Contisportcontact 5P (2013 OEM) vs. Michelin PSS
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Contisportcontact 5P (2013 OEM) vs. Michelin PSS
Can anyone offer a comparison btwn these tires?
The contis came on my 2013 c63 sedan and they seem like good tires but I have nothing to compare them to so I really have no way of knowing how good they are...
Everyone speaks so highly of the PSS and how much of a difference is noticed when swithing from the Pirelli P Zeros.
I'm just wondering if I should be expecting just as big of an improvement if I get the PSS?
The contis came on my 2013 c63 sedan and they seem like good tires but I have nothing to compare them to so I really have no way of knowing how good they are...
Everyone speaks so highly of the PSS and how much of a difference is noticed when swithing from the Pirelli P Zeros.
I'm just wondering if I should be expecting just as big of an improvement if I get the PSS?
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,853
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes
on
8 Posts
SLS Irridium silver,2014 GL350 BT Irridium, 2015 White Dodge RAM Hemi Quad
I know that the AMG Driving Academy in canada swear by the Conti 5p. I also have them on my SLS and am impressed with the wear. I had PZero on the C63 and I went through a few sets, seemingly quicker than the SportConti 5p.
#5
Senior Member
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
While this link does not compare the Conti5p tires to the Pilot SS it does offer some insight into the Pilots compared with similar tires.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=162
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...y.jsp?ttid=162
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
I just opted to get a new set of 5P's put on while at the dealership getting an oil change. By the time the rears wear out, the fronts should be just about done and I'll replace all 4 together. The OEM 5P's lasted about 9000 miles.
I've been really happy with the 5P's thus far....verrrrrry curious about the PSS', but unlike the 09's Pirelli's (which were awful) these 5P's have been good, I didn't hesitate much to get them again.
I've been really happy with the 5P's thus far....verrrrrry curious about the PSS', but unlike the 09's Pirelli's (which were awful) these 5P's have been good, I didn't hesitate much to get them again.
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
3 Posts
507 SEDAN
I say burn up and THEN switch to the PSS.
Main reason: cannot beat the PSS warranty and you might squeeze a "little" more life out of the PSS. If getting close to the end of PSS warranty, drive like a bat out of hell, and replace the PSS with the warranty provided.
Both are exceptional tires. Warranty wins!!
Main reason: cannot beat the PSS warranty and you might squeeze a "little" more life out of the PSS. If getting close to the end of PSS warranty, drive like a bat out of hell, and replace the PSS with the warranty provided.
Both are exceptional tires. Warranty wins!!
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: D.c
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2009 Barolo red C63 AMG (SOLD).13' P31 c63 coupe 2012 porsche panamera
Just switched from conti5's to PSS a week ago. Theyre both great tires. I burnt through my contis in 6000 miles, but i do push my car really hard, always do 0-60's at lights. Look wise, the pss are much beefier. Price wise, PSS is more expensive, but as others stated, warranty helps. Grip, both good around corners. From a dig, i feel like the PSS grips more at lower temps then the conti's do. But from what i recall, theres this one exit where my conti's wouldn't make the ESP engage at 60MPH, while the PSS do.
#10
#11
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Moscow
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63AMG PP
Just switched from conti5's to PSS a week ago. Theyre both great tires. I burnt through my contis in 6000 miles, but i do push my car really hard, always do 0-60's at lights. Look wise, the pss are much beefier. Price wise, PSS is more expensive, but as others stated, warranty helps. Grip, both good around corners. From a dig, i feel like the PSS grips more at lower temps then the conti's do. But from what i recall, theres this one exit where my conti's wouldn't make the ESP engage at 60MPH, while the PSS do.
#13
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Moscow
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63AMG PP
#14
Senior Member
I have been very impressed with the wear of the Contis. Got ~12000km (non track days, mostly non stop start driving) out of the rears (which to be honest was probably past the legal limit on tread wear) and the original fronts are nearing their limit now too at 20000km.
I had several sets of PSS on an M3 and thought this was a good tyre, felt no reason to change from these while I owned it. Having now experienced the Conti 5P - and I appreciate I am comparing different cars here - I dont think the improvement in the dynamics of the PSS tire (handling/noise/grip) are big enough to: (1) notice by the average daily driver C63 owner and (2) justify what looks like no better (and possibly worse) wear with the PSS and for me here in Australia about a 15% increase in cost compared to the 5P.
I had several sets of PSS on an M3 and thought this was a good tyre, felt no reason to change from these while I owned it. Having now experienced the Conti 5P - and I appreciate I am comparing different cars here - I dont think the improvement in the dynamics of the PSS tire (handling/noise/grip) are big enough to: (1) notice by the average daily driver C63 owner and (2) justify what looks like no better (and possibly worse) wear with the PSS and for me here in Australia about a 15% increase in cost compared to the 5P.
#17
#18
A simple burnout and PSS are better than any other 'true street tire'. There is no contest.
I honestly have believed they are so poor dead cold, to improve tire wear... but that's just a guess.
Peace,
Dave
I honestly have believed they are so poor dead cold, to improve tire wear... but that's just a guess.
Peace,
Dave
#20
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
I burned through the stock Contis in 7500kms... PSS lasted 16000kms+! The performance limit of the PSS were higher IMO, and they were better in the wet too!
#22
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Moscow
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63AMG PP
#23
MBWorld Fanatic!
They were great on the highway! Very comfortable up over 280km/h. In the city they were great too. Plenty of grip. I loved the PSS wayyy more than the contis. I have tried kumhos and they were better than the contis at a much better price. I am interested in trying something much more sticky next year -but am worried about tread wear.
#24
#25
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Moscow
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C63AMG PP
They were great on the highway! Very comfortable up over 280km/h. In the city they were great too. Plenty of grip. I loved the PSS wayyy more than the contis. I have tried kumhos and they were better than the contis at a much better price. I am interested in trying something much more sticky next year -but am worried about tread wear.
PSS is good on small bumps?