C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

which chip is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-01-2010, 08:08 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by E55AMGGG04
YOYOYOYO GONIII whats going on here bro lol. Don't tell me your going to make me get out of my stock stage !!!! ahahahahh

Let me know what happens man cauz ill tune/pulley/he next day .
I still have not run your lightly modded E55. Did you read the kill section where I owned the low 11s@120+mph Jeep?
Old 10-01-2010, 08:10 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
Yeah what a rip off My OE-tuning got it for fraction of that price. Oh yeah it pulls like a ****! WHOA!
What's a fraction? 1/8 1/4. And what's a ****? Is that a new kind of test.
Old 10-01-2010, 08:17 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jons95c36amg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Desert
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
02 CLK 55 AMG,09 C63 loaded with P30
Originally Posted by dodger63
What's a fraction? 1/8 1/4. And what's a ****? Is that a new kind of test.
$1100. ****-mother****er
Old 10-01-2010, 08:24 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
So about half. Can't wait to see what a true test of this so called **** = to. good luck.
Post some 1/4 mile times asap
Old 10-01-2010, 09:15 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMGGG04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 w211 E55
Originally Posted by Raleighc63
E55AMGGG04 - what kind of pipes do you have on that beast? No stock are they?
I just put in straight pipes.

Heres a link to pix and sound .


https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-mufflers.html

Last edited by E55AMGGG04; 10-01-2010 at 09:19 PM.
Old 10-01-2010, 09:16 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
E55AMGGG04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
04 w211 E55
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I still have not run your lightly modded E55. Did you read the kill section where I owned the low 11s@120+mph Jeep?
Your not coming to this track rental are you ? If not we definetly going to have set up a time n place thats convient for both of us. Will be interesting to see your car run with just tune only.
Old 10-02-2010, 12:19 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
503C43 ////AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 4,433
Received 42 Likes on 33 Posts
1999 C43, 2008 P30 E63, 2014 SQ5, 2024 Model Y Performance
Originally Posted by Goni C63
which chip should i go with? OE tune or MHP?
Here is some interesting info:

Superlubricity - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, evosport pulley, Nitto Drag Radials
1.796 60', 11.744 @ 119.18 MPH (1/8th 7.595 @ 94.59 MPH)

B.E.R.U.A.N.G - Eurocharged Tune, Street Tires
2.044 60', 12.364 @ 115.45 MPH (1/8th 8.079 @ 91.42 MPH)

Avengerboater - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, Street Tires
2.281 60', 12.554 @ 119.17 MPH (1/8th 8.396 @ 93.81 MPH)

Even Money - Stock Tune, Nitto Drag Radials
1.916 60', 12.557 @ 111.37 MPH (1/8th 8.127 @ 88.33 MPH)
2.063 60', 12.710 @ 111.77 MPH (1/8th 8.293 @ 88.47 MPH)

Cek - Stock P31 Tune, Street Tires
2.118 60', 12.584 @ 114.31 MPH (1/8th 8.260 @ 90.64 MPH)
2.396 60', 12.890 @ 115.26 MPH (1/8th 8.595 @ 90.95 MPH)

Nrgy - MHP Tune, MHP Catted Headers, Carbonio Airbox, Street Tires
2.300 60', 12.691 @ 118.79 MPH (1/8th 8.443 @ 91.90 MPH)
2.477 60', 12.990 @ 119.04 MPH (1/8th 8.761 @ 91.89 MPH)

All of these runs took place on the same day at the same track..... The 2nd quickest ET was a Eurocharged tune and only a tune.
Old 10-02-2010, 12:38 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
Yeah what a rip off My OE-tuning got it for fraction of that price. Oh yeah it pulls like a ****! WHOA!
Originally Posted by 503C43 ////AMG
Here is some interesting info:

Superlubricity - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, evosport pulley, Nitto Drag Radials
1.796 60', 11.744 @ 119.18 MPH (1/8th 7.595 @ 94.59 MPH)

B.E.R.U.A.N.G - Eurocharged Tune, Street Tires
2.044 60', 12.364 @ 115.45 MPH (1/8th 8.079 @ 91.42 MPH)

Avengerboater - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, Street Tires
2.281 60', 12.554 @ 119.17 MPH (1/8th 8.396 @ 93.81 MPH)

Even Money - Stock Tune, Nitto Drag Radials
1.916 60', 12.557 @ 111.37 MPH (1/8th 8.127 @ 88.33 MPH)
2.063 60', 12.710 @ 111.77 MPH (1/8th 8.293 @ 88.47 MPH)

Cek - Stock P31 Tune, Street Tires
2.118 60', 12.584 @ 114.31 MPH (1/8th 8.260 @ 90.64 MPH)
2.396 60', 12.890 @ 115.26 MPH (1/8th 8.595 @ 90.95 MPH)

Nrgy - MHP Tune, MHP Catted Headers, Carbonio Airbox, Street Tires
2.300 60', 12.691 @ 118.79 MPH (1/8th 8.443 @ 91.90 MPH)
2.477 60', 12.990 @ 119.04 MPH (1/8th 8.761 @ 91.89 MPH)

All of these runs took place on the same day at the same track..... The 2nd quickest ET was a Eurocharged tune and only a tune.
Those don't look like good numbers at all.
Look at the Mph that's the important part in that comp!!

Last edited by dodger63; 10-02-2010 at 12:40 AM.
Old 10-02-2010, 01:36 AM
  #34  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by 503C43 ////AMG
Here is some interesting info:
All of these runs took place on the same day at the same track..... The 2nd quickest ET was a Eurocharged tune and only a tune.
Very interesting data, but not when analyzed by someone "not in the know."

You can't look at the ETs alone ignoring all the other data. I edited my post (where you copied this from without citing me as the author) to include a MPH-sort. MPH is a much better indicator of Horsepower.

Anyhow, B.E.R.U.A.N.G's car was neck in neck with the P31 stock car all day long. They actually tied ET and MPH (low 114's) twice when they ran heads-up. I've got all 150+ runs from today in front of me. It wasn't until I layed down about 2/3 of my Nitto tread on a well prepped lane when he made an incredible pass as he finally got some traction on those street tires.
Old 10-02-2010, 01:44 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
Originally Posted by superlubricity
Very interesting data, but not when analyzed by someone "not in the know."

You can't look at the ETs alone ignoring all the other data. I edited my post (where you copied this from without citing me as the author) to include a MPH-sort. MPH is a much better indicator of Horsepower.

Anyhow, B.E.R.U.A.N.G's car was neck in neck with the P31 stock car all day long. They actually tied ET and MPH (low 114's) twice when they ran heads-up. I've got all 150+ runs from today in front of me. It wasn't until I layed down about 2/3 of my Nitto tread on a well prepped lane when he made an incredible pass as he finally got some traction on those street tires.

Said well amuture talk. When a (tuned car) pulls the same mph as a stock car it's not that impressive?
Old 10-02-2010, 01:51 AM
  #36  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by dodger63
Said well, a mature talk. When a (tuned car) pulls the same mph as a stock car it's not that impressive?
Not when the stock car is tuned by MB at the factory as part of the P31 package. We've seen these P31 cars make the same power as aftermarket-tuned cars on the same dyno. It's expected that they would perform the same at the track.
Old 10-02-2010, 02:03 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
I'm not pretending to be an expert but it still doesn't seem impresive idk just me maybe.. But I've seen stock cars do way better then those # I'm sure u guys have much different conditions up there? But keep up the great work!
Old 10-02-2010, 02:10 AM
  #38  
Super Moderator Alumni
 
superlubricity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2011 GLK 350, 2013 GT-R, & 2013 RAM 1500
Originally Posted by dodger63
I'm not pretending to be an expert but it still doesn't seem impresive idk just me maybe.. But I've seen stock cars do way better then those # I'm sure u guys have much different conditions up there? But keep up the great work!
Yes, conditions are much different here in the Rainy/Humid Pacific Northwest. It was also surprisingly warm today. High-70's all afternoon. I wish we had your cool dry Northeast air. MIR and Atco are amazing tracks.
Old 10-02-2010, 02:24 AM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dodger63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 3,317
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
2013 f250 6.7 diesel
I just did Mir 2 weeks ago 20 runs in 82+ degree temps ran 11.7s all day. My car bested an 11.56 @ 123. I'll be at atco the 7th with much better conditions since we dropped to about 60 as highs.. Well anyway keep up the good work over there!
Old 10-02-2010, 08:10 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Wish I could go to Atco on the 7th to show some numbers.

The OE tune is putting down some major numbers. Jeremy is the man. Get yourself to TTM on the 12th and find out for yourself! Before and after are two different cars. (See my Dyno thread)


As to the price, MHP is significantly higher. I honestly dont see how MHP could be making more power tune for tune than the OE. If they have id like to see the dyno to prove it. So in my mind the OE is the way to go!

Im shooting for Maryland in Oct so I hope there is a tune only MHP there for me to run.
Old 10-02-2010, 08:59 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ny
Posts: 4,454
Received 30 Likes on 29 Posts
Anything W/4Wheels
Originally Posted by propain
Wish I could go to Atco on the 7th to show some numbers.

The OE tune is putting down some major numbers. Jeremy is the man. Get yourself to TTM on the 12th and find out for yourself! Before and after are two different cars. (See my Dyno thread)


As to the price, MHP is significantly higher. I honestly dont see how MHP could be making more power tune for tune than the OE. If they have id like to see the dyno to prove it. So in my mind the OE is the way to go!

Im shooting for Maryland in Oct so I hope there is a tune only MHP there for me to run.
there will be on there. tune filters like you just MHP VS OE
Old 10-02-2010, 09:46 AM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
Walnuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63 AMG (Marrano Tune and K&N airfilters)
Originally Posted by 503C43 ////AMG
Here is some interesting info:

Superlubricity - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, evosport pulley, Nitto Drag Radials
1.796 60', 11.744 @ 119.18 MPH (1/8th 7.595 @ 94.59 MPH)

B.E.R.U.A.N.G - Eurocharged Tune, Street Tires
2.044 60', 12.364 @ 115.45 MPH (1/8th 8.079 @ 91.42 MPH)

Avengerboater - Kleemann K2 Tune, MHP Catless Headers, Street Tires
2.281 60', 12.554 @ 119.17 MPH (1/8th 8.396 @ 93.81 MPH)

Even Money - Stock Tune, Nitto Drag Radials
1.916 60', 12.557 @ 111.37 MPH (1/8th 8.127 @ 88.33 MPH)
2.063 60', 12.710 @ 111.77 MPH (1/8th 8.293 @ 88.47 MPH)

Cek - Stock P31 Tune, Street Tires
2.118 60', 12.584 @ 114.31 MPH (1/8th 8.260 @ 90.64 MPH)
2.396 60', 12.890 @ 115.26 MPH (1/8th 8.595 @ 90.95 MPH)

Nrgy - MHP Tune, MHP Catted Headers, Carbonio Airbox, Street Tires
2.300 60', 12.691 @ 118.79 MPH (1/8th 8.443 @ 91.90 MPH)
2.477 60', 12.990 @ 119.04 MPH (1/8th 8.761 @ 91.89 MPH)

All of these runs took place on the same day at the same track..... The 2nd quickest ET was a Eurocharged tune and only a tune.

I just dont get it, all the extra hp that is claimed from the tunes yet so little difference on the track. My stock c63 pulled a 12.43 quarter mile so i would expect that with up to an extra 60 to 70hp from a tune a quarter mile time of a tuned would be significantly less than stock, whats going on, is it just dyno trickery?

I also agree with the costs of these tunes being way too expensive. In Perth it will cost me $3000 for a power chip tune or $4000 for a MHP tune, this is obscene considering it is just a software modification and there is no raw material added as there would be with say an exhaust system upgrade.

Can someone convince me it is worth the expense as i am yet to see the raw data on quarter mile times before i pull my wallet out.
Old 10-02-2010, 09:53 AM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by Walnuts
I just dont get it, all the extra hp that is claimed from the tunes yet so little difference on the track. My stock c63 pulled a 12.43 quarter mile so i would expect that with up to an extra 60 to 70hp from a tune a quarter mile time of a tuned would be significantly less than stock, whats going on, is it just dyno trickery?

I also agree with the costs of these tunes being way too expensive. In Perth it will cost me $3000 for a power chip tune or $4000 for a MHP tune, this is obscene considering it is just a software modification and there is no raw material added as there would be with say an exhaust system upgrade.

Can someone convince me it is worth the expense as i am yet to see the raw data on quarter mile times before i pull my wallet out.
Most of those cars were on 18 and 19" street tires. ET is tremendously dependent on traction and launch (i.e. 60' times). Trap speed (MPH at 1/4) isn't to the same degree. You can see that the higher horsepower cars have picked up about 8 MPH in 1/4 mile trap speed over a stock car, as well as about 4 MPH in trap over a tune-only (either P31 or aftermarket) car. Same track, same day. Put all of these cars on real DRs, and you'll start to see a divergence in both trap and ET. IMHO.
Old 10-02-2010, 12:31 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Dr_jitsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 E350, 2002 GT2, 2004 SC M3, 2010 C63
Don't look at ET's as driver skill, drag radials etc affect them.

Look at trap speed as the true measure of power and performance. It is interesting tha a tune alone car (in this case Eurocharged) has a trap speed w/ in 3.7 mph of cars with headers, pulleys, etc.
Old 10-02-2010, 12:35 PM
  #45  
Super Member
 
RStevens63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63
Originally Posted by Walnuts
I just dont get it, all the extra hp that is claimed from the tunes yet so little difference on the track. My stock c63 pulled a 12.43 quarter mile so i would expect that with up to an extra 60 to 70hp from a tune a quarter mile time of a tuned would be significantly less than stock, whats going on, is it just dyno trickery?

I also agree with the costs of these tunes being way too expensive. In Perth it will cost me $3000 for a power chip tune or $4000 for a MHP tune, this is obscene considering it is just a software modification and there is no raw material added as there would be with say an exhaust system upgrade.

Can someone convince me it is worth the expense as i am yet to see the raw data on quarter mile times before i pull my wallet out.
If you dont have tires you can have all the power in the world and it won't matter. Remember all the Supra jokes, they are highway monsters but at the track usually run high ET and high MPH lol.

1 tuner has 4 tune and drag radial C63s running in the 11s I don't know of anyone else that has put a single car into the same 11s.

If you are complaining about the price of a $2500 tune, you should check out MKB $6500 and Vath $10,500 or Brabus ($???).

Just because its software doesnt mean its all the same and I agree dynos mean nothing compared to track data. Its not the dynos fault its just that shops have abused that measuring stick by playing with results way too much.
Old 10-02-2010, 02:01 PM
  #46  
Super Member
 
B.E.R.U.A.N.G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK 500(Gone), C63 FTW!
beofre it's getting worst...Me and Avenger are FIRST TIMER...so..that's effect alot for the results....My 12.364 was there after 30+ pulls...or heck I may even do 40+ pulls, because some of my pull wasnt recorded (The time slip didnt print)

So...yeah please dont forget that in the equation

Regarding ECU Tune, I am using Uerocharged, which is the cheapest...since I dont really track my car that often...+50 RWHP is more than enough for me. (I havent dyno it, but that's other got from Eurocharged tune.)

Old 10-02-2010, 04:34 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c32AMG-DTM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 A8L, 2002 996TT X50, 2009 X5
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
Don't look at ET's as driver skill, drag radials etc affect them.

Look at trap speed as the true measure of power and performance. It is interesting tha a tune alone car (in this case Eurocharged) has a trap speed w/ in 3.7 mph of cars with headers, pulleys, etc.
+1

It's also interesting that the stock P31 car is within 0.19 MPH of the Eurocharged-tuned car.

If I was a P31 owner, I probably wouldn't bother to do "tune-only" from any vendor... it appears likely that AMG's in-house "tune" takes most of (if not all of) the easy software-related HP off the table.
Old 10-02-2010, 05:50 PM
  #48  
Member
 
AMMO1000hp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Not getting into which is better but I will personally vouch for Jeremy's work. He is not only great to work with but his tuning and pricing is hard to match. Within 30mins in his hands my car was completely transformed and the gains really showed and backed it all up on the dyno. He really has a solid tune for our platform. I will only work with him from here on out for any of my cars. That is if, I am lucky enough to have some of his precious time because he is super busy but I would be too if I had the knowledge, skill, and the service he provides. If all goes as planned I will be testing his stage2 w/headers soon. Should be quite interesting! PM me if you need any info or questions.
Old 10-02-2010, 06:06 PM
  #49  
Super Member
 
RStevens63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E63
Originally Posted by Dr_jitsu
Don't look at ET's as driver skill, drag radials etc affect them.

Look at trap speed as the true measure of power and performance. It is interesting tha a tune alone car (in this case Eurocharged) has a trap speed w/ in 3.7 mph of cars with headers, pulleys, etc.
Exactly everyone was running differnet tires and it showed in the 60 foot times.

I bet the guys with tune and headers probably had to pedal it out of the gate but the tune only car which ran after super laid down some rubber probably was in it the whole time. I wouldnt go race a header & tune car without DRs.
Old 10-02-2010, 06:22 PM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
RNS-11Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
Received 101 Likes on 50 Posts
09 C63
Originally Posted by Walnuts
I just dont get it, all the extra hp that is claimed from the tunes yet so little difference on the track. My stock c63 pulled a 12.43 quarter mile so i would expect that with up to an extra 60 to 70hp from a tune a quarter mile time of a tuned would be significantly less than stock, whats going on, is it just dyno trickery?

I also agree with the costs of these tunes being way too expensive. In Perth it will cost me $3000 for a power chip tune or $4000 for a MHP tune, this is obscene considering it is just a software modification and there is no raw material added as there would be with say an exhaust system upgrade.

Can someone convince me it is worth the expense as i am yet to see the raw data on quarter mile times before i pull my wallet out.
That is some crazy prices!!!
Call my mechanic James at BPS chiptek. With tune and exhaust ive gained 8mph over stock 112 to 121mph.
I think we can see from all the data track conditions and tyre choice play a major role in ets and mph.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: which chip is better?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM.