C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help! Time for new tires... Calling all wheel/tire experts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-27-2017, 01:53 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,508
Received 432 Likes on 355 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
Originally Posted by brian63
Right now, I bought new wheels front 19x9 and 19x10 rear and I'm lowered with HnR coilovers. Am I able to use front 245/35/19 and rear 265/30/19? or should I use rear 275/30/19? Will I rub on the rear?

What offsets are the wheels? 245/35/19 front and up to 275/30/19 are possible depending on offsets.
Old 04-29-2017, 11:20 PM
  #27  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
zcct04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston - Clear Lake
Posts: 1,307
Received 80 Likes on 66 Posts
C63 coupe, Z3M Roadster garage queen
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
Out of your options, I'd just repurchase the MPSS. TR has them on sale and in stock, snap em up!
Tire Rack lists 2 options for 245/40ZR18 fronts. One is priced at $181.77 and the other is at $201.55. The second tire is described as MO Mercedes. Ratings all appear the same. Any clues about what's different, any insights about whether it's worth paying the extra $20/tire?

Standard: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...SSXL&tab=Sizes

MO Mercedes: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...XLV2&tab=Sizes
Old 04-30-2017, 05:48 AM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,053
Received 2,827 Likes on 1,670 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Originally Posted by zcct04
Tire Rack lists 2 options for 245/40ZR18 fronts. One is priced at $181.77 and the other is at $201.55. The second tire is described as MO Mercedes. Ratings all appear the same. Any clues about what's different, any insights about whether it's worth paying the extra $20/tire?

Standard: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...SSXL&tab=Sizes

MO Mercedes: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...XLV2&tab=Sizes

Good question, I just asked the same thing fairly recently.

MO is for 2 things. The first is to show that these are the OE tire choice for the car, and that the tire is weight-rated and tuned specifically for the Mercedes that they came on (for instance the BS came in funky sizes and weight ratings that are impossible to match with anything outside of a MO tire). Both of these tires are 97Y, so there's something else going on. MO also stands for Mercedes quasi run-flat capabilities. It seems to be somewhere between a regular tire and a true run-flat in its abilities here, as they do not meet the true run-flat standard for distance etc. So from a practical perspective, I'd expect the MO tires to have a stiffer sidewall than a non-MO with all other things being equal.

More info here:
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiret...jsp?techid=234
http://www.rtecshop.com/shop/wheel-a...ted-tyres.html

Last edited by BLKROKT; 04-30-2017 at 05:57 AM.
Old 04-30-2017, 09:26 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,236
Received 1,587 Likes on 935 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by zcct04
Tire Rack lists 2 options for 245/40ZR18 fronts. One is priced at $181.77 and the other is at $201.55. The second tire is described as MO Mercedes. Ratings all appear the same. Any clues about what's different, any insights about whether it's worth paying the extra $20/tire?

Standard: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...SSXL&tab=Sizes

MO Mercedes: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...XLV2&tab=Sizes
Tread width is wider on the non MO version (9" vs 8.6"). Since the section width is the same that suggests it may have a rounder shoulder for the Mercedes (MO) designed version.

Other than that, who knows. I don't think the design differences are ever made public knowledge. Even if both tires say they're a 97Y load rating, the MO version could actually be higher.
Old 04-30-2017, 10:07 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,053
Received 2,827 Likes on 1,670 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Originally Posted by Jasonoff
Tread width is wider on the non MO version (9" vs 8.6"). Since the section width is the same that suggests it may have a rounder shoulder for the Mercedes (MO) designed version.

Other than that, who knows. I don't think the design differences are ever made public knowledge. Even if both tires say they're a 97Y load rating, the MO version could actually be higher.
No, actually it definitely is public knowledge. The differences are known - fit, run-flat, weight rating, etc. See the links above.

The rounder shoulder is so that they fit on Mercedes specifically - the second link explains explicitly how the tires are "tuned" to fit the Mercedes fenders etc.

The MO prefix refers to a special type of approved tyre which is now supplied on most current Mercedes-Benz models. Mercedes-Benz recommend in instances where tyres with MO designation are fitted as original equipment that these tyres provide the optimum performance properties. Furthermore, for some tyre sizes e.g. 205/45ZR17 MO, the tyre dimensions have been designed to fit the available space in the wheel arch. This means that MO tyres may turn out to be narrower than tyres of the same indicated size without MO designation.
Old 04-30-2017, 10:58 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,236
Received 1,587 Likes on 935 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by BLKROKT
No, actually it definitely is public knowledge. The differences are known - fit, run-flat, weight rating, etc. See the links above.

The rounder shoulder is so that they fit on Mercedes specifically - the second link explains explicitly how the tires are "tuned" to fit the Mercedes fenders etc.
It's public knowledge if either manufacture makes the technical white paper available to the public. I haven't seen that done before, but, if you have, feel free to post the info from either Mercedes or Michelin.

Third party links, like what you provided are generally just speculation. Either by observation or possibly reverse engineering. Although potentially very accurate, it doesn't mean the technical details were made public knowledge.

Case in point, who TF is RTech Shop? That blurb could have been written by some co-op student.
Old 04-30-2017, 11:18 AM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
BLKROKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,053
Received 2,827 Likes on 1,670 Posts
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
Fair enough. But do any manufacturers make technical whitepapers available on their proprietary and confidential tire technology and manufacturing methods? It's in their competitive best interests to not release much. So all we are left with is observation and reverse engineering in the end, no?

I think the Tire Rack link above is probably as accurate as it gets, as the manufacturers (both tire and car) probably give them as much information as anyone on how to differentiate one tire from another. That's outside of the racing tires which I assume are analyzed in extreme detail by racing teams and car manufacturers with the budgets to do so - although it's a question of how much of that is publically available.

This link is actually from MB, so might be a more reliable source but doesn't say much as you would expect. https://www.mbusa.com/mercedes/servi..._parts_article

And while this isn't exactly an "official" source, it's probably closer to what you're looking for. https://www.mbwholesaleparts.com/serviceItemTires.aspx

Last edited by BLKROKT; 04-30-2017 at 11:22 AM.
Old 04-30-2017, 11:54 AM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Jasonoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 5,236
Received 1,587 Likes on 935 Posts
2010 C63 AMG
Nope they don't which solidifies my comment. We, as the consumer have no idea what they changed other than what's physically obvious.

Yeah, that last link even suggests there could potentially be compound alterations. Maybe they use sriracha sauce as a mold release agent.
Old 04-07-2022, 04:40 PM
  #34  
Member
 
Erik Apple's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 129
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
2018 C63
Is 97Y an acceptable load rating for a C63 sedan?
Old 04-09-2022, 11:08 PM
  #35  
Member
 
todthedod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 102
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
'12 C63 P31 coupe
Originally Posted by itzjonjon69
Oh that's not bad, I was thinking more along the lines of only 4-5k miles. When I bought the wheels they came with the tires. Fronts were brand new and rears had about 50-60% tread life
You'll be lucky to get 5k miles on those suckers but it sure will be a fun 5k miles.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Help! Time for new tires... Calling all wheel/tire experts



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 PM.