C63 AMG vs. CTS-V
As with many threads, it degenerates into a penile size comparison.
What in the world does this post have to do with the question posed by the OP?
Did anyone ask about a "crossfire"?
Last night I cut three 11.0s and finally let the car cool down and ran my personal best -- by far -- 10.75 @ 127.85.
Your car is awesome, but there are a lot of fast V's out there, and it doesn't take much to get them into the low 11s/10s.
I love the Thunder Gray.... that was my first choice instead of Raven Black. At the time I couldn't find one with black interior, Recaro seats and Alcantara trim. But I guess I would have gotten the GT-R in Black if I had went with the Thunder Gray on the CTS-V.

Tom
Last night I cut three 11.0s and finally let the car cool down and ran my personal best -- by far -- 10.75 @ 127.85.
Your car is awesome, but there are a lot of fast V's out there, and it doesn't take much to get them into the low 11s/10s.

Last night I cut three 11.0s and finally let the car cool down and ran my personal best -- by far -- 10.75 @ 127.85.
Your car is awesome, but there are a lot of fast V's out there, and it doesn't take much to get them into the low 11s/10s.

Last edited by amx1397; Dec 29, 2011 at 10:02 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
had (and still do) an opportunity to purchase a 2009 e63. 90k for $23k fully loaded minus lsd and suede steering wheel. just got completely serviced under warrantee. still has 90k nonetheless. ultimately..i looked at it as a potential money pit.
had (and still do) an opportunity to purchase a 2009 e63. 90k for $23k fully loaded minus lsd and suede steering wheel. just got completely serviced under warrantee. still has 90k nonetheless. ultimately..i looked at it as a potential money pit.

Have a 2012 CTSV

Looking to get back into a 2013 P31 C63....my C63 was faster than my CTSV (automatic)...C63 did 9.72s 60-130 while the CTSV could on muster a 9.88s 60-130...Cadi is much bigger and more comfortable with a great ride but the Merc has MUCH better fit and finish and is more "classy".
Peter
Put a pulley on that thing and it's game over. I had a 2010 C63 and it was a great car, I had so much fun with it but after only 7 months with the Caddy I feel it's a better overall car.
I just spent 4K in parts and labor to run 10.87 @ 127. MBH headers alone for my C63 were over 4K.
Last edited by PetroC63; Mar 27, 2013 at 12:33 PM.
Peter

I have to disagree on the fit & finish comment tho. Other than the front seats (which were admittedly gorgeous), I was NOT impressed with the interior of my C63. Felt very "C class" to me.
Personally, I think my CTS-V interior both looks and "feels" more befitting of a $60K sedan. And my passengers are definitely more comfortable.








