C63 with Oe-tuning 1/4 times
Edit: I forgot to add, it was probably due to driver error.
Last edited by SonnyakaPig; Nov 24, 2010 at 02:57 PM.

You take the term excuses to a whole new level
I've noticed some E63's can cut 1.7's on stock tires, definitely 1.8's. So, what's the deal? Why can't tuned C63's do the same thing?

Do you have a tune?
And pray tell,how fast is it?Please...u have NO idea how fast it is
If its not a 1/4mi run what is it?
You never replied as to why you got your buddy w the 850rwhp vette involved,can you answer that please as Im confused?
And while were at it,is oldgixxers babyseat modded car the "new" factory freak,as officially ordained by you since it no longer applies to your car? AWESOME! I'll have to pass the word on...woohoo!!

Do you have a tune?
I do have Hankook EVO V12 265's on the back. And I would not recommend them to anyone. They suck big time. I hate them.
They are the cause of my wheelhop issues.
But, even on the stock P0's which allowed me to floor the throttle from a standstill with the biggest consequence being the feeling of ice skating all over the pavement (NO WHEELHOP) sorry, I'm just mad I don't have the stock rubber anymore... I still cannot brake stall my car over 1500 rpms, even 1200 to be completely candid, or else it will bog.
And pray tell,how fast is it?Please...u have NO idea how fast it is
If its not a 1/4mi run what is it?
You never replied as to why you got your buddy w the 850rwhp vette involved,can you answer that please as Im confused?
And while were at it,is oldgixxers babyseat modded car the "new" factory freak,as officially ordained by you since it no longer applies to your car? AWESOME! I'll have to pass the word on...woohoo!!
I've read auto reviewers say that even though the C63 has a lot of spunk and with the P31 package it's even faster than a regular C63, if you can afford it, the extra power available in the E63 can noticably be felt.
But, I do understand that tuned C63's can beat stock E63's in a drag race. Of course, it's a drivers race.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I've read auto reviewers say that even though the C63 has a lot of spunk and with the P31 package it's even faster than a regular C63, if you can afford it, the extra power available in the E63 can noticably be felt.
But, I do understand that tuned C63's can beat stock E63's in a drag race. Of course, it's a drivers race.
I've read auto reviewers say that even though the C63 has a lot of spunk and with the P31 package it's even faster than a regular C63, if you can afford it, the extra power available in the E63 can noticably be felt.
But, I do understand that tuned C63's can beat stock E63's in a drag race. Of course, it's a drivers race.
I'm more interested in the fact that the larger E63's on street tires can cut better 60' times than the tune-only C63's on street tires.
It could be that the answer lies in the mysterious TCU.
But I still managed a 1.9- 2.0 60ft.
My first outing with the car on the Hankooks, I got a 1.903 60' and for sure, without question, I could have been in the 1.8's because my car actually hooked great on that run (no spin) but I didn't expect that to happen so I didn't engage enough throttle until it was too late. I'm sure that cost me at least 1/100th of a second.
I had another run that was 1.977 and I experienced some slight wheel hop on that run and some tire spin. It was a horrible run.
I didn't know this about the front and rear bumpers. Very exciting. Anything to bring the weight down is a good thing.

The E63 rear tires are 265.... in my opinion, this won't help the "heavier" and "slower" E63 much - especially going against the super factory freak driven by Jon
Last edited by MB_Forever; Nov 24, 2010 at 04:32 PM.
The primary reason is the adjustable suspension which they set to the softest setting and raise the ride hight as high as possible. This allows the car to squat when the rear wheels hook with no power lost to wheel hop or spin. This additional flex which has the same impact as running very low pressure in the rear tires allows for smoother weight transfer to the rear upon acceleration and keeps the contact point pinned to the ground as the tire is torqued into motion.
The primary reason is the adjustable suspension which they set to the softest setting and raise the ride hight as high as possible. This allows the car to squat when the rear wheels hook with no power lost to wheel hop or spin. This additional flex which has the same impact as running very low pressure in the rear tires allows for smoother weight transfer to the rear upon acceleration and keeps the contact point pinned to the ground as the tire is torqued into motion.
And we've got one more excuse.... now it's the tires

The E63 rear tires are 265.... in my opinion, this won't help the "heavier" and "slower" E63 much - especially going against the super factory freak driven by Jon

Last edited by MB_Forever; Nov 24, 2010 at 05:07 PM.
The primary reason is the adjustable suspension which they set to the softest setting and raise the ride hight as high as possible. This allows the car to squat when the rear wheels hook with no power lost to wheel hop or spin. This additional flex which has the same impact as running very low pressure in the rear tires allows for smoother weight transfer to the rear upon acceleration and keeps the contact point pinned to the ground as the tire is torqued into motion.
By the way, when I see Juicee's sig, I marvel at the 60' time. Just amazing.
The 55's I always thought could have an advantage in 60' times because they have extra rwhp and tq. It's true they have more low end power and have the potential to spin the tires more than 63's, but I would think if you can get good and repeatable with the throttle modulation technique, you could ease into the throttle and then click it to the floor when traction is available, and the extra power should compensate for the less aggressive launch.
I know this is just speculation. Perhaps, it is solely due to the suspension, like you said.



I ran in 64F thats 24F difference. Like I said I did bog. Maybe its the tune or my driving.