C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bias of course but still a good read

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-16-2011, 05:48 PM
  #1  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
Bias of course but still a good read

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...&highlight=evo
Old 09-16-2011, 05:59 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,510
Received 432 Likes on 355 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Already posted.

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...oss-302-a.html
Old 09-16-2011, 06:55 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Lol notice no tire smoke on the M3.
No torque =
Old 09-19-2011, 10:27 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
PetroleumGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10' C63, 99' 4Runner 250K miles!
Check out which car is quickest to 100, 110, 120, but not the 1/4

Notice that except for a tie with the M3, the C63 beats the other cars in the 0 to 100 MPH, 0 to 110 MPH, and 0 to 120 MPH, but came in third in the quarter mile. It looks to me like the C63 was cheated on it's 1/4 mile time.
Old 09-19-2011, 11:10 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jae Duk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palos Verdes
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'09 C63
Agreed...how is C63's 0-60 time the slowest? They really don't know how to test cars.
Old 09-20-2011, 07:47 AM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
hhughes1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2013 Chevy 427 Torch Red
They stated that the M3 0-60 time was a fluke and the typical launch took nearly half a second longer. These tests should use 5 attempts and throw out the high and the low to yield real world numbers.
Old 09-20-2011, 08:45 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
IAA-C63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'11 C63, '22 GLS 63, Porsches, M3, M4
Originally Posted by hhughes1
They stated that the M3 0-60 time was a fluke and the typical launch took nearly half a second longer. These tests should use 5 attempts and throw out the high and the low to yield real world numbers.
Agreed, good idea.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Bias of course but still a good read



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM.