Oil confusion...
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
The ESP formula is a worse oil in terms of lubrication and engine protection properties than either the 5W40 Formula M or the 0W40. It is however more environmentally friendly and works with their diesel engines, which is why MB is pushing it across their entire range.
The 0W40 has the best cold and hot viscosity, VI, TBN and anti-wear additive package from the three. However, it does break down faster than the other two so you have to change it more often.
I guess what it comes down to is whether you're willing to spend the extra $$ to have better engine protection at the expense of changing (and toping up) the oil more often. As for the AMG-recommended switch to the 5W40 from the 0W40 mentioned earlier, it has nothing to do with the oil draining from the tappets - it is because of the oil burn-off rate at engine startup when the engine is cold.
The 0W40 has the best cold and hot viscosity, VI, TBN and anti-wear additive package from the three. However, it does break down faster than the other two so you have to change it more often.
I guess what it comes down to is whether you're willing to spend the extra $$ to have better engine protection at the expense of changing (and toping up) the oil more often. As for the AMG-recommended switch to the 5W40 from the 0W40 mentioned earlier, it has nothing to do with the oil draining from the tappets - it is because of the oil burn-off rate at engine startup when the engine is cold.
Last edited by Diabolis; 03-03-2014 at 02:36 PM.
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
11 Posts
2007 E63 w/P30 and Eurotech CF Diffuser
No, don't do that. Mobil specifically says not to. The wear inhibitors are far higher and will trash your catalytic converter. Which is why MB went from 0W-40 to 5W-40 ESP.
I personally stay with the 0W-40. It is what the AMG Academy uses.
I personally stay with the 0W-40. It is what the AMG Academy uses.
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
11 Posts
2007 E63 w/P30 and Eurotech CF Diffuser
Mobil 1 0W-40 European Car Formula (Data Sheet)
Mobil 1 Formula M 5W-40 (Data Sheet)
Mobil 1 ESP Formula M 5W-40 (Data Sheet)
Mobil 1 Formula M 5W-40 (Data Sheet)
Mobil 1 ESP Formula M 5W-40 (Data Sheet)
As I mentioned in my previous post, don't use mobil1 racing oil because "Mobil 1 Racing oils offer boosted levels of anti-wear protection (nominal zinc level of 1850 ppm) for extra engine protection in highly loaded flat tappet engine designs." and "Mobil 1 Racing oils are not recommended for everyday general street use where vehicles use catalytic exhaust converters."
So lets look at the zinc levels which are good for flat tappet design, like the M156.
from this document http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
0W-40 European Car Formula has 1000 phosphorus and 1100 zinc
5W-40 ESP has 800 phosphorus and 900 zinc
And that lady and gents is why I and the ADA use 0W-40.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
I can say from personal experience, i use 5W-40 ESP in E63/ML63/C63 with no problems at all.
General street driving.
And this stuff cant be bought here in Australia, can only get from Dealer. (Rip off)
Its actually cheaper for me to bring it in from ECS Tuning + pay Fedex 2 day shipping.
I wouldnt use anything else.
Weird, when looking at the log books from previous owner of C63, Benz dealer used Shell 0-40. ?? Anyway, when i changed to Mobile ESP 5w40, engine sounded ALOT quieter.
General street driving.
And this stuff cant be bought here in Australia, can only get from Dealer. (Rip off)
Its actually cheaper for me to bring it in from ECS Tuning + pay Fedex 2 day shipping.
I wouldnt use anything else.
Weird, when looking at the log books from previous owner of C63, Benz dealer used Shell 0-40. ?? Anyway, when i changed to Mobile ESP 5w40, engine sounded ALOT quieter.
#31
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
But these do not tell the whole story.
As I mentioned in my previous post, don't use mobil1 racing oil because "Mobil 1 Racing oils offer boosted levels of anti-wear protection (nominal zinc level of 1850 ppm) for extra engine protection in highly loaded flat tappet engine designs." and "Mobil 1 Racing oils are not recommended for everyday general street use where vehicles use catalytic exhaust converters."
So lets look at the zinc levels which are good for flat tappet design, like the M156.
from this document http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
0W-40 European Car Formula has 1000 phosphorus and 1100 zinc
5W-40 ESP has 800 phosphorus and 900 zinc
And that lady and gents is why I and the ADA use 0W-40.
As I mentioned in my previous post, don't use mobil1 racing oil because "Mobil 1 Racing oils offer boosted levels of anti-wear protection (nominal zinc level of 1850 ppm) for extra engine protection in highly loaded flat tappet engine designs." and "Mobil 1 Racing oils are not recommended for everyday general street use where vehicles use catalytic exhaust converters."
So lets look at the zinc levels which are good for flat tappet design, like the M156.
from this document http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
0W-40 European Car Formula has 1000 phosphorus and 1100 zinc
5W-40 ESP has 800 phosphorus and 900 zinc
And that lady and gents is why I and the ADA use 0W-40.
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
But these do not tell the whole story.
As I mentioned in my previous post, don't use mobil1 racing oil because "Mobil 1 Racing oils offer boosted levels of anti-wear protection (nominal zinc level of 1850 ppm) for extra engine protection in highly loaded flat tappet engine designs." and "Mobil 1 Racing oils are not recommended for everyday general street use where vehicles use catalytic exhaust converters."
So lets look at the zinc levels which are good for flat tappet design, like the M156.
from this document http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
0W-40 European Car Formula has 1000 phosphorus and 1100 zinc
5W-40 ESP has 800 phosphorus and 900 zinc
And that lady and gents is why I and the ADA use 0W-40.
As I mentioned in my previous post, don't use mobil1 racing oil because "Mobil 1 Racing oils offer boosted levels of anti-wear protection (nominal zinc level of 1850 ppm) for extra engine protection in highly loaded flat tappet engine designs." and "Mobil 1 Racing oils are not recommended for everyday general street use where vehicles use catalytic exhaust converters."
So lets look at the zinc levels which are good for flat tappet design, like the M156.
from this document http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf
0W-40 European Car Formula has 1000 phosphorus and 1100 zinc
5W-40 ESP has 800 phosphorus and 900 zinc
And that lady and gents is why I and the ADA use 0W-40.
Isn't it a tradeoff? Increased phosphorus/zinc can result in higher consumption?
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
Whenever read about this topic everyone seems to have their own opinion. High phosphorus/zinc requirements for old engines or for break in. Where "800/900" seems to be the average for "normal" use.
Isn't it a tradeoff? Increased phosphorus/zinc can result in higher consumption?
Isn't it a tradeoff? Increased phosphorus/zinc can result in higher consumption?
No. The oil consumption is a result of the viscosity, not of the additive package. When the oil is cold, 0W40 is thinner than 5W40, which is why the consumption is higher.
The 5W40 Formula M (both ESP and non-ESP) oils that MB is now using are more environmentally friendly than the 0W40, but do NOT provide better engine protection or lubrication than the 0W40.
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
Contrary to what a number of people here believe, the MB 229.51 is NOT an updated or newer-spec to the 229.5 oil specification. The 229.51 is an update over the older 229.31 specification. 229.5 is an update over the older 229.3 spec. Unlike software revisions, these are not incremental updates (as in 229.51 is an update over 229.5). They are completely different specifications.
229.5 is still the CURRENT SPEC for the M156 motor, although MB is now also starting to push the more environmentally-friendly 229.51 oils - which unfortunately don't protect the engine as well.
229.51 is a LOW-ASH spec that has to be used with the MB diesel engines with the fine particulate filters. Ash is an additive used to control the acidity of the oil. Oil becomes acidic over time, and the ash is used to neutralize it. Yes, it does result in more harmful emissions out of your tailpipe, but it does protect the engine better.
THE LATEST BEVO SHEET INDICATING WHICH ENGINE OIL IS TO BE USED IN WHAT ENGINE IS THE 223.2 (January 2014). IT STILL CLEARLY STATES THAT THE ONLY FACTORY APROVED OIL SPEC FOR THE M156 MOTORS WORLD-WIDE IS 229.5, NOT 229.51. It is available at the Bevo site at http://bevo.mercedes-benz.com/downlo...Spec_223_2.pdf.
Although it is somewhat irrelevant for the purposes of this particular discussion, yes, the AMG Driving Academy only uses the Mobil1 0W40 oil in the cars that get beat up around various race tracks. So does Porsche in all of their current models.
229.5 is still the CURRENT SPEC for the M156 motor, although MB is now also starting to push the more environmentally-friendly 229.51 oils - which unfortunately don't protect the engine as well.
229.51 is a LOW-ASH spec that has to be used with the MB diesel engines with the fine particulate filters. Ash is an additive used to control the acidity of the oil. Oil becomes acidic over time, and the ash is used to neutralize it. Yes, it does result in more harmful emissions out of your tailpipe, but it does protect the engine better.
THE LATEST BEVO SHEET INDICATING WHICH ENGINE OIL IS TO BE USED IN WHAT ENGINE IS THE 223.2 (January 2014). IT STILL CLEARLY STATES THAT THE ONLY FACTORY APROVED OIL SPEC FOR THE M156 MOTORS WORLD-WIDE IS 229.5, NOT 229.51. It is available at the Bevo site at http://bevo.mercedes-benz.com/downlo...Spec_223_2.pdf.
Although it is somewhat irrelevant for the purposes of this particular discussion, yes, the AMG Driving Academy only uses the Mobil1 0W40 oil in the cars that get beat up around various race tracks. So does Porsche in all of their current models.
Last edited by Diabolis; 03-05-2014 at 02:42 PM.
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
Goes back to my point about most people just having their own opinion without any solid proof.
I think the whole idea of the 5W-40 ESP version being better over the non ESP 5W-40 is because of its increased viscosity.
Also, a 5W-40 will take longer to break down than a 0W-40 when introduced to the extreme heat the M156 can generate.
Either way, there's better oils out there than the Mobil products which have been proven by many oil analysis done over on bitog.
Last edited by Jasonoff; 03-05-2014 at 03:05 PM.
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
This I do agree with. I am merely commenting on the differences between the Mobil1 0W40 / 5W40 M / 5W40 M ESP.
Last edited by Diabolis; 03-05-2014 at 03:18 PM.
#37
THE LATEST BEVO SHEET INDICATING WHICH ENGINE OIL IS TO BE USED IN WHAT ENGINE IS THE 223.2 (January 2014). IT STILL CLEARLY STATES THAT THE ONLY FACTORY APROVED OIL SPEC FOR THE M156 MOTORS WORLD-WIDE IS 229.5, NOT 229.51. It is available at the Bevo site at http://bevo.mercedes-benz.com/downlo...Spec_223_2.pdf.
with the note 2) which says it must be 0W40 or 5W40
the one with a dot under 229.5 says EXCEPT M156
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
For WESTERN EUROPE ONLY. The WORLDWIDE EXCEPT WESTERN EUROPE chart is below and only shows 229.5.
P.S. Which, BTW, has to do with the composition of the gasoline, not the engines themselves. Western Europe has much cleaner gas than the crap that comes out of our pumps.
Last edited by Diabolis; 03-05-2014 at 03:50 PM.
#39
MBWorld Fanatic!
If you have 2 engines side by side on a test dyno. One with 0W40 and the other with 5W40. The operating temp (100C) viscosity after x hours would be lower on the 0W40. I remember even seeing proof of this on bitog from a few different race teams.
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
<snip>
From what I have heard (from race engine builders / experienced tuners) and read. When oil breaks down in an engine the operating viscosity moves toward the "cold" viscosity rating.
If you have 2 engines side by side on a test dyno. One with 0W40 and the other with 5W40. The operating temp (100C) viscosity after x hours would be lower on the 0W40. I remember even seeing proof of this on bitog from a few different race teams.
From what I have heard (from race engine builders / experienced tuners) and read. When oil breaks down in an engine the operating viscosity moves toward the "cold" viscosity rating.
If you have 2 engines side by side on a test dyno. One with 0W40 and the other with 5W40. The operating temp (100C) viscosity after x hours would be lower on the 0W40. I remember even seeing proof of this on bitog from a few different race teams.
As for the actual specs of the oils we're talking about, this is from their respective spec sheets:
Mobil1 0W40:
Viscosity, cSt (ASTM D445)
@ 40ºC 75
@ 100ºC 13.5
Viscosity Index 185
MRV at -40ºC, cP (ASTM D4684) 31,000
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC, (ASTM D4683) 3.8
Total Base Number (ASTM D2896) 11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874) 1.3
Phosphorous, wt% (ASTM D4981) 0.1
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 230
Density @15.6 ºC, g/ml (ASTM D4052) 0.85
Mobil1 5W40 Formula M:
SAE Grade 5W-40
Viscosity (ASTM D445)
cSt @ 40ºC 81
cSt @ 100ºC 13.4
Viscosity Index 167
Sulphated Ash, wt% (ASTM D874) 0.6
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC (ASTM D4683) 3.8
Pour Point, ºC (ASTM D97) -39
Flash Point, ºC (ASTM D92) 236
Density @15.6º C g/ml ASTM D4052) 0.85
At 100 deg C, the Mobil1 0W40 is actually thicker than the 5W40.
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/effects-of-shearing/
Originally Posted by bitog
The higher the spread between the bottom number and the top number the more VI improvers are relied on for maintaining the viscosity. Better to keep the numbers closer.
It wasn't until talking to my tuner (after going FI) I started looking into using a higher "cold" weight.
#43
Got it
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
I belive it applies to both dyno an synthetic although more apparent in dyno oil.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/effects-of-shearing/
I ran a full synthetic (GC 0W30) in my S2000 for years. Even when it became a dedicated track car. I eventually switched to the Mobil Delvac 1 0W40 (Esso XD Extra rebranded) for the added protection to handle the heat.
It wasn't until talking to my tuner (after going FI) I started looking into using a higher "cold" weight.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/effects-of-shearing/
I ran a full synthetic (GC 0W30) in my S2000 for years. Even when it became a dedicated track car. I eventually switched to the Mobil Delvac 1 0W40 (Esso XD Extra rebranded) for the added protection to handle the heat.
It wasn't until talking to my tuner (after going FI) I started looking into using a higher "cold" weight.
After the base oil has sheared or squeezed out, The last line of defense is an additive that puts down a barrier film. This additive usually has higher levels of strength against shearing so it helps keep the wear down. Alright, here’s the catch. In 96, the lubrication industry changed from the SH to SJ API rated oil by reducing the barrier lubricant additives to help preserve cat converters on cars. Why?, It appears that the manufactures / lubrication experts are concerned with contaminating the cat converters with the standard antiwear additives in the motor oils so they have reduced the levels of antiwear additives to preserve the cats. Hmmm, guess what, When they introduced the new SL GF-3 oils, They left it the same. Ok, not out of the woods yet… Now the new GF-4 oils are in the works in hopes to be introduced next year around April. Have a guess one of the things they are going to do?, YEP, reduce the current antiwear additives again.
... which is what I've been saying all along about the 5W40 Formula M and in particular about the ESP oils. Again, the anti-wear additives are higher in the Mobil1 0W40 than either one of the 5W40 formulations. Not as environment and emission friendly, but better protection for the motor.
Don't get me wrong - I am not preaching the gospel about Mobil1 0W40 or any Mobil1 oil for that matter. I also have a custom-built stroker engine in my 928, and I also use 15W50 in it instead of the factory recommended 5W30 (or for that matter 0W40). The only point I am trying to make is that both of the 5W40 oils and in particular the 229.51 ESP spec from MB are now "MB recommended" for emissions purposes, not because they are better for your engine.
P.S. The shear strength (HTHS) of all three Mobil1 oils discussed is the same at 3.8 mPas. Once the oil film shears, it's the anti-wear additives in the 0W40 that make it the best choice of the three.
Last edited by Diabolis; 03-05-2014 at 07:53 PM.
#45
MBWorld Fanatic!
Good to know. Yet another metric to consider when deciding on an oil.
Been searching for a few min now without much luck. Trying to find the Phosphorus/Zinc PPM levels and HTHS Viscosity for Mobil Delvac 1 0W-40.
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English-...-esp-0w40.aspx
Been searching for a few min now without much luck. Trying to find the Phosphorus/Zinc PPM levels and HTHS Viscosity for Mobil Delvac 1 0W-40.
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English-...-esp-0w40.aspx
#46
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
Been searching for a few min now without much luck. Trying to find the Phosphorus/Zinc PPM levels and HTHS Viscosity for Mobil Delvac 1 0W-40.
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English-...-esp-0w40.aspx
http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English-...-esp-0w40.aspx
Sorry - I don't have that information either. A partial list is at http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf but I don't see the Delvac among them. I can probably get the info though if you're interested.
Are you thinking of using Delvac in a diesel car or something heavier-duty?
#47
MBWorld Fanatic!
Sorry - I don't have that information either. A partial list is at http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/...duct_Guide.pdf but I don't see the Delvac among them. I can probably get the info though if you're interested.
Are you thinking of using Delvac in a diesel car or something heavier-duty?
Are you thinking of using Delvac in a diesel car or something heavier-duty?
If you have access to the info it would be interesting to see the data. It used to be Esso XD-3 Extra that was recently rebranded to the Mobil Delvac 1 a couple years back.
#48
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Received 794 Likes
on
545 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
All the different MB oil specs and how they compare to one another (shows actual permissible engine component wear, additives, etc.):
http://www.lubritecinc.com/PDF/MB_Sp...ils_2012.1.pdf
(copied form last post at an old thread at BITOG - http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...p/topics/31947)
http://www.lubritecinc.com/PDF/MB_Sp...ils_2012.1.pdf
(copied form last post at an old thread at BITOG - http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...p/topics/31947)
#49
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I know that on the SL55 there are 2 oil drain plugs "front and rear on the pan." On the C63 there is 1 oil drain plug on the pan and 1 plug on the oil cooler located in front of the passenger side wheel.
How many oil drain plugs are there on a 2009 SL63? I have located 1 main drain plug on the actual oil pan facing the driver's side and that's it. I took off the extra panel in front of the passenger side wheel that exposes the oil cooler with the fan attached to it but can't find anything that resembles a drain plug on the oil cooler.
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
How many oil drain plugs are there on a 2009 SL63? I have located 1 main drain plug on the actual oil pan facing the driver's side and that's it. I took off the extra panel in front of the passenger side wheel that exposes the oil cooler with the fan attached to it but can't find anything that resembles a drain plug on the oil cooler.
Any help would be greatly appreciated...
#50
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,512
Received 432 Likes
on
355 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
On the C63 the oil cooler drain plug is on the right side of the center cooler just before the line that leads to the auxiliary cooler in the wheel well. There are some rubber flaps that may conceal it a little bit so you have to look closely. Not sure if it is the same on your SL63 but worth a look.