What's the real reason why C63 tires wear so fast?
And I drive like an ******* who just escaped from prison and is being chased by the police...
That leads me to believe, that while I am sure there are many factors as has been mentioned, but road surface and the type of roads (highway vs city streets) plays a really big part in tire wear.
I drive around 48 miles each direction every day...




I also reverse commute, I live in Alexandria, but work in Stafford. I only managed 7200 out of my PZeros. I also had a few trips up to NJ, and one trip to Pittsburgh on them.
And to be honest, I babied those tires. I went with Yokohamas, an All-Season tire. I have to admit, they do not have the performance of the PZeros, but are great in the rian, and light-median snow. They have thin side walls and tend to flex with cornering forces. But the best benefit is the wear, and the fact that I will not be replacing these every six months.
I also reverse commute, I live in Alexandria, but work in Stafford. I only managed 7200 out of my PZeros. I also had a few trips up to NJ, and one trip to Pittsburgh on them.
And to be honest, I babied those tires. I went with Yokohamas, an All-Season tire. I have to admit, they do not have the performance of the PZeros, but are great in the rian, and light-median snow. They have thin side walls and tend to flex with cornering forces. But the best benefit is the wear, and the fact that I will not be replacing these every six months.

I got 6K out of my Pzero's. I hear people getting 12K plus out of all season tires (Jon). Jon drives his car hard so hes getting 12K with hard driving.

The "Problem" isnt the car or its configuration. Its the tire and its soft compound along with geography. Northeast cold temps with salty roads cause tire compounds to break down even quicker. That along with a terrible treadwear rating of the Pzero gives us the exact results I would expect out of a extreme performance tire.
This is what I meant by the engineering of the car.
Can anyone confirm that it is only the C that has that characteristic?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Pzeros across most car models with same HP/TQ of the C63 see the same result. 6-8K miles. If the extreme toe in was the problem you would see equal tread life on other brand tires. Simply replacing the Pzero with another brand adds tread life.
I think this is being WAY over thought.
In addition to this, after I put even 4000 miles on the tires, they absolutely blow in the rain. All of them. I thought it was just the V12's that had the effect (it seems it is more pronounced on the hankooks) but my tail end will not stay straight when I drive through water when they are worn in like that (I would assume just under 40-50% tread life at that point. I think it has to do with the alignment of the rear wheels.
The other 63 cars do not have that kind of tire life. I know a few people with E63, SL63, SL65, CL63 and they get at least 20K miles and some get 30K.
I still think that Palladin may have the answer. I will go to the dealer and ask them the toe in settings of the other 63 cars.

Why buy a performance car and drive it like an old lady? All I do is hard launches. Some burnouts of course leaving the line. No melts. 6K max.
What do you do? Drive in C and shift up to 3rd every time and never get on it? I cant imagine getting 12K out of the Pzero's.
I actually just got 5,000 miles on a set of 1/2 used rear P0's.
I would love to do standing hard launches, but I dont' have an LSD, so it's actually kind of dangerous because the car isn't very predictable when it's starts fishtailing.
And again, because I don't have an LSD, I can't exit corners very hard because the power isn't being put down like I would want. So, I have to stall the power delivery until the car plants a little more.
It's pretty lame actually, but it can all be solved with an LSD, down the road.
I will test out what he said, I will have my shop change the alignment on my rear wheels this weekend. Gonna go ahead and purchase the lifetime alignment plan at the shop that way when I do take it to the track, I can change the toe back and alignment specs back to what is ideal for aggressive driving.

The "Problem" isnt the car or its configuration. Its the tire and its soft compound along with geography. Northeast cold temps with salty roads cause tire compounds to break down even quicker. That along with a terrible treadwear rating of the Pzero gives us the exact results I would expect out of a extreme performance tire.
I actually just got 5,000 miles on a set of 1/2 used rear P0's.
I would love to do standing hard launches, but I dont' have an LSD, so it's actually kind of dangerous because the car isn't very predictable when it's starts fishtailing.
And again, because I don't have an LSD, I can't exit corners very hard because the power isn't being put down like I would want. So, I have to stall the power delivery until the car plants a little more.
It's pretty lame actually, but it can all be solved with an LSD, down the road.
I think this is being WAY over thought.
I have the original PZEROs Asyms on my Mustang and they have a 140 treawear. The car makes more hp/trg and I drive it WAY harder. The tires have 4300 miles on them and have over half the tread left. My Cont DW have 1100 miles and they have a 340 treadwear and they have half the tread left.
So this isn't about "treadwear or soft tires".I know people with Maserati's and Panamera's that come with the exact same PZEROs (Although they are 20") and they are getting apprx 10-12k miles on their Rears.
I am telling you this isn't normal for our cars to get such short tread life.

I have the original PZEROs Asyms on my Mustang and they have a 140 treawear. The car makes more hp/trg and I drive it WAY harder. The tires have 4300 miles on them and have over half the tread left. My Cont DW have 1100 miles and they have a 340 treadwear and they have half the tread left.
So this isn't about "treadwear or soft tires".I know people with Maserati's and Panamera's that come with the exact same PZEROs (Although they are 20") and they are getting apprx 10-12k miles on their Rears.
I am telling you this isn't normal for our cars to get such short tread life.
The C63 is a fun car but I won't miss this particular issue.
Alignment issues create tell tale wear patterns, like scuffing and wear bands around tires. I can tell you that all my tire replacements, stock or not have had a pretty even wear at the time of replacement.
I really want some owners who do 80+% mid to high speed freeway driving to chime in please.
Of course most of you blame the high horsepower and tons of torque. IMO that doesn't make much sense. I have a Mustang with more power and the rear tires last at least 10K with lots of hard launches.
My C has 1200 miles and the rear tires have maybe 4/32s left on the inner edge. I am running 295/25R20 Cont DW. The cars been lowered in the front with HnRs and the rear has the thinnest OEM spring pads. I'm gonna have the alignment checked but regardless the outer edge might have 5 or 6/32s. So lets say it wore evenly across, that means I'd get maybe 2500 to 3000 miles on them. I drive the stang way harder than the C so what gives?
The high power theory just doesn't make much sense. There are plenty of cars out there with similar or more power but I'll bet you they get way more than 5K out of the rears.
So is it alignment, suspension geometry, or whatelse?



This thread isn't to complain about our crappy tire wear. I really want to see what some of you might think it is besides power.
Thanks!
I have the original PZEROs Asyms on my Mustang and they have a 140 treawear. The car makes more hp/trg and I drive it WAY harder. The tires have 4300 miles on them and have over half the tread left. My Cont DW have 1100 miles and they have a 340 treadwear and they have half the tread left.
So this isn't about "treadwear or soft tires".I know people with Maserati's and Panamera's that come with the exact same PZEROs (Although they are 20") and they are getting apprx 10-12k miles on their Rears.
I am telling you this isn't normal for our cars to get such short tread life.
I'm guessing you also have a live rear axel under the Stang. When you step on it the entire axel moves up under the car, but the tire alignment stays relatively consistant. When you step on an IRS the wheels arch upward and inward creating more negative camber and hence more wear on the inside edge.
It is normal for a C63 to get poor rear tire wear due to;
1.IRS wear inner edges faster on any car.
2.Suspension geometry set up for rear tires that are too narrow.
(Hello MBZ punch out the rear wells and get some 305/315 on the back of this beast).
3.Lots of TQ from a dead stop that you don't even notice that partially spin very expensive grippy tires every time you take off even without punching it.



