If you compare the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG Edition 507 coupe with the Audi RS 5 solely on the basis of name length, the Mercedes wins by a mile. If you compare both cars in their totality, things become more complicated. You may like the C63 more than the RS 5, but does it beat the […]
More on the blog.
Senior Member
It's easier to view when you copy those things to this thread.
I only think that the RS5's front looks a little more aggressive than the C63's but overall I like the look of the C63 way better.
Senior Member
Would be nice if the 507 had more aggressive tire sizes. 235 front 255 rear no wonder it can only pull .91g in the skid pad and a weak figure 8 time.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
and the c63's ***** rear fender lol. the M3s and RS5 have wide body I dont know why we dont get it Originally Posted by papashango
I only think that the RS5's front looks a little more aggressive than the C63's but overall I like the look of the C63 way better.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Another must watch video.
Member
Thanks for the vids! 
IMO, I like the looks of the C63 much better than the RS5. The RS5 just looks too bulbous.
If it were not for the AWD, I think the RS5 would not have approached the performance levels of the C63.
If I had to pick only one car, and if climate/road hazard conditions was an issue, then the RS5 would probably be my first choice. The RS5 offers phenominal performance when you consider the much smaller displacement/lack of torque, vis-a-vis the C63.
Cheers/BB
IMO, I like the looks of the C63 much better than the RS5. The RS5 just looks too bulbous.
If it were not for the AWD, I think the RS5 would not have approached the performance levels of the C63.
If I had to pick only one car, and if climate/road hazard conditions was an issue, then the RS5 would probably be my first choice. The RS5 offers phenominal performance when you consider the much smaller displacement/lack of torque, vis-a-vis the C63.
Cheers/BB
