Any Hand Gun Enthusiasts / Collectors Among Us?
shot placement is the key
a miss with a 45 is the same as a miss with a 9
a hit in the Com with either will do the same
people have been hit with shotgun, 223 and 308 and survive
that is why you have more than 1 bullet and can deliver them in < 1/2 sec
been training with police and military since 1978, my first GI sidearm was a 1911A1
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
2 cm will not make a difference 9 vs 45
actually a HV 9 will deliver more 'shock' than a 45
it will expand much more violently
again, no one shot twice CoM with a goo 9 mm will 'enjoy' it
most people can't master the manual of arms for a SA 45 (owner frequently shoot themselves or others by accident)
my gun is idiot proof
squeeze, pull trigger
pull trigger then squeeze
both at the same time
bang!!!
instinctive pointing
I've been thru at least 5 job related schools and 4 private (Gunsite) for defensive/offensive sidearms, many instructors use the 9
in fact JMB's last design was the HiPower, an improvement on the 45
people who focus on caliber are missing the point, the hardware is <10% of a gunfight, give me a Ranger with a 22 > a self proclaimed expert with a bazooka any day, lol
2 cm will not make a difference 9 vs 45
actually a HV 9 will deliver more 'shock' than a 45
it will expand much more violently
again, no one shot twice CoM with a goo 9 mm will 'enjoy' it
I served, I know, and the guys I worked with preferred the gun they had
with a 9 you can carry more ammo, it is universally available, and for all intent and purpose will stop a man the same
there is no real cost difference, and depending on load, recoil is the same, it is more sharp in a 9 since the gun is lighter
if you look at any study, theoretical or statistical, hatcher, marshall, etc.
it's the shooter, not the gun
failure to stop, 45 vs 9, the same

1 shot stops, the same, as long as the ammo is optimized

most of the caliber stuff is armchair commando crap
the 40 may be the best, but differences are so small, again, a veeeery small part of the whole system
http://www.chuckhawks.com/handgun_power_chart.htm
standard SeAL sidearm, Sig 226 9 mm, they could have ANY sidearm they desired
Last edited by Ingenieur; Oct 24, 2013 at 09:54 PM.
The human body and the body of a deer work, for the most part, exactly the same. Having said that, a lung shot from a 223 or small caliber weapon has led many camo/orange suited men on miles of travel in the search of specs of blood. Whereas a lung shot from a 44magnum with far more knock down power will drop a dear in its tracks! There is no question that a blow from a larger caliper weapon is more deadly. I know all of this first hand with real world experience in dozens of cases.
More lead, more mushroom, larger area of destruction, creates quicker, if not immediate bleed outs if the slug isn't a direct kill shot.
For these reasons, I discredit almost everything you say.
Last edited by Autosport7; Oct 24, 2013 at 11:37 PM.
I served, I know, and the guys I worked with preferred the gun they had
with a 9 you can carry more ammo, it is universally available, and for all intent and purpose will stop a man the same
there is no real cost difference, and depending on load, recoil is the same, it is more sharp in a 9 since the gun is lighter
if you look at any study, theoretical or statistical, hatcher, marshall, etc.
it's the shooter, not the gun
failure to stop, 45 vs 9, the same

1 shot stops, the same, as long as the ammo is optimized

most of the caliber stuff is armchair commando crap
the 40 may be the best, but differences are so small, again, a veeeery small part of the whole system
http://www.chuckhawks.com/handgun_power_chart.htm
standard SeAL sidearm, Sig 226 9 mm, they could have ANY sidearm they desired

Last edited by quadexhaust; Oct 25, 2013 at 05:45 PM.
although the body of a man and deer may be similar (mass aside) their minds are not...a man will know what happened to him when shot, a deer will not, a deer will flee, a man may stand and fight to live
I have hunted since I was 12 years old, lived in the bush in AK for 10 years and took: moose, elk, bear (brown) and a few others...
if you believe a 44 mag has more stopping power than a 223 HP logic will not work with you...keep drinking that kool-aid you are espousing
those 'graphs and charts' are based on shooting gotas and actual emergency room and police records, not some internet guy saying a 44 will do more damage thana 223 for criminy sakes, lol
are you a coroner? a forensic patholigist? work for the Army doing wound damage assessments? your ancedotal hogwash is just that..by your logic a 38 short will do more damage than a 223 since it is a bigger diameter and will 'mushroom' larger
just because you discredit what I say does not make it wrong, it implies you do not understand
The human body and the body of a deer work, for the most part, exactly the same. Having said that, a lung shot from a 223 or small caliber weapon has led many camo/orange suited men on miles of travel in the search of specs of blood. Whereas a lung shot from a 44magnum with far more knock down power will drop a dear in its tracks! There is no question that a blow from a larger caliper weapon is more deadly. I know all of this first hand with real world experience in dozens of cases.
More lead, more mushroom, larger area of destruction, creates quicker, if not immediate bleed outs if the slug isn't a direct kill shot.
For these reasons, I discredit almost everything you say.








