c63 coupe vs cts-v coupe
I agree largely with the banter here. The C is the better looking car, and has better build quality judging by the sheer number of people with rattley, noisey V's. If you're going to mod however, you can make the V an absolute ROCKET. There are Sedans out there running 9's.
I agree largely with the banter here. The C is the better looking car, and has better build quality judging by the sheer number of people with rattley, noisey V's. If you're going to mod however, you can make the V an absolute ROCKET. There are Sedans out there running 9's.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Watch the video!!
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/cadill...-9-8-139-7-mph
Last edited by melmanc55; Oct 7, 2011 at 09:54 AM.
It's just that we are probably open minded and actually personally try different cars to form our own opinion.
Personally, I'm on here because I really like the C63 and I'm a car enthusiast.
If Hyundai made a 600hp sedan and runs sub 8 minutes on the 'Ring, hell yeah, I would consider getting it.
It's not an inferiority complex as you suggest.
Considering the ZL-1, F10 M5, E63, and maybe even the C63 BS for my next car.
How's that for diversity...
C63 has presence and prestige on the road. Don't care how fast the cts is but the coupe is just hidious, wtf were GM designers smoking?

I just find it absolutely pathetic when some people say **** like "well ones the benz, and the other is just a cadillac" like the brand makes much if any difference. Its not like some entry level C-class is full of so much prestige. Both cadillac and mercedes are well respected brands...focus on the bloody car, not the brand.
oh god...presence and prestige? Do you really drive around thinking "man my car has presence and prestige." Its a c-class, there is little prestige or presence.
It's just that we are probably open minded and actually personally try different cars to form our own opinion.
Personally, I'm on here because I really like the C63 and I'm a car enthusiast.
If Hyundai made a 600hp sedan and runs sub 8 minutes on the 'Ring, hell yeah, I would consider getting it.
It's not an inferiority complex as you suggest.
Considering the ZL-1, F10 M5, E63, and maybe even the C63 BS for my next car.
How's that for diversity...
Watch the video!!
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/cadill...-9-8-139-7-mph

That said, there's a negative to every positive. Even without the NO2 in the car, I wouldn't want to pulley down that far to get the LSA to make that much power at the rear wheels.
For people that live in a hot climate, the under hood temps would prove inconvenient. LT's + over spinning top mount blower = high heat. That's the cost, but it's still an awesome build.
Seems like you have your own feelings on the "entry level car" WE drive...
Really?....then go to a Cadillac forum if you are so so f*****G interested in them.. This is a Mercedes forum. There is plenty of info on on CTSV vs C63 on these forums. People like you love to stir the pot on that ugly car.

my god you really do cry a lot. If you can't handle even the most minor dissension, you may want to get off the internet.
I went from an M3 to E63 to CTS-V and I have no regrets.... But I am eyeballing a BS C63 Coupe (dont tell my wife)

That said, there's a negative to every positive. Even without the NO2 in the car, I wouldn't want to pulley down that far to get the LSA to make that much power at the rear wheels.
For people that live in a hot climate, the under hood temps would prove inconvenient. LT's + over spinning top mount blower = high heat. That's the cost, but it's still an awesome build.
NOS is not my personal cup of tea, but anytime you drop below 10 seconds in a 4300lb sedan...







