C63 BS. Need Help
in light of that....im very happy with my purchase.
i could turn my c63 coupe into a black series for less than half that. or you can just wait tell its resale value plummets like the clk63 bs did and nab one for 80k.

Also, FWIW, the C63 BS comes loaded with everything the C63 Coupe can option out, at 110-115k (The $125k figure was out the door with tax). To compare a C63 Coupe, with the performance and premium packages, it works out to $80k. That would make the difference 30-35k.
Pretty unrealistic to expect a Black Series to come in at $10k over a loaded C63 Coupe, considering the # of changes between the 2 cars.
It's not that money is no object, in fact it is the oposite, we all have choices.
I choose not to eat so I can put gas in my cars

BS is exclusive, but that is a pretty penny.
All AMGs lose 50% of their value in the first 2 years according to the lease residual i am told.
The E63 rapes a C63 P31/APX, and most likely a C63 BS. Pretty awesome car if straight line speed is a high priority.

The C63's felt slow compared to the E63 and CLS63. The difference might be closer at sea level, but at our elevation here (3700ft), the turbo motor puts down at least 100hp more than the normally aspirated C63. To put things in perspective, I ran some 100-200 runs with my CLK BS (stock), my C63 AMG (chipped 500hp), and a buddy's C63 P31 (480hp) in early summer. The 3 cars were dead even. When I picked up a 996TT Tiptronic (stock 420hp), it walked my C63. Turbos rule up here in the mountains!
Last edited by rage2; Oct 25, 2011 at 11:11 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The turbo motors will be wild especially when the aftermarket gets ahold of them. I'm sure the next gen C AMG will get the 5.5. For now I'd say enjoy the NA 6.3 while you can! I'd way prefer a BS to a big car like an E or a CLS.
To compare this car with a barge like the E63 is pointless. Like arguing that a Panamera Turbo is better than a GT3 because its faster in a straight line...
Last edited by Black Pete; Oct 25, 2011 at 03:03 PM.
To compare this car with a barge like the E63 is pointless. Like arguing that a Panamera Turbo is better than a GT3 because its faster in a straight line...
BTW .... the "BEST" handling Mercedes ever, is the current F1 car. The "BEST" handling Mercedes ever (road legal), is a CLK GTR.
BTW .... the "BEST" handling Mercedes ever, is the current F1 car. The "BEST" handling Mercedes ever (road legal), is a CLK GTR.
I will take issue though with the SLS. Transmission is the same. Too many ponies for the chassis in my experience. If traction in the E is a dead loss, the SLS is even worse. Thats why the GT3 is so good - right balance and drivetrain for the chassis. You can have too much of a good thing. Lets see...
Last edited by Black Pete; Oct 25, 2011 at 05:27 PM.
Yea, I've been making a lot of comparisons to the CLK BS, mainly because I haven't driven the C63 BS, but I'm assuming it's identical to the CLK BS but with a better transmission.
I ran 305's on my CLK BS, and had zero wheelspin off the line. With a good launch on the C63 which gets tons of wheelspin in 1st, it was close, so wheelspin just makes it a little harder. The E63's were traction limited all the way to 3rd gear down the strip, didn't matter, was still a lot faster.
I will take issue though with the SLS. Transmission is the same. Too many ponies for the chassis in my experience. If traction in the E is a dead loss, the SLS is even worse. Thats why the GT3 is so good - right balance and drivetrain for the chassis. You can have too much of a good thing. Lets see...
Proper drivers car that goes round corners+ KW coilovers++
Special enough to match or exceed my GT3. NA engine response key...
4 seats to accommodate Dad's weekend taxi requirements
I will take issue though with the SLS. Transmission is the same. Too many ponies for the chassis in my experience. If traction in the E is a dead loss, the SLS is even worse. Thats why the GT3 is so good - right balance and drivetrain for the chassis. You can have too much of a good thing. Lets see...
. I take it you've never driven an SLS?

Edit: What options did you go with?
Last edited by Agent_Oorange; Oct 25, 2011 at 11:13 PM. Reason: ...
Typically speaking, delivery for Canada happens 12-16 weeks after the build date (when the whole process starts at the factory). All depends on parts supplies, shipping schedules, etc.
In terms of options, I went with B25 (diff cooling + tires), and 752 Matte Black wheels.
Last edited by rage2; Oct 26, 2011 at 01:37 PM.
It's all a matter of perspective. To me, I would not have paid the original $140k for the CLK63 Black Series, but for $85k its a bargain. On the other hand, I think $200 for a reasonably optioned new SLS is perfectly acceptable.
You've come to the right place for confirmation bias if that's what you're looking for, but ultimately you have to do what I have done on many occasions. Try to make the decision in a vacuum of opinion and decide if my heart or my head is winning the argument. In all seriousness, there is no logical/rational argument for cars like the C63 Black, only emotion.
Last edited by Carac; Oct 26, 2011 at 02:29 PM.
Typically speaking, delivery for Canada happens 12-16 weeks after the build date (when the whole process starts at the factory). All depends on parts supplies, shipping schedules, etc.
In terms of options, I went with B25 (diff cooling + tires), and 752 Matte Black wheels.

Obsidian black, black wheels, B25, rear seat delete.

The C63's felt slow compared to the E63 and CLS63. The difference might be closer at sea level, but at our elevation here (3700ft), the turbo motor puts down at least 100hp more than the normally aspirated C63. To put things in perspective, I ran some 100-200 runs with my CLK BS (stock), my C63 AMG (chipped 500hp), and a buddy's C63 P31 (480hp) in early summer. The 3 cars were dead even. When I picked up a 996TT Tiptronic (stock 420hp), it walked my C63. Turbos rule up here in the mountains!
Do the same test at 1200 meters in the Pyrenees.





