C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno Numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-13-2012, 07:34 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by vessproms
So stock vs stock SL63 makes less rwhp then c63?
Which stck C63 are we talking about? C63 p31 with the dual clutch, or a p31 C63 with the MCT or a non-PP C63 with dual clutch


Look at what I wrote:
Originally Posted by jacob502
The SL63's are known to dyno less than C63's runing with the same crank number due the MCT transmission wet clutch sucking up more horsepower.

The drivetrain loss on the MCT is more than that of a dual clutch at about %5-6
The SL63 US spec is rated @ 518 HP.
A stock SL63 dyno about 380-390rwhp. Now a stock C63 with dual clutch and non PP would dyno a little less 350-360. However, the same C63 with a P31 would dyno more than both.

That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.

The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question

Last edited by jacob502; 04-13-2012 at 07:56 AM.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:55 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Look I found this, this is a stock P31 C63 with the MCT:

https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-amg-w...-1-4-mile.html

430 RWHP. I hope the OP sees this

by the way. It is SAE corrected :-)

Last edited by jacob502; 04-13-2012 at 07:59 AM.
Old 04-13-2012, 09:22 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
I am Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: eNyCe
Posts: 2,286
Received 61 Likes on 52 Posts
Steel Grey Metallic C63!!
Originally Posted by jacob502
Which stck C63 are we talking about? C63 p31 with the dual clutch, or a p31 C63 with the MCT or a non-PP C63 with dual clutch


Look at what I wrote:


A stock SL63 dyno about 380-390rwhp. Now a stock C63 with dual clutch and non PP would dyno a little less 350-360. However, the same C63 with a P31 would dyno more than both.

That said. I want to see what a stock C63 p31 with an MCT dyno at? I am guessing 420rwhp, since it is tuned from the factory.

The MCT is a more powerful transmission. It shifts quicker than the dual cutch, thats why it sucks up more horsepower. I hope that answers your question

There is no such thing as a C63 with DCT. C63's only came in 7 speed auto or MCT.
Old 04-13-2012, 09:28 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by I am Jeff
There is no such thing as a C63 with DCT. C63's only came in 7 speed auto or MCT.

Your right, my bad!

My comparison comes between the normal 7speed auto that was privded in the previous M156 C63's and the new MCT that was first introduced in the SL63
Old 04-13-2012, 12:00 PM
  #30  
Member
 
vessproms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
so how many rwhp does a p31 c63 with 7 speed makes?
Old 04-13-2012, 01:11 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
I find it hard to believe the MCT is less efficient than a 7spd. The 7 Spd has a torque converter and tranny clutches, while the MCT has no torque converter and just clutches...

A torque converter in my mind would eat up more power then the MCT...

Any dyno evidence?
Old 04-13-2012, 01:17 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
I am Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: eNyCe
Posts: 2,286
Received 61 Likes on 52 Posts
Steel Grey Metallic C63!!
Originally Posted by vessproms
so how many rwhp does a p31 c63 with 7 speed makes?
The OP's dyno results is what is typical of a P31 c63.
Old 04-13-2012, 01:23 PM
  #33  
Administrator

 
Vic55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes on 495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Run the car on the street with another C63---- I love street dynos cause they tell the truth.
Old 04-13-2012, 03:27 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Vic55
Run the car on the street with another C63---- I love street dynos cause they tell the truth.
I wouldnt mind runing the OP with my own 2008 C63. Hes from Kuwait and I'm from Qatar. We can both meet half way in Khobar, Saudia Arabia. I'll even post videos.
Old 04-13-2012, 03:46 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Sirex63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UAE
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63
Originally Posted by jacob502
I wouldnt mind runing the OP with my own 2008 C63. Hes from Kuwait and I'm from Qatar. We can both meet half way in Khobar, Saudia Arabia. I'll even post videos.
That's the most clever way to figure out if the OP has a real tune or a BS one
Old 04-13-2012, 04:11 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
I find it hard to believe the MCT is less efficient than a 7spd. The 7 Spd has a torque converter and tranny clutches, while the MCT has no torque converter and just clutches...

A torque converter in my mind would eat up more power then the MCT...

Any dyno evidence?


Clearly you have no understanding of what you are talking about. I will be more than happy to take the time and provide you with some proof.

Here is a C63 from Evosport recieving a TUNE ONLY:

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/mercedes-amg/146501-evosport-powerchip-stage-1-c63-ecu-tune-development.html


this is the normal detuned C63, it made 370rwhp at stock form. Afterwards it made 430rwhp




Here is an SL63 also from Evosprt. this SL had a tune+headers+ Xpipe:
https://mbworld.org/forums/sl55-amg-sl63-amg-sl65-amg-r230/337791-evosport-sl63-long-tube-header-thread.html


you can clearly see it made 380 at stck form and 437 rwhp after the mods, thats only +7 hp from the tune only C63

The MCT transmission will result in more drivetrain loss than the normal 7G tronic but with better shifting

you can contact Simon from evosport, Richard from dynocomp and even Andy from MHP and they will agree with what I told you.

Last edited by jacob502; 04-13-2012 at 04:14 PM.
Old 04-13-2012, 07:50 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
So headers and x pipe gained 7 hp over just a tune soley because of the MCT? That is a huge loss.

Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??

So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?

I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??
Old 04-13-2012, 09:24 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
crazy1eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Montreal Quebec
Posts: 396
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
2016 C63S, 2012 ML350
FWIW, a stock 2011 E63(MCT) made 10whp less than my stock 2010 C63 P31(7G) on the same dyno on the same day.

Last edited by crazy1eye; 04-13-2012 at 10:21 PM.
Old 04-13-2012, 09:30 PM
  #39  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Does 2010 have 7G or MCT??
Old 04-13-2012, 11:19 PM
  #40  
Super Member
 
Pickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
Smile

Originally Posted by Merc63
Does 2010 have 7G or MCT??
7G.
Cheers, Pickles.
Old 04-14-2012, 02:03 AM
  #41  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
So headers and x pipe gained 7 hp over just a tune soley because of the MCT? That is a huge loss.

Most guys with tune headers are sitting around 465-470rwhp.. So the MCT is soaking up 35-40rwhp??

So your claiming the MCT is good for a loss of roughly 8-9% extra drivetrain loss compared to the 7G?

I don't think this is right. Why would they come out with a new tranny that is hugely inefficient compared to an older model just to shift faster?? What's the point of the faster shifts if your losing 8% rwhp??

I did not claim a %8-9. Please take the time to read exactly what I am trying to tell you. I gave you an example of a same tune for the C63 and SL63 with the SL being modded a little more.

The same modded two cars betweem an SL63(MCT) and a C63 (Gtronic) the C63 will be making more. I dont care if you believe it or not.

The Evosport SL63 is not a basis, just an example. Dont forget My SL63 made 465rwhp.
Old 04-14-2012, 02:06 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by crazy1eye
FWIW, a stock 2011 E63(MCT) made 10whp less than my stock 2010 C63 P31(7G) on the same dyno on the same day.
I expect this.

thanks for notifying this for us.


BTW, the MCT is rated @ 1000HP and 1000NM. It is a more powerful transmission than the 7G.
Old 04-14-2012, 03:44 AM
  #43  
Super Member
 
Pickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
Question

Originally Posted by jacob502
I expect this.

thanks for notifying this for us.


BTW, the MCT is rated @ 1000HP and 1000NM. It is a more powerful transmission than the 7G.
G'Day from Aus.....Mate, you seem to know your cars.......but geez, 1000HP, & 1000NM??.....Mate....they are BIG numbers...VERY big.
So what you're saying is that if you've got an engine with those sorts of numbers, & you treat it with at least a little bit of respect, then the transmission is not going to be cause for concern....JUST ASKING...that's all!
Cheers, Pickles.
Old 04-14-2012, 04:28 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Pickles
G'Day from Aus.....Mate, you seem to know your cars.......but geez, 1000HP, & 1000NM??.....Mate....they are BIG numbers...VERY big.
So what you're saying is that if you've got an engine with those sorts of numbers, & you treat it with at least a little bit of respect, then the transmission is not going to be cause for concern....JUST ASKING...that's all!
Cheers, Pickles.
Pickles..good day to you too.

So far, we have not seen an M156 or M157 making those numbers yet, but the MCT transmission will handle those numbers.

Do you know which transmission is used on the new Brabus Rocket and Buillt, which are rated @ 800HP and 1400NM??

The AMG MCT 7speed speedshift..

http://www.supercars.net/cars/5634.html


Yes, its a powerful transmission that even brabus layed down the powerful 5-speed auto for the MCT

Last edited by jacob502; 04-14-2012 at 05:07 AM.
Old 04-14-2012, 04:59 AM
  #45  
Super Member
 
Pickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
Thumbs up

No worries.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
Old 04-14-2012, 05:21 AM
  #46  
Banned
 
jacob502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2008 C63 ,2009 SL 63 AMG, 2011 SLS AMG
Originally Posted by Pickles
No worries.
Yes, I am aware of that Brabus car, but not that it had the MCT transmission.
Was that transmission modified at all?.....if it wasn't, then for sure, we've got a strong transmission.
It's just hard to imagine the standard transmission handling the sort of forces that would be put on a full throttle gear change....with 1000NM pounding away in there!
Cheers, Pickles.
They upgraded the clutch packs. thats it. thats because the car is making more torque than 1000NM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Dyno Numbers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.