NEW 2015 C63 SpyShots....in BLACK
Maybe, maybe not. On the standard W205 C-Class it will be located there. It could be non-functional and a remnant of using a standard W205 column.
The cloth inside the interior could be hiding a center console-mounted gear selector.
Guess we'll have to wait to be sure.
). That would be much better than a steering column-mounted shifter.
There is no way that is the correct ride height - that alone makes it hard to judge.
Those are not the wheels it will get and clearly that is not the fitment.
Ride height and fitment. It's called stance. Changing the stance changes the look. Dramatically.
You can not see the spoiler or the diffuser. They are there - that's all we know.
Look at the way the camo tape covers some of the taillight etc. Wouldn't it have been so much easier to not carry on past the edge go the trunk lid? Must be a reason for that - some styling cue we can't see.
So we see a basic shape of a car, with incorrect ride height, incorrect fitment and wheels, multiple features covered up, and not even all it's lights visible. For all we know it's Kate Freakin Upton in a burkka. There could be raw sex appeal under there and we don't see it because they do not want us to. They are hiding it, it's their job, and they are good at their job.
Having said all of that, I think tail end design is the weak link on many many cars including our own. I suppose it is the result of satisfying all the safety regs on the front end and what that leaves you to work with. "Wimpy ***" is more the norm than the exception I'm afraid.
Last edited by 604 C63; Apr 10, 2014 at 12:12 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
There is no way that is the correct ride height - that alone makes it hard to judge.
Those are the wheels it will get and clearly that is not the fitment.
Ride height and fitment. It's called stance. Changing the stance changes the look. Dramatically.
You can not see the spoiler or the diffuser. They are there - that's all we know.
Look at the way the camo tape covers some of the taillight etc. Wouldn't it have been so much easier to not carry on past the edge go the trunk lid? Must be a reason for that - some styling cue we can't see.
So we see a basic shape of a car, with incorrect ride height, incorrect fitment and wheels, multiple features covered up, and not even all it's lights visible. For all we know it's Kate Freakin Upton in a burkka. There could be raw sex appeal under there and we don't see it because they do not want us to. They are hiding it, it's their job, and they are good at their job.
Having said all of that, I think tail end design is the weak link on many many cars including our own. I suppose it is the result of satisfying all the safety regs on the front end and what that leaves you to work with. "Wimpy ***" is more the norm than the exception I'm afraid.
Well said.
A video of a new C Class diesel.
The C63 was very loud and very, very fast... Maybe it's because of the professional driver, but when we were looking, we all agreed they were going faster than that we were driving this day (that coming from my friends with a GT3 and a Ferrari)
I also noticed that the gearshifts were very agressive... Double-clutch?
A friend of me took some pictures, I'll post them if I get them...
The C63 was very loud and very, very fast... Maybe it's because of the professional driver, but when we were looking, we all agreed they were going faster than that we were driving this day (that coming from my friends with a GT3 and a Ferrari)
I also noticed that the gearshifts were very agressive... Double-clutch?
A friend of me took some pictures, I'll post them if I get them...











