Dyno Numbers
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Which stck C63 are we talking about? C63 p31 with the dual clutch, or a p31 C63 with the MCT or a non-PP C63 with dual clutch
Look at what I wrote:
A stock SL63 dyno about 380-390rwhp. Now a stock C63 with dual clutch and non PP would dyno a little less 350-360. However, the same C63 with a P31 would dyno more than both.
That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.
The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question
Look at what I wrote:
That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.
The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question
Last edited by jacob502; Apr 13, 2012 at 07:56 AM.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Look I found this, this is a stock P31 C63 with the MCT:
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-1-4-mile.html
430 RWHP. I hope the OP sees this
by the way. It is SAE corrected :-)
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-1-4-mile.html
430 RWHP. I hope the OP sees this
by the way. It is SAE corrected :-)
Last edited by jacob502; Apr 13, 2012 at 07:59 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 62
From: eNyCe
Steel Grey Metallic C63!!
Which stck C63 are we talking about? C63 p31 with the dual clutch, or a p31 C63 with the MCT or a non-PP C63 with dual clutch
Look at what I wrote:
A stock SL63 dyno about 380-390rwhp. Now a stock C63 with dual clutch and non PP would dyno a little less 350-360. However, the same C63 with a P31 would dyno more than both.
That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.
The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question
Look at what I wrote:
A stock SL63 dyno about 380-390rwhp. Now a stock C63 with dual clutch and non PP would dyno a little less 350-360. However, the same C63 with a P31 would dyno more than both.
That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.
The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question
There is no such thing as a C63 with DCT. C63's only came in 7 speed auto or MCT.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 42
C63 AMG
I find it hard to believe the MCT is less efficient than a 7spd. The 7 Spd has a torque converter and tranny clutches, while the MCT has no torque converter and just clutches...
A torque converter in my mind would eat up more power then the MCT...
Any dyno evidence?
A torque converter in my mind would eat up more power then the MCT...
Any dyno evidence?
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Banned
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: UAE
C63
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Clearly you have no understanding of what you are talking about. I will be more than happy to take the time and provide you with some proof.
Here is a C63 from Evosport recieving a TUNE ONLY:
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/mercedes-amg/146501-evosport-powerchip-stage-1-c63-ecu-tune-development.html
this is the normal detuned C63, it made 370rwhp at stock form. Afterwards it made 430rwhp
Here is an SL63 also from Evosprt. this SL had a tune+headers+ Xpipe:
https://mbworld.org/forums/sl55-amg-sl63-amg-sl65-amg-r230/337791-evosport-sl63-long-tube-header-thread.html
you can clearly see it made 380 at stck form and 437 rwhp after the mods, thats only +7 hp from the tune only C63
The MCT transmission will result in more drivetrain loss than the normal 7G tronic but with better shifting
you can contact Simon from evosport, Richard from dynocomp and even Andy from MHP and they will agree with what I told you.
Last edited by jacob502; Apr 13, 2012 at 04:14 PM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 42
C63 AMG
So headers and x pipe gained 7 hp over just a tune soley because of the MCT? That is a huge loss.
Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??
So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?
I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??
Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??
So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?
I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
So headers and x pipe gained 7 hp over just a tune soley because of the MCT? That is a huge loss.
Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??
So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?
I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??
Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??
So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?
I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??
I did not claim a %8-9. Please take the time to read exactly what I am trying to tell you. I gave you an example of a same tune for the C63 and SL63 with the SL being modded a little more.
The same modded two cars betweem an SL63(MCT) and a C63 (Gtronic) the C63 will be making more. I dont care if you believe it or not.
The Evosport SL63 is not a basis, just an example. Dont forget My SL63 made 465rwhp.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 832
Likes: 3
From: Melbourne
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
So what you're saying is that if you've got an engine with those sorts of numbers, & you treat it with at least a little bit of respect, then the transmission is not going to be cause for concern....JUST ASKING...that's all!
Cheers, Pickles.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
G'Day from Aus.....Mate, you seem to know your cars.......but geez, 1000HP, & 1000NM??.....Mate....they are BIG numbers...VERY big.
So what you're saying is that if you've got an engine with those sorts of numbers, & you treat it with at least a little bit of respect, then the transmission is not going to be cause for concern....JUST ASKING...that's all!
Cheers, Pickles.
So what you're saying is that if you've got an engine with those sorts of numbers, & you treat it with at least a little bit of respect, then the transmission is not going to be cause for concern....JUST ASKING...that's all!
Cheers, Pickles.
So far, we have not seen an M156 or M157 making those numbers yet, but the MCT transmission will handle those numbers.
Do you know which transmission is used on the new Brabus Rocket and Buillt, which are rated @ 800HP and 1400NM??
The AMG MCT 7speed speedshift..
http://www.supercars.net/cars/5634.html
Yes, its a powerful transmission that even brabus layed down the powerful 5-speed auto for the MCT
Last edited by jacob502; Apr 14, 2012 at 05:07 AM.
Super Member
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 832
Likes: 3
From: Melbourne
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
No worries.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
Banned
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 1
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
No worries.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
