Tuned C63 vs 2012 CLS63
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Video claims cams and there are no cams for the C63, at least none that make more power.
Also says it has the bigger throttle bodies and that loses bottom end also. No headers?? Not a fair evaluation of a C63 with a tune and mods.
The CLS63 is a monster though!! I love the way it looks and runs!! Gotta get me one!
Also says it has the bigger throttle bodies and that loses bottom end also. No headers?? Not a fair evaluation of a C63 with a tune and mods.
The CLS63 is a monster though!! I love the way it looks and runs!! Gotta get me one!
#27
The c63 is probaly making 430whp, but this c63 is not tuned right it's loosing mad power @200km. If they start @ 100km the c63 would be in a better power band then 50km which is where torque wins.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
I have no doubt that the CLS 63 on that video is much quicker than the C63 but there are a few things that makes me raise the BS flag like:
Cams on the C63? from whom?
the other thing is about trap speeds, anyone in the USA with LTH and a decent tune traps 120mph plus and that alone should equal that CLS trap speeds if the CLS is stock.
Bigger Throtle bodies don't really do that much in performance, the stock Throtle bodies aren't even maximized yet(they are plenty big already for the flow). Just my .2c, not trying to argue but the facts aren't there.
Cams on the C63? from whom?
the other thing is about trap speeds, anyone in the USA with LTH and a decent tune traps 120mph plus and that alone should equal that CLS trap speeds if the CLS is stock.
Bigger Throtle bodies don't really do that much in performance, the stock Throtle bodies aren't even maximized yet(they are plenty big already for the flow). Just my .2c, not trying to argue but the facts aren't there.
#32
I have no doubt that the CLS 63 on that video is much quicker than the C63 but there are a few things that makes me raise the BS flag like:
Cams on the C63? from whom?
the other thing is about trap speeds, anyone in the USA with LTH and a decent tune traps 120mph plus and that alone should equal that CLS trap speeds if the CLS is stock.
Bigger Throtle bodies don't really do that much in performance, the stock Throtle bodies aren't even maximized yet(they are plenty big already for the flow). Just my .2c, not trying to argue but the facts aren't there.
Cams on the C63? from whom?
the other thing is about trap speeds, anyone in the USA with LTH and a decent tune traps 120mph plus and that alone should equal that CLS trap speeds if the CLS is stock.
Bigger Throtle bodies don't really do that much in performance, the stock Throtle bodies aren't even maximized yet(they are plenty big already for the flow). Just my .2c, not trying to argue but the facts aren't there.
Take it easy not all world tuners log on mbworld!
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Well I am sure you might think BS and maybe everything is just made up but time will tell you when more videos show up on YouTube and other media sites that this car is Fast honestly I own faster cars than the CLS63 I could run against my fully modded GT2 997 and it will not make any sense cuz you don't know how sick fast my Porsche is and you won't get the feel! But I chose to try it with my Friend's C63 and his car is tuned and no you can buy cams Wimmer could be your source here try this article http://www.worldcarfans.com/11103293...g-by-wimmer-rs
Take it easy not all world tuners log on mbworld!
Take it easy not all world tuners log on mbworld!
incidentally did you run your CLS vs. your C bullit
would be cool for comparisons
Last edited by Zod; 08-14-2011 at 08:13 AM.
#35
Regards
#37
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Corona, Ca
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
c63
Just priced one fully loaded with CCB is $130k + some dealer mark up I am doing the same thing you are !