usually post in this forum but I saw this review on another site and thought you guys may be interested. I would tell you to enjoy but.........


Rock, do you know what magazine this is from and when was it out? AUTO MOTOR SPORT perhaps?
Old 08-13-2010, 07:18 AM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
harrower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2009 C63, 2007 GL 450
This probably more accurate comparison test. http://www.sportauto-online.de/vergl...t-1037082.html
BMW still cam ahead on overall rating but the speed tests seem more accurate for non-PP related cars. I also noticed that M3s come stock with 265 in rear whereas C63 come with 255s as we know.
Old 08-13-2010, 08:42 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MRAMG1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 3,341
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
S600, GL450, Audi A5 Cab
Originally Posted by Rock
Agreed!! It will be here next year.


Am I the only one that thinks that front grill looks stupid to say the least

It's reminiscent of the Chrysler 300 if you ask me.

Great engine, but come on I don't live in Brooklyn
Old 08-13-2010, 09:37 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ZephyrAMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Relocated
Posts: 4,418
Received 381 Likes on 237 Posts
2010 Irridium Silver MB C63 AMG Sedan
Is it just me or does it only have one fog light in the lower right?


In any event, it looks killer and I have always wanted one since I saw the first pictures and with the release of the S5 itself, I knew it was going to look menacing. Somehow it doesn't even have that much fender flare but the body and contours make it look thick and beefy. I really like the concave wheels and huge front vent.
Old 08-13-2010, 09:59 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
soldier2304's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C63 AMG(sold), 2009 CL550, 2010 S550 Majestic Black, 2010 ML550, 2006 C230, 2009 Venza
Originally Posted by Rock
While I appreciate your passion for Mercedes you need to stop drinking their Kool-Aid. It's okay to admire other cars besides the one you own.

The differences between the RS5 and S5 are just as pronounced as the differences between a C63 and a base C-class.

RS5 Offerings:
Engine (BEAUTIFUL!!!!!!!!!)
• High-revving, normally aspirated V8 displacing 4,163 cc
• The crankcase is a bedplate construction. The lower bearing bridges for the crankshaft are integrated into a common frame for maximum rigidity and optimal vibration behavior. The cast iron bearing bridges reduce the thermal expansion of the crankcase and thus keep the play at the main bearings of the crankshaft within tight limits.
• Recuperation system and additional efficiency technologies standard


Drivetrain
• Seven-speed S tronic dual-clutch transmission
• New quattro technology with (self-locking) crown-gear center differential and torque vectoring
• Sport differential for variable power distribution between rear wheels

Chassis
• Audi drive select driving dynamics system, optional dynamic steering
• High-performance brakes, with carbon fiber-ceramic discs available
• ESP stabilization program with Sport mode, can be deactivated
• Sport suspension plus, with Dynamic Ride Control variable damping

Body
• Coupe design with distinctive sporty accents
• Xenon plus headlights with LED daytime running lights and LED taillights
• Flared wheel wells front and rear, side extensions. The underbody of the RS 5 Coupé is largely lined with plastic cladding. It integrates NACA air vents and airfoils for the brakes, the seven-speed S tronic and center differential. At highway speeds, the aerodynamic characteristics of the high-performance coupe generate downforce to further enhance stability. The Audi RS 5 Coupé is 4,649 millimeters long, 1,860 millimeters wide and 1,366 millimeters high (15.25 x 6.1 x 4.48 ft), making it 24 millimeters (0.94 in) longer and 6 millimeters (0.24 in) wider than the A5. It is 6 millimeters (0.24 in) lower in height. Its body boasts high rigidity at low weight; the front fenders are made of aluminum. A strut brace further reinforces the front end.Interior and controls

Interior
• Exclusive interior with carbon inlays
• Power-adjustable sport seats; bucket seats with folding backrests and climate-controlled comfort seats
• Specially designed instruments with lap timer and oil temperature gauge
• Optional hard drive navigation system with Bang & Olufsen sound system
• Advanced driver assistance systems available
OK Rock I really appreciate the RS5 inside scoop, you can now make a commercial for Audi... About the Mercedes Kool-Aid the other day i almost bought an A4? It's actually the only Audi that is not overpriced like the rest and it looks and feels much better than the 3 series. This Audi RS5 is going to be close to $100k and still going to be much behind the competition (same with the RS4) including the new AMG lineup and the new M engines coming out. Now a car I'm really looking forward to is the new M5... That's gonna be insane



Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Old 08-13-2010, 10:45 AM
  #42  
Administrator

Thread Starter
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,064
Received 514 Likes on 111 Posts
Drives Slowly
Originally Posted by olszowa12
Rock, do you know what magazine this is from and when was it out? AUTO MOTOR SPORT perhaps?
You got it!! I would guess that it just hit the stands but not positive.
Old 08-13-2010, 11:14 AM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SebringSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
R8
Interesting to see Audi's not using a flat-bottom steering wheel on the RS5.
Old 08-13-2010, 12:28 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
norb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas - USA
Posts: 1,634
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
2009 C63 AMG
Maybe the one foglight is a night vision light, or a radar cruise emitter? If its close to $100K, they aren't going to sell a lot of them.
Old 08-13-2010, 12:42 PM
  #45  
Newbie
 
Cederick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Why does everyone get so offended when a magazine doesnt rate their car #1?
All of these cars are great car, IMO everyone of them could be on top depending on who drives it because all of them are closely match and each of them have their speciality, ie C63 superb engine, M3's nice handling/comfortable, Audi's interior and AWD.
Old 08-13-2010, 12:45 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
iatacs19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
axe muderer with headlights
Originally Posted by ZephyrAMG
Is it just me or does it only have one fog light in the lower right?
It's the radar cruise control module.
Old 08-13-2010, 01:01 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
KCviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
13 Lamborghini SL, 09 C63, Vipers (sold)
Originally Posted by olszowa12
WTF? Why do they keep comparing a 4-door performance car like the C63 to coupes? They should take an M3 limo.

I know the C63 was my first choice, it still is, and would be my first choice in a year's time. The RS5 is 2secs slower to 200km/h although it's a quattro.

I would rank it this way:
1) C63
2) M3
3) Rs5
4) Alpina
Seems like comparing apples to oranges to me. Yes the cars are similar, but the fact that one has 4 doors and all the others don't seems a little off to me. I'm no structural engineer, but this would have to affect structural rigidity......and ultimately performance.
Old 08-13-2010, 02:56 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMGC60-3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: N.Jersey and New York, stationed in Germany
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W164 ML500,SMART For two,1994 C280(5speed manual) 1999 C230k station wagon
Originally Posted by Rock
You got it!! I would guess that it just hit the stands but not positive.
If this artical was from Auto Motor und Sport then MB always loses. Besides Hockenheim ring was a great high speed track until they changed it into a Mickey Mouse course. The Hockenheim ring is not a optimal track for the C63.
Old 08-13-2010, 03:00 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
220S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,336
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Porsche 991S, Cayenne S, 1972 BMW 3.0CS E9 Coupe
Originally Posted by MRAMG1
Am I the only one that thinks that front grill looks stupid to say the least

It's reminiscent of the Chrysler 300 if you ask me.

Great engine, but come on I don't live in Brooklyn
I like Audis and I'm seriously thinking of getting a 2011 S4 to replace my Bimmer. But that front grill....... I don't know if I can get passed it. It does look a little less huge with a Euro plate, but with no plate or a US plate, it looks like a big giant clown mouth. Some car magazines used to call it a "Billy the Big Bass Mouth Grill." It looks even more ridiculous on the A6.

I think we're stuck with it, it's kinda now become their trademark of sorts like the kidneys on the Bimmers.
Old 08-13-2010, 03:02 PM
  #50  
Member
 
aroonkl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
996tt Protomotive, C63
I could not tell from the begining. After you said it, I checked RS5 and S5. Wow only the grill makes a lot different. RS5 looks awesome.
It would be lots of fun with the dual clutch and high rev engine.






Originally Posted by soldier2304
I really dont see what people see in that RS5, it looks exactly the same as the current S5 in the states IMHO, what's so different apart from the engine?

Last edited by aroonkl; 08-13-2010 at 03:05 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: New Review And C63 Finishes Last



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.