C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Weistec Stage III SC. Stock Engine Internals goes 10.22.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-29-2015, 05:05 PM
  #26  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Kriston
Congratulations! your car is silly fast The Aussies sure know how to do it right
There is a small group out here that keep pushing each other to go faster, so expect some even better times to come out of here in the future.

Originally Posted by blackbenzz
Wow that's awesome! Congrats on the killer runs! Get that 60 down for even better times! Looking forward to your future results
Thanks mate. I agree. a 1.6 60ft is pretty crappy. I was cutting high 1.5 60fts with the Stage 2. Need to look into some different wheels and/or tyres.

Originally Posted by Merc63
Is this a stock Weistec tune? Seems like your putting down more power then most?
This is a Weistec tune, but Allen @ International Autohaus who built it, spent quite a bit of time on the dyno, and with the help of Weistec they got the tune to where they want it.
Old 10-29-2015, 05:39 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Asher4799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 337
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
2009 C63/ 2015 C63 507 coupe
Congratulations!!! That's moving!!!
Old 10-29-2015, 05:54 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
What was done to the tune to pump it up more?
Old 10-29-2015, 10:02 PM
  #29  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
What was done to the tune to pump it up more?
It is not pumped up, it is just perfected. Rather than using a base tune, Allen spent time of the dyno getting all the variables right.

I think the headers also made a big difference. I was running a full iPE system and changed the headers to a set of his custom built headers. The iPE was restrictive and this showed with a significant wheel hp gain with the same setup but different headers.
Old 10-29-2015, 11:23 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
are you running the stock resonator back?

What size collector and primaries?
Old 10-30-2015, 12:17 AM
  #31  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
are you running the stock resonator back?

What size collector and primaries?
Running the iPE system after these headers.

2in primaries. Not sure about collector size.

Here is a pic of them.


Old 10-30-2015, 12:39 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mr747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,398
Received 370 Likes on 212 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by charliekay
Running the iPE system after these headers.

2in primaries. Not sure about collector size.

Here is a pic of them.


Merc63 there MBH headers modified to fit on RHD cars
Old 10-30-2015, 12:49 AM
  #33  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by mr747
Merc63 there MBH headers modified to fit on RHD cars
Correct. Started as MBH headers, but it wasn't just modify to fit a RHD car, there was alot of back and forth to make the best flow and power.
Old 10-30-2015, 01:23 AM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Wonder what your running for timing. You're making more power than most stage 3 cars. Dunno if it's the headers.
Old 10-30-2015, 01:39 AM
  #35  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
Wonder what your running for timing. You're making more power than most stage 3 cars. Dunno if it's the headers.
I couldn't tell you what I am running for timing.

It might be the headers, it might be the V2 of the tranny, it might be a well prepped track on a perfect night for racing, but the car is the same Stage 3 kit, belt and 67mm pulley that everyone else has. Only thing different is the the tune and headers.

If you look at the time slips the 3 runs were all done in 20 minutes (6.51pm, 7.02pm, 7.13pm). The car didn't have time to cool and still ran consistently.
Old 10-30-2015, 08:59 AM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,053
Received 2,827 Likes on 1,670 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
It's a little easier for me to visualize on a spreadsheet. Comparing your three best times on the board - Merc63, Mr747, and charliekay - you can see the differences immediately.

Weistec Stage III SC. Stock Engine Internals goes 10.22.-fastest-20sc_1.jpg

Whatever you're doing charlie, it's working man. Your car seems to just make a lot more power at a given SC stage, evidenced by how fast you were running at Stage 2.
Old 10-30-2015, 11:18 AM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
My runs were done at about 2500-3000 dA range, far from sea level. But your making another 100hp than I am, so it's not the tranny or the prep. The car is running strong. I suspect they are running more timing in the tune perhaps. Lots of guys are running the mbh headers and aren't putting down that much power. That mph is huge.
Old 10-30-2015, 11:28 AM
  #38  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by charliekay
If you look at the time slips the 3 runs were all done in 20 minutes (6.51pm, 7.02pm, 7.13pm). The car didn't have time to cool and still ran consistently.
Impressive!
Old 10-30-2015, 12:53 PM
  #39  
Member
 
computertom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 225
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
2017 911, 2012 C63
I'm just amazed that this is stock pistons and rods (non-forged). Has the engine ever been apart?

-Tom
Old 10-30-2015, 07:29 PM
  #40  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Weistec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 585
Received 29 Likes on 10 Posts
Weistec
Originally Posted by Merc63
My runs were done at about 2500-3000 dA range, far from sea level. But your making another 100hp than I am, so it's not the tranny or the prep. The car is running strong. I suspect they are running more timing in the tune perhaps. Lots of guys are running the mbh headers and aren't putting down that much power. That mph is huge.
The tune is our out of the box Stage 3 tune. The issue was the long tube headers, and partly the intake system on the car. This car actually dyno'd low on the dyno International Autohaus was using.

Our latest transmission upgrades do help getting the car down the track much faster. Hope this helps guys.

Weistec Engineering
Old 10-30-2015, 07:46 PM
  #41  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Merc63
My runs were done at about 2500-3000 dA range, far from sea level. But your making another 100hp than I am, so it's not the tranny or the prep. The car is running strong. I suspect they are running more timing in the tune perhaps. Lots of guys are running the mbh headers and aren't putting down that much power. That mph is huge.
The times might have something to do with DA. We had a Stage 2 CLK63BS run a high 10.4 out here a few weeks ago, my best with Stage 2 was a 10.57, and even mr747 ran 10.56 with his Stage 2 and that was a different track.

It is not just my car, Weistec is getting faster.

Originally Posted by Weistec
The tune is our out of the box Stage 3 tune. The issue was the long tube headers, and partly the intake system on the car. This car actually dyno'd low on the dyno International Autohaus was using.

Our latest transmission upgrades do help getting the car down the track much faster. Hope this helps guys.

Weistec Engineering
Thanks Weistec. I know these was a problem with the headers, and when we changed the headers over we saw an immediate increase in power.

Thanks for your help with the car, looking forward to going faster.
Old 10-30-2015, 08:09 PM
  #42  
Junior Member
 
65fastback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
amg c63
in drag racing...MPH / trap speed is a direct indication of how much power you are making. 137 is awesome.

How much does this car weigh with driver?
Old 10-30-2015, 08:31 PM
  #43  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
Well I am excited to get the V2 tranny if it helps out, too bad I sold my drag tires
Old 10-30-2015, 08:59 PM
  #44  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
layzie12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,274
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
2008 Mercedes Benz E63
Jerry from Eurocharged told me in an E mail that MBH headers make less power then the design used by ARH. If this is true or not I do not know. I do know that my car seems to be down on power compared to your average 63. It seems quite a few 63 people run MBH's tri-y set up and make power with the e.t. and mph to back it up. You car is hauling absolute *** though. Good job!
Old 10-30-2015, 10:22 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,053
Received 2,827 Likes on 1,670 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
That's the first time I've heard that one. I thought it was pretty accepted that the MBH setup makes the most power out of what's available off-the-shelf.
Old 10-30-2015, 11:31 PM
  #46  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
charliekay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 700
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by 65fastback
in drag racing...MPH / trap speed is a direct indication of how much power you are making. 137 is awesome.

How much does this car weigh with driver?
The car did go 139mph in a 10.26 run. Car is full weight so probably 1800kg+ with driver.

Originally Posted by Merc63
Well I am excited to get the V2 tranny if it helps out, too bad I sold my drag tires
What drag tyres did you have? I am looking at options. Not many unfortunately. Not sure how good the V1 tranny was but the V2 is amazing. Unbelievable.

Originally Posted by layzie12g
Jerry from Eurocharged told me in an E mail that MBH headers make less power then the design used by ARH. If this is true or not I do not know. I do know that my car seems to be down on power compared to your average 63. It seems quite a few 63 people run MBH's tri-y set up and make power with the e.t. and mph to back it up. You car is hauling absolute *** though. Good job!
Lol. A few people Say that the tri-y setup is outdated and don't make max. power. I can tell you that the tri-y setup has had significant gains over my iPE setup. I couldn't care less for dyno numbers. ET and MPH says it all. For example, the dyno we used had its software updated, we lost power just from a software update, and it wasn't a small loss.

Originally Posted by BLKROKT
That's the first time I've heard that one. I thought it was pretty accepted that the MBH setup makes the most power out of what's available off-the-shelf.
I was sceptical about the difference the headers would make, but i trust my guy and he was adamant the existing headers were holding back power. I decided to try it, and how right he was.
Old 10-31-2015, 11:39 AM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
layzie12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,274
Received 38 Likes on 33 Posts
2008 Mercedes Benz E63
There are a few threads from Mike at MBH where he goes really in depth as to why they went with the Tri Y design and the experience they have making headers. That was the reason I went with them, but my car had power issues so I wanted Jerry to look at the tune. He responded with an e mail stating that cars with MBH long tubes make less power, and left it at that. I was a little surprised to hear it, but it seems to not be exactly true from the research I have done.
Old 10-31-2015, 01:16 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
roadtalontsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,122
Received 298 Likes on 191 Posts
10 C six trizzle
well the mbh headers were also probably designed with the thoughts of an N/A motor. At the time they were produced i dont think any blower cars were out there yet. The scavenging affects of a properly designed header for an N/A car arent going to have any benefits to a blown car, Im assuming this probably becomes a restriction eventually since the air flow volume changes so drastically with the blower setup.
Old 10-31-2015, 02:14 PM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Merc63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,562
Received 42 Likes on 36 Posts
C63 AMG
You can easily go to burns stainless and input all the engine data to see what headers are needed.
Old 10-31-2015, 05:18 PM
  #50  
Member
 
marioflex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 194
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
c63 AMG
I'm not Shure but if PP Performance car, mr747, CharlieKay and myself as many other Weistec cars are using MBH tri Y headers and are running fast I think something has to be right with this headers.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Weistec Stage III SC. Stock Engine Internals goes 10.22.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.