Nov. 2010 Automobile Mag article
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
'09 SL Black, '12 ML63, '13 SL63, '14 E63 Wagon, '14 458 Italia
Nov. 2010 Automobile Mag article
Another M3 vs. C63 article. They do have both cars in arrest-me-red, so that's a plus. You can probably guess who wins and why... Damn track tests...
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
#3
I've always been a BMW fan and have never learned how to appreciate MB until just recently when I test drove and bought the C63!
It's really the how the cars are tested in magazines that makes one think that BMW is always the best. But in reality, BMW just fits very well in the tests used...and the test used are not always a representation of what we want in a car!
I'm still happy w my BMW and decided to keep an e46 m3 for the long term but I am glad I "discovered" the real talents of an AMG!
It's really the how the cars are tested in magazines that makes one think that BMW is always the best. But in reality, BMW just fits very well in the tests used...and the test used are not always a representation of what we want in a car!
I'm still happy w my BMW and decided to keep an e46 m3 for the long term but I am glad I "discovered" the real talents of an AMG!
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10' C63, 99' 4Runner 250K miles!
My take on that, is that if all that matters to you is track times then go for the BMW, if you want the best car for driving on the street go for the C63. I bought a C63 because I drive on roads, not tracks. If my primary concern was for track times I would by a race car, not a street legal sedan.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63 & Mustang Mach1(s)
I really don't get it, who cares about a track comparo between STOCK cars and making that your ultimate benchmark. If your going to track your car, it will most likely be modded. to some extent. Mods will be in the range of better tires, (an equalizer) and in the case of the C63 it will be tuned to uncork the power taken away at the factory, there are not similar gains in a tuned M3. Short of adding FI to the M, the C63 will best an M3 on the track in the Real world with the increased power thats just a tweak away. Just saying that mods which keep either car well within the orignal design limits of the car, I think we'd see different results accross the board.
How about the magazines start comparing cars of owners?
How about the magazines start comparing cars of owners?
#7
I drove the C63 w/ P31, E63 and SL63 today on the course at El Toro Airfield. It's like I told the AMG guys...for handling: M3 "10," C63 "9," for power M3 "10," C63 "12." WINNER: C63. IMHO.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
I presume the M3 was fitted with the competition package which includes PS Cup tires. They are a game changer all by them selves and the C63 would have no chance on a road course with stock rubber. However a set of R888's levels the table quite a bit and KW v3s would really up the ante.
MB really hasn't shown any interest in matching the M3's track prowess as they seem to be catering to a slightly different clientele. But it would be nice to have a factory C63 with more influence from the CLK BS rather than the E class.
MB really hasn't shown any interest in matching the M3's track prowess as they seem to be catering to a slightly different clientele. But it would be nice to have a factory C63 with more influence from the CLK BS rather than the E class.
#9
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Westchester, New York
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09 C63
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
I finally got my Automobile magazine and read the article today. That was really just filler material. Must have been a really slow month in the creative ideas department.
#11
I went to El toro event too yesterday and it really show me how little i've been pushing my c63. Out of e,c and sl63 I still pick c63 any day. It really made me a proud owner of an amazing car. Thanks AMG.
#13
Super Member
I don't live in an area with all that much car enthusiasm other than muscle cars and don't really hit the "twisties" very much or the track at all. So... I was just wondering if some of you could help me out with a question that has been bothering me for some time now. M3 always wins the track test and BMW owners always argue to take it to the twisties and see who wins.
My question is this - Are there really that many people that can handle these cars to their full tracking potential? Drag racing is easy and the C63 is the obvious winner. Just seems like people want to race the track or the twisties because they read in a magazine that their car is faster but can the owner actually drive it to the limit? It just seems that both of these cars would highly out perform MY driving ability anyway.
My question is this - Are there really that many people that can handle these cars to their full tracking potential? Drag racing is easy and the C63 is the obvious winner. Just seems like people want to race the track or the twisties because they read in a magazine that their car is faster but can the owner actually drive it to the limit? It just seems that both of these cars would highly out perform MY driving ability anyway.
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2021 Taycan Turbo, 2018 Radical SR3, 2021 Lincoln Aviator
I really don't get it, who cares about a track comparo between STOCK cars and making that your ultimate benchmark. If your going to track your car, it will most likely be modded. to some extent. Mods will be in the range of better tires, (an equalizer) and in the case of the C63 it will be tuned to uncork the power taken away at the factory, there are not similar gains in a tuned M3. Short of adding FI to the M, the C63 will best an M3 on the track in the Real world with the increased power thats just a tweak away. Just saying that mods which keep either car well within the orignal design limits of the car, I think we'd see different results accross the board.
How about the magazines start comparing cars of owners?
How about the magazines start comparing cars of owners?
#16
My question is this - Are there really that many people that can handle these cars to their full tracking potential? Drag racing is easy and the C63 is the obvious winner. Just seems like people want to race the track or the twisties because they read in a magazine that their car is faster but can the owner actually drive it to the limit? It just seems that both of these cars would highly out perform MY driving ability anyway.
Although considering both drivers are evenly skilled, the M3 probably will still have the advantage on the twisties. But if both drivers have not visited the track at all, or have done only a few events then i would argue that the c63 has the advantage.
#17
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
98 E430 & 06 C230
food for thought?
seeing how the crowd here obviously prefers the c63 over m3
, i can't help but ask what is deficient in a m3 on a normal road surface that makes it not as good as a c63?
both cars have similar pricing, they both can have similar options and modding capability seems similar as well so the question is how does one decide upon these two great cars? i will be taking the plunge soon and have been in the debate for a time myself. I'm debating between the c63 and the 4 door m3 fyi...
thoughts?
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
both cars have similar pricing, they both can have similar options and modding capability seems similar as well so the question is how does one decide upon these two great cars? i will be taking the plunge soon and have been in the debate for a time myself. I'm debating between the c63 and the 4 door m3 fyi...
thoughts?
#18
Super Member
seeing how the crowd here obviously prefers the c63 over m3
, i can't help but ask what is deficient in a m3 on a normal road surface that makes it not as good as a c63?
both cars have similar pricing, they both can have similar options and modding capability seems similar as well so the question is how does one decide upon these two great cars? i will be taking the plunge soon and have been in the debate for a time myself. I'm debating between the c63 and the 4 door m3 fyi...
thoughts?
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
both cars have similar pricing, they both can have similar options and modding capability seems similar as well so the question is how does one decide upon these two great cars? i will be taking the plunge soon and have been in the debate for a time myself. I'm debating between the c63 and the 4 door m3 fyi...
thoughts?
Then you jump on the C63 and the slowness of the tranny is depressing as well. But at least for me torque > shift speed. That's why I drive a C63.
As far as handling there is only a minority of drivers that can push either cars to their limit. That being said this should be a non factor in your decision making. The M3 does have more electronic gadgets. Styling and interior looks are all subjective. Both are awesome cars but they have different strengths and weakness.
#19
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
98 E430 & 06 C230
Drive both cars and the absence of torque on the M3 is depressing. It makes me think of an expensive s2000. Great steering response but it needs high rpms to be actually fun.
Then you jump on the C63 and the slowness of the tranny is depressing as well. But at least for me torque > shift speed. That's why I drive a C63.
As far as handling there is only a minority of drivers that can push either cars to their limit. That being said this should be a non factor in your decision making. The M3 does have more electronic gadgets. Styling and interior looks are all subjective. Both are awesome cars but they have different strengths and weakness.
Then you jump on the C63 and the slowness of the tranny is depressing as well. But at least for me torque > shift speed. That's why I drive a C63.
As far as handling there is only a minority of drivers that can push either cars to their limit. That being said this should be a non factor in your decision making. The M3 does have more electronic gadgets. Styling and interior looks are all subjective. Both are awesome cars but they have different strengths and weakness.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!