C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mercedes-Benz Turbo vs The Competition.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-26-2012, 05:35 PM
  #1  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 1,390
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Cars.
Mercedes-Benz Turbo vs The Competition.

I know MB has experience with turbo's and superchargers. What I would like to know is how they compare to the competition, such as Audi, BMW, Jag etc etc. How's the turbo lag compared to the competition? How about how well the engine pulls in the mid to high RPM's? Is there excessive carbon build-up?(Audi's have/had this problem) Would love some insight!
Old 01-26-2012, 07:12 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Montana/Alberta
Posts: 1,669
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
C63 BS, GLA45
Too new to tell how reliable they are. I drove the new E63 and CLS63, and there was zero lag, even at 3400ft elevation where turbo lag is always an issue with turbo cars.
Old 01-27-2012, 04:36 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
justthebest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'09 SL Black, '12 ML63, '13 SL63, '14 E63 Wagon, '14 458 Italia
I think MB's experience with turbos has paid off. There's very little lag on my CLS, and the mid-to-high RPM pulls are amazing. If you haven't been in an AMG with the new 5.5 BiTurbo, then go find someone / some dealer that has one and give it a shot.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mercedes-Benz Turbo vs The Competition.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.