Need some advice got a Ticket
they are trained and tested and usually accurate +/5 mph or better
COLUMBUS, Ohio – A simple educated guess that a motorist is speeding is all the evidence a police officer needs to write an ironclad speeding ticket, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.
In a 5-to-1 ruling, the court said an officer's "unaided visual estimation of a vehicle's speed" is strong enough to support a ticket and conviction. A radar speed detector, commonly used by patrolmen, is not needed, the court concluded.
"Independent verification of the vehicle's speed is not necessary to support a conviction for speeding," assuming the officer has been trained and certified by the Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy or similar organization, Justice Maureen O'Connor wrote for the court's majority.
it's a simple technique and they are always doing it when sitting at an intersection
it's SOP in CA
many states require the estimate along with the electronic measurement as a check
very difficult to beat since you can't contest the reading of a device: calibration, training, method, etc.
his word against yours and why would he lie? make it up? if you contend he did it out of spite and it was not valid you are accusing him of a crime and questioning his character...the courts frown upon this
your record won't help your case
basically all you can ask is how he did it, was he trained (and passed a test and certified), and is certification current
you can ask him what he used for benchmarks for the distance and what was your time and make sure it is ~65 mph (60 mph = 88 ft/sec)
get a lawyer and he may be able to plea it down to a no point violation
Last edited by Ingenieur; Dec 6, 2013 at 06:08 PM.
at least according to the Ohio Supreme Court (and numerous other states including Cali)
get a lawyer, especially considering the consequences if you get the full penalty...he can help you minimize the damage
The Best of Mercedes & AMG


