5.5 BiTurbo is reportedly for C63 in MY2013
But a base E63 for 89k vs an optioned out (my personal options) C63 for 83k? Guess it depends on what you are looking for.
Every option there is with premium paint is 127K for the E63.
44K difference.
If you think they had to shoehorn a 6.2, what do you think they did when they had 6 header tubes on each side
Merecedes/AMG/Brabus engineers have proven they can do whatever they want...that's why they can build the best suite of performance cars in the world....without limits
There is no 5.5 TT in the C Class because they want a clear delineation when it comes to performance. You stuff the 5.5TT in the entry level AMG C class and it will walk on the E/CLS/CL/S Class AMG's all day and that does not make sense from a pricing perspective.
If you want big power you have to step up to the E/CLS/CL/S



When you drive a $175K S63...they want you to take pride in knowing that you have something better/more than the guy that just pulled up beside you in his $70K C63....
When you drive a $175K S63...they want you to take pride in knowing that you have something better/more than the guy that just pulled up beside you in his $70K C63....
I think they really figured no one would be able to crack their ECU. ooops...
Next people will ask when the V12 will be available in the C class next.
I can't believe Bi-Xenon headlights are an option on this car.
ive been following this thread and really, im not worried about it. the 5.5tt is probably a tuners dream and it gets a little better gas mileage but who can complain about the current 6.2. im completely happy with what i have now and even if the new c63 comes with the 5.5tt i will not be upgrading because of that.
man, 20 years ago a car with 300 hp, 0-60 in 5+ and 1/4 miles in 13+ was everything we could ever ask for. now we have 500 horsepower monsters and it just isnt enough lol.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
When you drive a $175K S63...they want you to take pride in knowing that you have something better/more than the guy that just pulled up beside you in his $70K C63....
If you think they had to shoehorn a 6.2, what do you think they did when they had 6 header tubes on each side
Merecedes/AMG/Brabus engineers have proven they can do whatever they want...that's why they can build the best suite of performance cars in the world....without limits
There is no 5.5 TT in the C Class because they want a clear delineation when it comes to performance. You stuff the 5.5TT in the entry level AMG C class and it will walk on the E/CLS/CL/S Class AMG's all day and that does not make sense from a pricing perspective.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ture-c55s.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ming-guys.html
If the C63 is getting the 5.5TT, it'll be in a W205 in late 2015 (MY2016)
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ture-c55s.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...ming-guys.html
If the C63 is getting the 5.5TT, it'll be in a W205 in late 2015 (MY2016)
Scroll down to ----> A naturally aspirated 6.2-litre V8 vs a twin-turbo 5.5-litre V8 – 19 July 2011
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/...m-test-review/




I'm happy with my 6.2L NA beast.
I agree with this statement, I mean MB stuffed straight 8s in 190Es back in the day, it could be done but never went in production.







