avery.whss

then he got a lemon or high up in the mountians, theres a ton of other videos of guys hitting 250km in 20 or so seconds..no way does an extra 30km add 10 seconds...does it?

AMG893

19 Secs Approx

AMG893

Look, your right in the fact, we dont know where the vid are taken. I concede to that.

But all im saying is, i have yet to see a C63 lay down those times in stock form or with a Eurocharged Tune.
Hell, i have a C63 as everyone here does, and there is no way it would do those times (mine at least)

When you say "no way does 30km add 10 seconds", im not going to say it DOES, but the rate of speed drops alot the faster one goes. Its how they are geared.

Ingenieur

Stck takes 23 to 150 mph
25 -26 to 155 (250 kph)

You are trpping ***** if you think you can add 20 mph to 155 mph in 2 to 5 sec
Try 8 to 12

But even using yours
20 + 2 to 5 = 22 to 27
Way off less than 15
Stck car is 35+ sec range

AMG893

Sorry to spam this thread with all the video links, i just wanted to make it clear, there are other cars out there, much more performance orientated than ours, that cant pull these times (Bar the Alpha E63!!!!!)

Granted, we dont know where the vids were taken, but c'mon.......

Ingenieur

A porsche turbo s takes 7 sec to go from 135 to 160
It does 0-100 in 7 sec


You think a tuned c63 will go 150 to 175 faster?

avery.whss

0-100mph in 7 seconds? isn't that kinda slow?

AMG893

0-100kph in 7 seconds........

avery.whss

yeah thats kinda slow isn't it? c63s do 0-60mph stock in what 4.5? thats close to 100kph

Ingenieur

It's actually 6.7
No not slow
Our cars take close to 10

It takes 16 to 150
Ours take 23

Slow compared to your 0-175 mph in < 15 sec car I suppose lol

CarHopper

That would be a 10 second car if not 9. 0-100 in 7 seconds is pretty fast.

Ingenieur

0-100 MPH in less than 7 sec
0-60 is like 3 sec
2.84 to be exact
But let's talk order of magnitude not split hairs

avery.whss

Wait what? Lol?? Kph is the same as KM right? (never know with the americans) 10 seconds for a c63 to hit 0-100km? you guys HAVE to be trolling now...no c63 on the planet takes 10 seconds to go from 0-100km thats slower then a V6 mustang

Ingenieur

10.9 at 128 mph
Road & track vol 63 no 3
Veyron/gtr/911 tt s comparison

Ingenieur

In your post you actually wrote '0-100 mph'
So wtf are you talking about lol

Ingenieur

Mph

My response said ours was 10 sec
So you knew the units were mph

But not 0-175 MPH in < 15 sec lol

avery.whss

ohhh **** my bad i meant kph lol my mistake

avery.whss

yeah i see your reply now..makes more sense, when that AMG guy wrote kph i was kinda confused lol

Ingenieur

Apparently it does
Closer to 12 sec

Ingenieur

Porsche tt s
0-100 mph 7 sec
135-160 mph 7 sec
Delta 100 mph takes 7 sec or 14 mph per sec
Delta 25 mph takes 7 sec or 3.5 mph per sec

Do you really think accel is linear across the entire speed range?
Really?
This is above your pay grade
I'm out
Lol

avery.whss

Pretty sure my pay grade is higher then most members on this forum besides jcart...lol..pay grade has nothing to do with knowledge on information...i've met broke people who make some rich people look stupid, not everyone is knowledgeable in all areas, you'd blow me away with cars and engineering...the same way you'd have no idea what to do in the IT world

Ingenieur

A car requires a force to accel as in f = ma
This force is engine torque x gearing or torque multiplication
As you go faster the gearing or torque multiplication gets smaller
In turn so does the force
So you accelerate slower as gearing is higher ( lower numerically)

avery.whss

makes sense, does drag or anything make it slower the faster it goes or does it cut through the air better the faster it goes? i've driven some cars that feel like a tank after 100km but some cars just effortlessly glide after that so i'm guessing it all depends on how the car is setup/designed

Ingenieur

We 've been down this road
You don't make 100,000 usd per month lol
I can say with 100% certainty I know much more about IT than you do engineering

I was programming with FORTRAN on paper tape 40 years ago
In jr HS

We are discussing HS level physics not quantum mechanics lol

avery.whss